A. Pinto, A. Hapsari, Julia W Ho, C. Meaney, L. Avery, Nadha Hassen, A. Jetha, A. Lay, M. Rotondi, Dan Zuberi
{"title":"Precarious work among personal support workers in the Greater Toronto Area: a respondent-driven sampling study","authors":"A. Pinto, A. Hapsari, Julia W Ho, C. Meaney, L. Avery, Nadha Hassen, A. Jetha, A. Lay, M. Rotondi, Dan Zuberi","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20210338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the role of personal support workers (PSWs) in health care, as well as their work conditions. Our study aimed to understand the characteristics of the PSW workforce, their work conditions and their job security, as well as to explore the health of PSWs and the impact of precarious employment on their health. Methods: Our community-based participatory action research focused on PSWs in the Greater Toronto Area. We administered an online, cross-sectional survey between June and December 2020 using respondent-driven sampling. Data on sociodemographics, employment precarity, worker empowerment and health status were collected. We assessed the association between precarious employment and health using multivariable logistic regression models. Results: We contacted 739 PSWs, and 664 consented to participate. Overall, 658 (99.1%) completed at least part of the survey. Using data adjusted for our sampling approach, the participants were predominantly Black (76.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 68.2%–84.9%), women (90.1%, 95% CI 85.1%–95.1%) and born outside of Canada (97.4%, 95% CI 94.9%–99.9%). Most worked in home care (43.9%, 95% CI 35.2%–52.5%) or long-term care (34.5%, 95% CI 27.4%–42.0%). Although most participants had at least some postsecondary education (unadjusted proportion = 83.4%, n = 529), more than half were considered low income (55.1%, 95% CI 46.3%–63.9%). Most participants were precariously employed (86.5%, 95% CI 80.7%–92.4%) and lacked paid sick days (89.5%, 95% CI 85.8%–93.3%) or extended health benefits (74.1%, 95% CI 66.8%–81.4%). Nearly half of the participants described their health as less than very good (46.7%, 95% CI 37.9%–55.5%). Employment precarity was significantly associated with higher risk of depression (odds ratio 1.02, 95% CI 1.01–1.03). Interpretation: Despite being key members of health care teams, most PSWs were precariously employed with low wages that keep them in poverty; the poor work conditions they faced could be detrimental to their physical and mental health. Equitable strategies are needed to provide decent work conditions for PSWs and to improve their health.","PeriodicalId":93946,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CMAJ open","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20210338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the role of personal support workers (PSWs) in health care, as well as their work conditions. Our study aimed to understand the characteristics of the PSW workforce, their work conditions and their job security, as well as to explore the health of PSWs and the impact of precarious employment on their health. Methods: Our community-based participatory action research focused on PSWs in the Greater Toronto Area. We administered an online, cross-sectional survey between June and December 2020 using respondent-driven sampling. Data on sociodemographics, employment precarity, worker empowerment and health status were collected. We assessed the association between precarious employment and health using multivariable logistic regression models. Results: We contacted 739 PSWs, and 664 consented to participate. Overall, 658 (99.1%) completed at least part of the survey. Using data adjusted for our sampling approach, the participants were predominantly Black (76.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 68.2%–84.9%), women (90.1%, 95% CI 85.1%–95.1%) and born outside of Canada (97.4%, 95% CI 94.9%–99.9%). Most worked in home care (43.9%, 95% CI 35.2%–52.5%) or long-term care (34.5%, 95% CI 27.4%–42.0%). Although most participants had at least some postsecondary education (unadjusted proportion = 83.4%, n = 529), more than half were considered low income (55.1%, 95% CI 46.3%–63.9%). Most participants were precariously employed (86.5%, 95% CI 80.7%–92.4%) and lacked paid sick days (89.5%, 95% CI 85.8%–93.3%) or extended health benefits (74.1%, 95% CI 66.8%–81.4%). Nearly half of the participants described their health as less than very good (46.7%, 95% CI 37.9%–55.5%). Employment precarity was significantly associated with higher risk of depression (odds ratio 1.02, 95% CI 1.01–1.03). Interpretation: Despite being key members of health care teams, most PSWs were precariously employed with low wages that keep them in poverty; the poor work conditions they faced could be detrimental to their physical and mental health. Equitable strategies are needed to provide decent work conditions for PSWs and to improve their health.
背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行凸显了个人支持工作者(psw)在卫生保健中的作用及其工作条件。本研究旨在了解社会福利工作者的特点、工作条件和工作保障,探讨社会福利工作者的健康状况和不稳定就业对其健康的影响。方法:我们以社区为基础的参与式行动研究重点是在大多伦多地区的社会福利工作者。我们在2020年6月至12月期间使用受访者驱动的抽样进行了一项在线横断面调查。收集了关于社会人口统计、就业不稳定、工人赋权和健康状况的数据。我们使用多变量逻辑回归模型评估了不稳定就业与健康之间的关系。结果:我们联系了739名psw, 664名psw同意参与。总体而言,658人(99.1%)至少完成了部分调查。使用我们的抽样方法调整的数据,参与者主要是黑人(76.5%,95%置信区间[CI] 68.2%-84.9%),女性(90.1%,95% CI 85.1%-95.1%)和加拿大以外出生的人(97.4%,95% CI 94.9%-99.9%)。大多数在家庭护理(43.9%,95% CI 35.2%-52.5%)或长期护理(34.5%,95% CI 27.4%-42.0%)工作。虽然大多数参与者至少接受过一些高等教育(未调整比例= 83.4%,n = 529),但超过一半的人被认为是低收入的(55.1%,95% CI 46.3%-63.9%)。大多数参与者就业不稳定(86.5%,95% CI 80.7%-92.4%),缺乏带薪病假(89.5%,95% CI 85.8%-93.3%)或延长健康福利(74.1%,95% CI 66.8%-81.4%)。近一半的参与者认为他们的健康状况不是很好(46.7%,95% CI 37.9%-55.5%)。就业不稳定与较高的抑郁风险显著相关(优势比1.02,95% CI 1.01-1.03)。解释:尽管是保健队的主要成员,但大多数社会福利工作者的工作不稳定,工资低,使他们处于贫困状态;他们所面临的恶劣工作条件可能有害于他们的身心健康。需要制定公平的战略,为社会福利妇女提供体面的工作条件,改善她们的健康。