In vitro Candida albicans biofilm formation on different titanium surface topographies.

Mathieu Mouhat, Robert Moorehead, Craig Murdoch
{"title":"<i>In vitro Candida albicans</i> biofilm formation on different titanium surface topographies.","authors":"Mathieu Mouhat,&nbsp;Robert Moorehead,&nbsp;Craig Murdoch","doi":"10.1080/26415275.2020.1829489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate if differences in titanium implant surface topography influence <i>Candida albicans</i> biofilm formation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Titanium discs were prepared and characterized using a profilometer: Group A (<i>R</i> <sub>a</sub> 0.15 µm, smooth), Group B (<i>R</i> <sub>a</sub> 0.64 µm, minimally rough) and Group C (<i>R</i> <sub>a</sub> 1.3 µm, moderately rough). Contact angle and surface free energy (SFE) were determined for each group. Non-preconditioned titanium discs were incubated with <i>C. albicans</i> for 24 h. In additional experiments, the titanium discs were initially coated with human saliva, bovine serum albumin or phosphate-buffered saline for 2 h before incubation with <i>C. albicans</i> for 24 h. The amount of fungal biofilm formation was quantified using a colorimetric assay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><i>C. albicans</i> biofilm formation was significantly lower (<i>p</i> < 0.05) on the minimally rough titanium surface compared to smooth and moderately rough surfaces. The titanium surface displaying the lowest SFE (Group B) was associated with significantly lower (<i>p</i> < 0.05) <i>C. albicans</i> biofilm formation than the other two groups. Salivary coating resulted in greater adherence of <i>C. albicans</i> with increased surface roughness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The minimally rough titanium discs displayed lowest SFE compared to smooth and moderately rough surfaces and showed the least <i>C. albicans</i> biofilm formation. This study demonstrated that <i>C. albicans</i> biofilm formation increased in a SFE-dependent manner. These findings suggest that SFE might be a more explanatory factor for <i>C. albicans</i> biofilm formation on titanium surfaces than roughness. The presence of a pellicle coating may negate the impact of SFE on <i>C. albicans</i> biofilm formation on titanium surfaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":72378,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/26415275.2020.1829489","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2020.1829489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate if differences in titanium implant surface topography influence Candida albicans biofilm formation.

Materials and methods: Titanium discs were prepared and characterized using a profilometer: Group A (R a 0.15 µm, smooth), Group B (R a 0.64 µm, minimally rough) and Group C (R a 1.3 µm, moderately rough). Contact angle and surface free energy (SFE) were determined for each group. Non-preconditioned titanium discs were incubated with C. albicans for 24 h. In additional experiments, the titanium discs were initially coated with human saliva, bovine serum albumin or phosphate-buffered saline for 2 h before incubation with C. albicans for 24 h. The amount of fungal biofilm formation was quantified using a colorimetric assay.

Results: C. albicans biofilm formation was significantly lower (p < 0.05) on the minimally rough titanium surface compared to smooth and moderately rough surfaces. The titanium surface displaying the lowest SFE (Group B) was associated with significantly lower (p < 0.05) C. albicans biofilm formation than the other two groups. Salivary coating resulted in greater adherence of C. albicans with increased surface roughness.

Conclusions: The minimally rough titanium discs displayed lowest SFE compared to smooth and moderately rough surfaces and showed the least C. albicans biofilm formation. This study demonstrated that C. albicans biofilm formation increased in a SFE-dependent manner. These findings suggest that SFE might be a more explanatory factor for C. albicans biofilm formation on titanium surfaces than roughness. The presence of a pellicle coating may negate the impact of SFE on C. albicans biofilm formation on titanium surfaces.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体外白色念珠菌生物膜在不同钛表面形貌上的形成。
目的:探讨钛种植体表面形貌的差异对白色念珠菌生物膜形成的影响。材料和方法:制备钛盘,用轮廓仪进行表征:a组(R a 0.15µm,光滑),B组(R a 0.64µm,轻度粗糙),C组(R a 1.3µm,中度粗糙)。测定各组的接触角和表面自由能(SFE)。未经预处理的钛盘与白色念珠菌孵育24 h。在另外的实验中,钛盘最初用人唾液、牛血清白蛋白或磷酸盐缓冲盐水包被2小时,然后与白色念珠菌孵育24小时。用比色法定量真菌生物膜的形成量。结果:白色念珠菌生物膜形成明显降低(p < 0.05)。白色念珠菌的生物膜形成比其他两组明显。唾液涂层导致白色念珠菌粘附性增强,表面粗糙度增加。结论:与光滑和中等粗糙表面相比,轻度粗糙钛盘的SFE最低,白色念珠菌生物膜形成最少。本研究表明,白色念珠菌的生物膜形成以sfe依赖的方式增加。这些发现表明SFE可能比粗糙度更能解释白色念珠菌在钛表面形成生物膜的原因。膜膜涂层的存在可能会抵消SFE对钛表面白色念珠菌生物膜形成的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Recipient of Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry's Young Author Award 2023. Reliability and agreement of root length measurements during orthodontic treatment in images from different CBCT machines using multiplanar reconstruction. The sealing ability of different endodontic biomaterials as an intra-orifice barrier: evaluation with high-performance liquid chromatography. An in vitro study on the influence of laser-activated irrigation on infiltration and leakage of a dual curing-resin cement as an endodontic sealer Accumulation and removal of Streptococcus mutans biofilm on enamel and root surfaces in vitro
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1