Higher education leaders’ perspectives of accessible and inclusive online learning

IF 3.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Distance Education Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.1080/01587919.2022.2141608
Amy Lomellini, Patrick R. Lowenthal, C. Snelson, J. Trespalacios
{"title":"Higher education leaders’ perspectives of accessible and inclusive online learning","authors":"Amy Lomellini, Patrick R. Lowenthal, C. Snelson, J. Trespalacios","doi":"10.1080/01587919.2022.2141608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Online learning can potentially meet increasingly diverse students’ needs in higher education, including disabled students. However, institutions have historically struggled in providing accessible and inclusive online learning. Higher education online learning leaders, those who manage instructional designers, are in a unique position to help institutions strategize and create accessible and inclusive online courses. In this qualitative study, we interviewed nine higher education online learning leaders to understand leaders’ perceptions about how institutions provide accessible and inclusive online learning. Results demonstrated that despite varying conceptualizations of accessibility and inclusivity, online learning leaders perceive an insufficient but growing emphasis in higher education. Overall, participants described instructional designers as the most knowledgeable and skilled in this area. Participants described a lack of agency for instructional design teams and a need to advocate for buy-in from senior leadership. They also described strategies (e.g., faculty development, quality standards, and accessibility checkers) to support faculty.","PeriodicalId":51514,"journal":{"name":"Distance Education","volume":"43 1","pages":"574 - 595"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Distance Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2022.2141608","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Online learning can potentially meet increasingly diverse students’ needs in higher education, including disabled students. However, institutions have historically struggled in providing accessible and inclusive online learning. Higher education online learning leaders, those who manage instructional designers, are in a unique position to help institutions strategize and create accessible and inclusive online courses. In this qualitative study, we interviewed nine higher education online learning leaders to understand leaders’ perceptions about how institutions provide accessible and inclusive online learning. Results demonstrated that despite varying conceptualizations of accessibility and inclusivity, online learning leaders perceive an insufficient but growing emphasis in higher education. Overall, participants described instructional designers as the most knowledgeable and skilled in this area. Participants described a lack of agency for instructional design teams and a need to advocate for buy-in from senior leadership. They also described strategies (e.g., faculty development, quality standards, and accessibility checkers) to support faculty.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高等教育领导者对无障碍和包容性在线学习的看法
摘要在线学习有可能满足高等教育中日益多样化的学生需求,包括残疾学生。然而,各机构在提供无障碍和包容性的在线学习方面历来举步维艰。高等教育在线学习领导者,即那些管理教学设计师的人,在帮助机构制定战略和创建可访问和包容性的在线课程方面处于独特的地位。在这项定性研究中,我们采访了九位高等教育在线学习领导者,以了解领导者对机构如何提供无障碍和包容性在线学习的看法。结果表明,尽管对可及性和包容性的概念各不相同,但在线学习领导者认为高等教育的重视程度不够,但越来越高。总体而言,参与者将教学设计师描述为该领域知识最渊博、技术最熟练的设计师。参与者描述了教学设计团队缺乏代理权,需要倡导高层领导的支持。他们还描述了支持教师的策略(例如,教师发展、质量标准和可访问性检查)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Distance Education
Distance Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
6.80%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Distance Education, a peer-reviewed journal affiliated with the Open and Distance Learning Association of Australia, Inc., is dedicated to publishing research and scholarly content in the realm of open, distance, and flexible education. Focusing on the freedom of learners from constraints in time, pace, and place of study, the journal has been a pioneering source in these educational domains. It continues to contribute original and scholarly work, playing a crucial role in advancing knowledge and practice in open and distance learning.
期刊最新文献
Psychometric properties of the Online Learner Satisfaction Instrument (OLSI): construct validity, convergent validity, and measurement invariance The role of teaching presence in students’ behavioral engagement The dynamics of role evolution in online learning communities Exploring instructors’ cultural presence in online course design and delivery Examining online university classrooms through emotion work and feeling currencies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1