A study of differences in absorbed dose estimates by images used in dosimetry of Lu-177-DOTATATE therapy.

IF 1.5 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiological Physics and Technology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1007/s12194-025-00898-y
Yui Masaki, Yasuo Yamashita, Takuro Isoda, Toyoyuki Kato, Shingo Baba
{"title":"A study of differences in absorbed dose estimates by images used in dosimetry of Lu-177-DOTATATE therapy.","authors":"Yui Masaki, Yasuo Yamashita, Takuro Isoda, Toyoyuki Kato, Shingo Baba","doi":"10.1007/s12194-025-00898-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Lu-177-labeled peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, dosimetry has recently gained importance for assessing side effects and treatment responses. However, no standard method has been established yet. In this retrospective study, we compared the kidney-absorbed doses of 24 treatments with Lu-177-DOTATATE using three methods: a planar method using only planar images, a hybrid method using planar and SPECT/CT images, and a SPECT/CT method using only SPECT/CT images. In the Planar method, the ROI was defined from 2D whole-body planar images and calculated using the MIRD method. In the Hybrid method, the VOI was defined from CT images and the VOIs were placed in the 2D planar image as ROIs, which were calculated using the MIRD method. For the SPECT/CT method, the VOI was defined from CT images and the mean absorbed dose was estimated on a voxel basis. The absorbed dose estimated with the Planar method (15.2 ± 5.81 Gy) was significantly higher than the estimates with the other two methods (Hybrid: 2.93 ± 1.33 Gy, SPECT/CT: 3.81 ± 0.93 Gy) (p < 0.05). The Hybrid and SPECT/CT methods exhibited the strongest correlation. The Planar method demonstrated the highest variability in estimated values. The use of 2D planar images alone tended to overestimate the absorbed dose compared to the other methods, depending on the definition of the ROIs and the characteristics of the analysis software. This suggests that a combined approach using SPECT/CT and planar images is preferable for dosimetry.</p>","PeriodicalId":46252,"journal":{"name":"Radiological Physics and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"477-483"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiological Physics and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-025-00898-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Lu-177-labeled peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, dosimetry has recently gained importance for assessing side effects and treatment responses. However, no standard method has been established yet. In this retrospective study, we compared the kidney-absorbed doses of 24 treatments with Lu-177-DOTATATE using three methods: a planar method using only planar images, a hybrid method using planar and SPECT/CT images, and a SPECT/CT method using only SPECT/CT images. In the Planar method, the ROI was defined from 2D whole-body planar images and calculated using the MIRD method. In the Hybrid method, the VOI was defined from CT images and the VOIs were placed in the 2D planar image as ROIs, which were calculated using the MIRD method. For the SPECT/CT method, the VOI was defined from CT images and the mean absorbed dose was estimated on a voxel basis. The absorbed dose estimated with the Planar method (15.2 ± 5.81 Gy) was significantly higher than the estimates with the other two methods (Hybrid: 2.93 ± 1.33 Gy, SPECT/CT: 3.81 ± 0.93 Gy) (p < 0.05). The Hybrid and SPECT/CT methods exhibited the strongest correlation. The Planar method demonstrated the highest variability in estimated values. The use of 2D planar images alone tended to overestimate the absorbed dose compared to the other methods, depending on the definition of the ROIs and the characteristics of the analysis software. This suggests that a combined approach using SPECT/CT and planar images is preferable for dosimetry.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
lu177 - dotatate治疗剂量学中使用的图像吸收剂量估计差异的研究。
在lu -177标记的肽受体放射性核素治疗中,剂量法最近在评估副作用和治疗反应方面变得重要。然而,目前还没有建立标准的方法。在这项回顾性研究中,我们使用三种方法比较了24种治疗方法与Lu-177-DOTATATE的肾吸收剂量:一种仅使用平面图像的平面方法,一种使用平面和SPECT/CT图像的混合方法,以及一种仅使用SPECT/CT图像的SPECT/CT方法。在Planar方法中,从二维全身平面图像中定义ROI,并使用MIRD方法计算ROI。在Hybrid方法中,从CT图像中定义VOI,并将VOI作为roi放置在二维平面图像中,使用MIRD方法计算roi。对于SPECT/CT方法,从CT图像中定义VOI,并以体素为基础估计平均吸收剂量。Planar法估计的吸收剂量(15.2±5.81 Gy)显著高于其他两种方法(Hybrid法:2.93±1.33 Gy, SPECT/CT法:3.81±0.93 Gy) (p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiological Physics and Technology
Radiological Physics and Technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal Radiological Physics and Technology is to provide a forum for sharing new knowledge related to research and development in radiological science and technology, including medical physics and radiological technology in diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiation therapy among many other radiological disciplines, as well as to contribute to progress and improvement in medical practice and patient health care.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing proton therapy for superficial lesions using patient-specific bolus and multi-leaf collimator. James Chadwick (1891-1974): from the neutron discovery to neutron beams for medicine. Understanding nonlinearity in weighted least-squares image reconstruction for nuclear medicine. Selection of Radiological Physics and Technology Awards 2025. Fast and accurate iterative reconstruction using a volume integral model with look-up tables for pinhole SPECT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1