From Durkheim to Jellinek

Q2 Arts and Humanities Durkheimian Studies/Etudes durkheimiennes Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.3167/ds.2022.260102
Jean-Louis Halpérin
{"title":"From Durkheim to Jellinek","authors":"Jean-Louis Halpérin","doi":"10.3167/ds.2022.260102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIn his 1887 report about the positivist science of morals in Germany, Durkheim referred to two books: Der Zweck im Recht by Rudolf von Jhering and Die socialetische Bedeutung von Recht, Unrecht und Strafe by Georg von Jellinek. Despite the absence of commentary from Durkheim about this 1878 book from the ‘young’ Jellinek (later known as a master of public law), the analysis of this dissertation (rejected by the University of Vienna) shows that it contained a claim for a social-science-inspired understanding of crime and penalty and had some points of contact with Durkheim's argumentation, notably about the importance of religious feelings in the social reaction against crimes. The article proposes to deepen this comparison between Jellinek's and Durkheim's books with an investigation about their indirect sources.","PeriodicalId":35254,"journal":{"name":"Durkheimian Studies/Etudes durkheimiennes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Durkheimian Studies/Etudes durkheimiennes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/ds.2022.260102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In his 1887 report about the positivist science of morals in Germany, Durkheim referred to two books: Der Zweck im Recht by Rudolf von Jhering and Die socialetische Bedeutung von Recht, Unrecht und Strafe by Georg von Jellinek. Despite the absence of commentary from Durkheim about this 1878 book from the ‘young’ Jellinek (later known as a master of public law), the analysis of this dissertation (rejected by the University of Vienna) shows that it contained a claim for a social-science-inspired understanding of crime and penalty and had some points of contact with Durkheim's argumentation, notably about the importance of religious feelings in the social reaction against crimes. The article proposes to deepen this comparison between Jellinek's and Durkheim's books with an investigation about their indirect sources.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从涂尔干到耶利内克
在他1887年关于德国实证主义道德科学的报告中,迪尔凯姆提到了两本书:鲁道夫·冯·耶林的《道德之路》和格奥尔格·冯·耶利内克的《社会之路、道德之路和战略》。尽管迪尔凯姆对“年轻的”耶利内克(后来被称为公法硕士)1878年出版的这本书没有评论,但对这篇论文(被维也纳大学拒绝)的分析表明,它包含了一种社会科学启发的对犯罪和惩罚的理解的主张,并且与迪尔凯姆的论点有一些联系,特别是关于宗教情感在社会对犯罪的反应中的重要性。本文建议通过对耶利内克和迪尔凯姆的间接来源的调查来加深对他们著作的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Durkheimian Studies/Etudes durkheimiennes
Durkheimian Studies/Etudes durkheimiennes Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Crime et religion chez Durkheim From Durkheim to Jellinek ‘La justice est pleine de charité’, ou la ‘révélation’ d'Émile Durkheim vue par Gaston Richard Émile Durkheim et la sociologie des religions Il faut traiter les faits religieux comme des choses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1