Ranking ecological contingencies from high-order factorial data demonstrate tidy control of biodiversity from facilitation cascades in estuaries on the South Island of New Zealand

IF 5.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Ecography Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1111/ecog.07488
Ken Joseph E. Clemente, Mads S. Thomsen
{"title":"Ranking ecological contingencies from high-order factorial data demonstrate tidy control of biodiversity from facilitation cascades in estuaries on the South Island of New Zealand","authors":"Ken Joseph E. Clemente, Mads S. Thomsen","doi":"10.1111/ecog.07488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Community ecology has been described as a ‘mess' because ecological processes vary in space, time, and across species traits, resulting in myriads of ecological contingencies and low scientific predictability. Here, we aimed to identify and rank ecological contingencies and improve predictability using fully crossed high-order factorial mensurative and manipulative experiments across axes of spatiotemporal variability that may influence the strength of facilitation cascades on the South Island of New Zealand. Facilitation cascades, arising from chains of positive interactions, are prevalent in intertidal sedimentary estuaries, where biogenic habitat-formers, such as bivalves and attached seaweed, provide hard substrates, food, hiding places, and reduce environmental stress for small animals. Specifically, we measured facilitation of &gt; 65 000 small mobile invertebrates across eight archetypical contingencies, i.e. within and between seasons, latitudes, sites with different distances to the open ocean, vertical intertidal elevations, wider habitat matrix (bare sediment vs seagrass beds), and between small-scale habitat-forming species (the endemic cockle <i>Austrovenus</i> and attached cosmopolitan seaweeds, <i>Ulva</i> and <i>Gracilaria</i> spp.) and their sizes. Overall, our multifactorial tests revealed that most higher-order interactions (three-way or more) were not important ecologically and that many important lower-order interactions (two-way) were ‘simple', demonstrating that facilitation can increase when and where the baseline biodiversity is higher. Furthermore, most of the main test factors were significant and ecologically important, suggesting that facilitation of animals, generally and across other factors, was strongest on large and morphologically complex seaweeds, at near-ocean sites and deeper intertidal elevations, and in warmer summer months. Our case study highlights a relatively tidy – not messy – control of biodiversity of intertidal epifauna, and that high-order factorial sampling can help unravel and rank co-occurring spatiotemporal drivers to better understand ecological contingencies. Finally, our results may also inform management of habitat-forming species to preserve estuarine biodiversity and maintain their secondary production.","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.07488","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Community ecology has been described as a ‘mess' because ecological processes vary in space, time, and across species traits, resulting in myriads of ecological contingencies and low scientific predictability. Here, we aimed to identify and rank ecological contingencies and improve predictability using fully crossed high-order factorial mensurative and manipulative experiments across axes of spatiotemporal variability that may influence the strength of facilitation cascades on the South Island of New Zealand. Facilitation cascades, arising from chains of positive interactions, are prevalent in intertidal sedimentary estuaries, where biogenic habitat-formers, such as bivalves and attached seaweed, provide hard substrates, food, hiding places, and reduce environmental stress for small animals. Specifically, we measured facilitation of > 65 000 small mobile invertebrates across eight archetypical contingencies, i.e. within and between seasons, latitudes, sites with different distances to the open ocean, vertical intertidal elevations, wider habitat matrix (bare sediment vs seagrass beds), and between small-scale habitat-forming species (the endemic cockle Austrovenus and attached cosmopolitan seaweeds, Ulva and Gracilaria spp.) and their sizes. Overall, our multifactorial tests revealed that most higher-order interactions (three-way or more) were not important ecologically and that many important lower-order interactions (two-way) were ‘simple', demonstrating that facilitation can increase when and where the baseline biodiversity is higher. Furthermore, most of the main test factors were significant and ecologically important, suggesting that facilitation of animals, generally and across other factors, was strongest on large and morphologically complex seaweeds, at near-ocean sites and deeper intertidal elevations, and in warmer summer months. Our case study highlights a relatively tidy – not messy – control of biodiversity of intertidal epifauna, and that high-order factorial sampling can help unravel and rank co-occurring spatiotemporal drivers to better understand ecological contingencies. Finally, our results may also inform management of habitat-forming species to preserve estuarine biodiversity and maintain their secondary production.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecography
Ecography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
122
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem. Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography. Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.
期刊最新文献
Ranking ecological contingencies from high-order factorial data demonstrate tidy control of biodiversity from facilitation cascades in estuaries on the South Island of New Zealand Richness patterns in vertebrates are robust to the Linnean and Wallacean shortfalls Regional databases demonstrate macroecological patterns less clearly than systematically collected field data Genetic structure and diversity of the declining orchid Gymnadenia conopsea in Scandinavia: implications for conservation and management Parsimonious machine learning for the global mapping of aboveground biomass potential
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1