Peri-implant bone resorption risk of anterior maxilla narrow single implants: a finite-element analysis.

Biomaterial investigations in dentistry Pub Date : 2022-10-25 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1080/26415275.2022.2135516
Ivan Onone Gialain, Leonardo Folmer Rodrigues da Silva, Marlene Kasumi Gantier Takano, Rafael Yagüe Ballester, Marina Guimarães Roscoe, Josete Barbosa Cruz Meira
{"title":"Peri-implant bone resorption risk of anterior maxilla narrow single implants: a finite-element analysis.","authors":"Ivan Onone Gialain,&nbsp;Leonardo Folmer Rodrigues da Silva,&nbsp;Marlene Kasumi Gantier Takano,&nbsp;Rafael Yagüe Ballester,&nbsp;Marina Guimarães Roscoe,&nbsp;Josete Barbosa Cruz Meira","doi":"10.1080/26415275.2022.2135516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Statement of the problem:</b> Narrow implants have been recommended in high esthetic demand regions to ensure greater buccal bone thickness (BBT) and minimize soft-tissue recession due to insufficient bone support. However, a limited area of bone-implant interface can increase the risk of peri-implant bone resorption due to occlusal forces. <b>Purpose:</b> This article encourages the use of evidence-based finite element analysis to optimize the aesthetic outcomes in maxillary lateral incisor single-supported implant crown by accurate biomechanical planning. This study aimed to analyze the best implant dimensions that would preserve the maximum BBT and avoid peri-implant bone resorption due to occlusal forces. <b>Materials and methods:</b> A maxilla segment was constructed based on anthropological measurements. Four implant diameters (Ø = 3.25; 3.50; 3.75 or 4.00 mm) and two lengths (<i>L</i> = 10 or 13 mm) were simulated. The occlusal force parameters were defined to simulate clinical conditions. The bone resorption risk analysis was based on Frost's mechanostat theory altering the strain output to strain energy density (SED). The peri-implant bone resorption risk indexes (PIBR<sub>ri</sub>) were calculated by dividing the average of the top ten SED elements of the cortical and trabecular buccal wall by the pathologic resorption limit for each bone. <b>Results:</b> For trabecular bone, only the model Ø4.00<sub>L13</sub> exhibited a low PIBR<sub>ri</sub>. For cortical bone, all models presented a low PIBR<sub>ri</sub>, except for models Ø3.25. <b>Conclusion:</b> The selection of a 3.25 mm dental implant to preserve a 2 mm BBT should be avoided since it generates a high peri-implant bone resorption risk induced by occlusal overload.</p>","PeriodicalId":72378,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"92-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9621276/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2022.2135516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Statement of the problem: Narrow implants have been recommended in high esthetic demand regions to ensure greater buccal bone thickness (BBT) and minimize soft-tissue recession due to insufficient bone support. However, a limited area of bone-implant interface can increase the risk of peri-implant bone resorption due to occlusal forces. Purpose: This article encourages the use of evidence-based finite element analysis to optimize the aesthetic outcomes in maxillary lateral incisor single-supported implant crown by accurate biomechanical planning. This study aimed to analyze the best implant dimensions that would preserve the maximum BBT and avoid peri-implant bone resorption due to occlusal forces. Materials and methods: A maxilla segment was constructed based on anthropological measurements. Four implant diameters (Ø = 3.25; 3.50; 3.75 or 4.00 mm) and two lengths (L = 10 or 13 mm) were simulated. The occlusal force parameters were defined to simulate clinical conditions. The bone resorption risk analysis was based on Frost's mechanostat theory altering the strain output to strain energy density (SED). The peri-implant bone resorption risk indexes (PIBRri) were calculated by dividing the average of the top ten SED elements of the cortical and trabecular buccal wall by the pathologic resorption limit for each bone. Results: For trabecular bone, only the model Ø4.00L13 exhibited a low PIBRri. For cortical bone, all models presented a low PIBRri, except for models Ø3.25. Conclusion: The selection of a 3.25 mm dental implant to preserve a 2 mm BBT should be avoided since it generates a high peri-implant bone resorption risk induced by occlusal overload.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
上颌前牙狭窄单种植体种植周骨吸收风险的有限元分析。
问题说明:窄种植体被推荐用于高审美要求的区域,以确保更大的颊骨厚度(BBT),并最大限度地减少由于骨支持不足导致的软组织衰退。然而,由于咬合力的作用,有限的骨-种植体界面面积会增加种植体周围骨吸收的风险。目的:本文鼓励采用循证有限元分析,通过精确的生物力学规划,优化上颌侧切牙单支种植冠的美观效果。本研究旨在分析最佳种植体尺寸,以保持最大的BBT,避免由于咬合力导致种植体周围骨吸收。材料与方法:在人类学测量的基础上构建上颌骨节段。4个种植体直径(Ø = 3.25;3.50;3.75或4.00 mm)和两种长度(L = 10或13 mm)进行模拟。确定牙合力参数以模拟临床情况。骨吸收风险分析基于Frost的恒力理论,改变应变输出到应变能密度(SED)。将骨皮质和骨小梁颊壁前10个SED元素的平均值除以每块骨的病理吸收极限,计算种植体周围骨吸收风险指数(PIBRri)。结果:对于小梁骨,只有Ø4.00L13模型表现出较低的PIBRri。对于皮质骨,除Ø3.25模型外,所有模型的PIBRri均较低。结论:应避免选择3.25 mm种植体来保留2 mm的BBT,因为它会产生由咬合负荷引起的高种植体周围骨吸收风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Root-filling materials for endodontic surgery: biological and clinical aspects. Silane and acid etch cross contamination of dentin and composite reduced µ-tensile bond strength. Recipient of Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry's Young Author Award 2023. Reliability and agreement of root length measurements during orthodontic treatment in images from different CBCT machines using multiplanar reconstruction. The sealing ability of different endodontic biomaterials as an intra-orifice barrier: evaluation with high-performance liquid chromatography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1