Revealed preference analysis and bounded rationality

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Oxford Economic Papers-New Series Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI:10.1093/oep/gpab018
Eileen Tipoe, Abi Adams, Ian Crawford
{"title":"Revealed preference analysis and bounded rationality","authors":"Eileen Tipoe, Abi Adams, Ian Crawford","doi":"10.1093/oep/gpab018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The principle of revealed preference is the backbone of structural empirical work on consumer demand. It focuses on what we can learn about the processes by which economic agents make decisions, using observed choices and minimal auxiliary assumptions. Classical revealed preference methods assume that choices and preferences are stable and consistent, but many studies have found violations of these assumptions both in consumer data and experimental settings. Recent research effort extends far beyond the axiomatic characterization of neoclassical choice models. New behavioural theories explain these violations in a theoretically founded way, considering data consistency and preference recoverability for a wide class of behavioural models. This article reviews some of the themes emerging from the recent literature.","PeriodicalId":48092,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Economic Papers-New Series","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Economic Papers-New Series","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpab018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The principle of revealed preference is the backbone of structural empirical work on consumer demand. It focuses on what we can learn about the processes by which economic agents make decisions, using observed choices and minimal auxiliary assumptions. Classical revealed preference methods assume that choices and preferences are stable and consistent, but many studies have found violations of these assumptions both in consumer data and experimental settings. Recent research effort extends far beyond the axiomatic characterization of neoclassical choice models. New behavioural theories explain these violations in a theoretically founded way, considering data consistency and preference recoverability for a wide class of behavioural models. This article reviews some of the themes emerging from the recent literature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭示偏好分析与有限理性
显性偏好原则是消费者需求结构性实证工作的支柱。它关注的是我们可以从经济主体通过观察到的选择和最小的辅助假设做出决策的过程中学到什么。经典的揭示偏好方法假设选择和偏好是稳定和一致的,但许多研究发现在消费者数据和实验环境中都违反了这些假设。最近的研究工作远远超出了新古典选择模型的公理化特征。新的行为理论以一种理论建立的方式解释了这些违规行为,考虑了数据一致性和偏好可恢复性,为广泛的行为模型。本文回顾了最近文献中出现的一些主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Oxford Economic Papers is a general economics journal, publishing refereed papers in economic theory, applied economics, econometrics, economic development, economic history, and the history of economic thought. It occasionally publishes survey articles in addition to original papers. Books are not reviewed, but substantial review articles are considered. The journal occasionally publishes survey articles in addition to original papers, and occasionally publishes special issues or symposia.
期刊最新文献
Endogenous learning in international environmental agreements: the impact of research spillovers and the degree of cooperation International co-movements of inflation, 1851–1913 Banking structural reforms and top income shares: regulate or deregulate? Public- and private-sector jobs: a cross-country perspective Identifying literacy and numeracy skill mismatch in OECD countries using the job analysis method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1