What and how: doing good research with young people, digital intimacies, and relationships and sex education.

IF 1.4 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Sex Education-Sexuality Society and Learning Pub Date : 2020-03-17 DOI:10.1080/14681811.2020.1732337
Rachel H Scott, Clarissa Smith, Eleanor Formby, Alison Hadley, Lisa Hallgarten, Alice Hoyle, Cicely Marston, Alan McKee, Dimitrios Tourountsis
{"title":"What and how: doing good research with young people, digital intimacies, and relationships and sex education.","authors":"Rachel H Scott,&nbsp;Clarissa Smith,&nbsp;Eleanor Formby,&nbsp;Alison Hadley,&nbsp;Lisa Hallgarten,&nbsp;Alice Hoyle,&nbsp;Cicely Marston,&nbsp;Alan McKee,&nbsp;Dimitrios Tourountsis","doi":"10.1080/14681811.2020.1732337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As part of a project funded by the Wellcome Trust, we held a one-day symposium, bringing together researchers, practitioners, and policymakers, to discuss priorities for research on relationships and sex education (RSE) in a world where young people increasingly live, experience, and augment their relationships (whether sexual or not) within digital spaces. The introduction of statutory RSE in schools in England highlights the need to focus on improving understandings of young people and digital intimacies for its own sake, and to inform the development of learning resources. We call for more research that puts young people at its centre; foregrounds inclusivity; and allows a nuanced discussion of pleasures, harms, risks, and rewards, which can be used by those working with young people and those developing policy. Generating such research is likely to be facilitated by participation, collaboration, and communication with beneficiaries, between disciplines and across sectors. Taking such an approach, academic researchers, practitioners, and policymakers agree that we need a better understanding of RSE's place in lifelong learning, which seeks to understand the needs of particular groups, is concerned with non-sexual relationships, and does not see digital intimacies as disconnected from offline everyday 'reality'.</p>","PeriodicalId":47510,"journal":{"name":"Sex Education-Sexuality Society and Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14681811.2020.1732337","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sex Education-Sexuality Society and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2020.1732337","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

As part of a project funded by the Wellcome Trust, we held a one-day symposium, bringing together researchers, practitioners, and policymakers, to discuss priorities for research on relationships and sex education (RSE) in a world where young people increasingly live, experience, and augment their relationships (whether sexual or not) within digital spaces. The introduction of statutory RSE in schools in England highlights the need to focus on improving understandings of young people and digital intimacies for its own sake, and to inform the development of learning resources. We call for more research that puts young people at its centre; foregrounds inclusivity; and allows a nuanced discussion of pleasures, harms, risks, and rewards, which can be used by those working with young people and those developing policy. Generating such research is likely to be facilitated by participation, collaboration, and communication with beneficiaries, between disciplines and across sectors. Taking such an approach, academic researchers, practitioners, and policymakers agree that we need a better understanding of RSE's place in lifelong learning, which seeks to understand the needs of particular groups, is concerned with non-sexual relationships, and does not see digital intimacies as disconnected from offline everyday 'reality'.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
做什么和怎么做:对年轻人进行良好的研究,数字亲密关系,关系和性教育。
作为一个由威康信托基金资助的项目的一部分,我们举办了一个为期一天的研讨会,汇集了研究人员、从业者和政策制定者,讨论在一个年轻人越来越多地在数字空间中生活、体验和扩大他们的关系(无论是性关系还是非性关系)的世界里,关系和性教育(RSE)研究的优先事项。英国学校引入法定RSE,凸显了为了自身的利益,需要专注于提高对年轻人和数字亲密关系的理解,并为学习资源的开发提供信息。我们呼吁进行更多以年轻人为中心的研究;前景包容性;它允许对快乐、伤害、风险和回报进行细致入微的讨论,这可以被那些与年轻人一起工作的人和那些制定政策的人使用。学科之间和跨部门之间的参与、合作和与受益者的交流很可能促进这类研究的产生。采用这种方法,学术研究人员、从业者和政策制定者一致认为,我们需要更好地理解RSE在终身学习中的地位,它旨在了解特定群体的需求,关注非性关系,并且不认为数字亲密关系与线下日常“现实”脱节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
10.50%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Staff perceptions of support for early menarche in Australian primary schools: a qualitative study Threats to accessing information about sexuality: examining the most frequently challenged books in the USA from 2011-2021 Shattering the silence: exploring the role of Chinese online sexual health influencers in promoting sex education Live-streaming comprehensive sexuality education in Western China: an analysis of the views of implementers and junior secondary students School health teachers’ gender-sensitive sexual health education experiences in South Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1