The Climate of Orlando: Woolf, Braidotti and the Anthropocene

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE Comparative Critical Studies Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.3366/ccs.2022.0444
Peter Adkins
{"title":"The Climate of Orlando: Woolf, Braidotti and the Anthropocene","authors":"Peter Adkins","doi":"10.3366/ccs.2022.0444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay brings Rosi Braidotti’s recent writing on the Anthropocene into dialogue with Woolf’s writing on climate in her novel Orlando (1928). As critics are beginning to notice, Woolf’s novel presents the reader with vicissitudes in ‘the English climate’ that parallel Orlando’s own personal transformations, presenting itself as an early outlier of climate fiction (‘cli-fi’). Less remarked upon is the radical understanding of materialism that informs Woolf’s presentation of the interrelation between human life and broader nonhuman entities and systems. This article reads Woolf’s material ontology, in which humans, weather systems and environments are irreversibly entangled, alongside Braidotti’s ‘monistic approach to subjectivity’, arguing that in both we find a similar attempt to articulate a non-anthropocentric worldview which nonetheless remains alert to political and ethical issues within human society. Showing how Woolf actively historicizes the Anthropocene in Orlando, I contend that not only can Braidotti’s work help to articulate Woolf’s materialism, but that Woolf’s attention to the sexual politics of climate change provides depth to Braidotti’s posthuman feminism.","PeriodicalId":42644,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Critical Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Critical Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/ccs.2022.0444","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay brings Rosi Braidotti’s recent writing on the Anthropocene into dialogue with Woolf’s writing on climate in her novel Orlando (1928). As critics are beginning to notice, Woolf’s novel presents the reader with vicissitudes in ‘the English climate’ that parallel Orlando’s own personal transformations, presenting itself as an early outlier of climate fiction (‘cli-fi’). Less remarked upon is the radical understanding of materialism that informs Woolf’s presentation of the interrelation between human life and broader nonhuman entities and systems. This article reads Woolf’s material ontology, in which humans, weather systems and environments are irreversibly entangled, alongside Braidotti’s ‘monistic approach to subjectivity’, arguing that in both we find a similar attempt to articulate a non-anthropocentric worldview which nonetheless remains alert to political and ethical issues within human society. Showing how Woolf actively historicizes the Anthropocene in Orlando, I contend that not only can Braidotti’s work help to articulate Woolf’s materialism, but that Woolf’s attention to the sexual politics of climate change provides depth to Braidotti’s posthuman feminism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奥兰多的气候:伍尔夫,布雷多蒂和人类世
这篇文章将罗西·布雷多蒂最近关于人类世的写作与伍尔夫在她的小说《奥兰多》(1928)中关于气候的写作进行了对话。正如评论家们开始注意到的那样,伍尔夫的小说向读者展示了“英国气候”中的沧桑,与奥兰多自己的个人转变相似,将自己呈现为气候小说(“气候小说”)的早期异类。伍尔夫对人类生活和更广泛的非人类实体和系统之间的相互关系的表现,体现在对唯物主义的激进理解上,这一点较少被提及。本文阅读了伍尔夫的物质本体论,其中人类、天气系统和环境不可逆转地纠缠在一起,以及布雷多蒂的“主体性一元论”,认为我们在两者中都发现了类似的尝试,即阐明一种非人类中心主义的世界观,尽管如此,它仍然对人类社会中的政治和伦理问题保持警惕。为了展示伍尔夫如何积极地将奥兰多的人类世历史化,我认为,不仅布里多蒂的作品有助于阐明伍尔夫的唯物主义,而且伍尔夫对气候变化的性政治的关注也为布里多蒂的后人类女权主义提供了深度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Comparing Translations of Dante’s Commedia Pasolini and Minor Comparativism: Transnationalizing Dialect Poetry Structural Comparison, Transfers and Unequal Power Relations: Field Theory as a Conceptual and Methodological Tool Decolonizing Comparative Literature Comp Lit’s Other Half: In Defense of Literature, with Lao She
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1