Is counting hindering learning? An investigation into children’s proficiency with simple addition and their flexibility with mental computation strategies

IF 2 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Mathematical Thinking and Learning Pub Date : 2020-11-11 DOI:10.1080/10986065.2020.1842968
S. Hopkins, J. Russo, R. Siegler
{"title":"Is counting hindering learning? An investigation into children’s proficiency with simple addition and their flexibility with mental computation strategies","authors":"S. Hopkins, J. Russo, R. Siegler","doi":"10.1080/10986065.2020.1842968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT There is a growing awareness that many children are not developing fast and accurate retrieval-based strategies for solving single-digit addition problems. In this study we individually assessed 166 third and fourth grade children to identify a group of children (called accurate-min-counters) who frequently solved simple single-digit addition problems using a min-counting strategy and were accurate using it. We investigated if these children were adaptive when it came to using retrieval for simple addition and if they were disadvantaged when it came to demonstrating mental computational flexibility with multi-digit addition. We found accurate-min-counters represented over 30% of participants. These children were often incorrect when they were required to use retrieval for simple addition and were less flexible than most peers with mental computation strategies. The findings indicate that educators should be concerned about the prevalence of accurate-min-counting and call into question the widely held view that it is mostly children with a mathematics learning disability (or persistent low achievement) who display the protracted use of counting-based strategies for simple addition. Further research is needed to investigate if, and how, current teaching approaches are encouraging children to rely on counting beyond a time when it is advantageous to do so.","PeriodicalId":46800,"journal":{"name":"Mathematical Thinking and Learning","volume":"24 1","pages":"52 - 69"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10986065.2020.1842968","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematical Thinking and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1842968","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT There is a growing awareness that many children are not developing fast and accurate retrieval-based strategies for solving single-digit addition problems. In this study we individually assessed 166 third and fourth grade children to identify a group of children (called accurate-min-counters) who frequently solved simple single-digit addition problems using a min-counting strategy and were accurate using it. We investigated if these children were adaptive when it came to using retrieval for simple addition and if they were disadvantaged when it came to demonstrating mental computational flexibility with multi-digit addition. We found accurate-min-counters represented over 30% of participants. These children were often incorrect when they were required to use retrieval for simple addition and were less flexible than most peers with mental computation strategies. The findings indicate that educators should be concerned about the prevalence of accurate-min-counting and call into question the widely held view that it is mostly children with a mathematics learning disability (or persistent low achievement) who display the protracted use of counting-based strategies for simple addition. Further research is needed to investigate if, and how, current teaching approaches are encouraging children to rely on counting beyond a time when it is advantageous to do so.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数数会妨碍学习吗?儿童简单加法能力和心理计算策略灵活性的调查
摘要人们越来越意识到,许多儿童没有开发出快速准确的基于检索的策略来解决个位数加法问题。在这项研究中,我们对166名三年级和四年级的儿童进行了单独评估,以确定一组经常使用最小计数策略解决简单个位数加法问题并且使用它是准确的儿童(称为精确最小计数器)。我们调查了这些孩子在使用检索进行简单加法时是否具有适应性,以及在使用多位数加法展示心理计算灵活性时是否处于不利地位。我们发现准确的最小计数器代表了超过30%的参与者。当要求这些孩子使用检索进行简单加法时,他们往往是不正确的,并且与大多数具有心理计算策略的同龄人相比,他们的灵活性较差。研究结果表明,教育工作者应该关注准确计数的普遍性,并对人们普遍认为的观点提出质疑,即大多数有数学学习障碍(或持续低成绩)的儿童长期使用基于计数的策略进行简单加法。需要进一步的研究来调查目前的教学方法是否以及如何鼓励孩子们在有利于计数的时间之后再进行计数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mathematical Thinking and Learning
Mathematical Thinking and Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Second-order covariation: enlarging the theoretical framework of covariational reasoning An examination of Japanese curriculum materials through quantitative and covariational reasoning: the treatment of linear functions Mathematical literacy in context Interference of prototypical geometry representations in students’ construction of concepts and development of proofs Sustaining quantitatively-grounded meanings for definite integrals in high school calculus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1