{"title":"The Allure of Synthesis: Science and the Literary in Comparative and World Literature","authors":"Alessio Mattana","doi":"10.3366/ccs.2020.0369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article offers a reconstruction of the scientific lineage of comparative and world literature. It will be argued that the approaches by Philarète Chasles and Johann Wolfgang von Goethe were influenced by the meaning of ‘comparative’ developed in scientific texts in the long eighteenth century. Building on the assumption that literature may be made into a hard science, a number of nineteenth-century comparatists then sought to elaborate syntheses of literature in the form of universal laws that would hold to all literary texts. I argue that this ‘scientifying’ approach to literature is still at work to this day, and I conclude my intervention by pointing to the epistemological issues that must be considered when the literary is treated scientifically.","PeriodicalId":42644,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Critical Studies","volume":"17 1","pages":"351-372"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Critical Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/ccs.2020.0369","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This article offers a reconstruction of the scientific lineage of comparative and world literature. It will be argued that the approaches by Philarète Chasles and Johann Wolfgang von Goethe were influenced by the meaning of ‘comparative’ developed in scientific texts in the long eighteenth century. Building on the assumption that literature may be made into a hard science, a number of nineteenth-century comparatists then sought to elaborate syntheses of literature in the form of universal laws that would hold to all literary texts. I argue that this ‘scientifying’ approach to literature is still at work to this day, and I conclude my intervention by pointing to the epistemological issues that must be considered when the literary is treated scientifically.
本文对比较文学和世界文学的科学谱系进行了重建。有人认为,Philarète Chasles和Johann Wolfgang von Goethe的方法受到了18世纪科学文本中“比较”含义的影响。基于文学可能成为一门硬科学的假设,一些19世纪的比较主义者随后试图以适用于所有文学文本的普遍规律的形式来阐述文学的综合。我认为,这种“科学化”的文学方法至今仍在发挥作用,我在结束我的干预时指出了科学对待文学时必须考虑的认识论问题。