Keep Forgetting to Make a Shopping List? Don’t Beat Yourself up over It!

Kendra J Morrissette, J. Lusk
{"title":"Keep Forgetting to Make a Shopping List? Don’t Beat Yourself up over It!","authors":"Kendra J Morrissette, J. Lusk","doi":"10.1080/10454446.2022.2042758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study aims to determine the impact of shopping lists on consumer spending and healthy shopping behaviors. A non-hypothetical field experiment was conducted, using the online platform Amazon Mechanical Turks, to determine the value 228 consumers place on these self commitment devices via their willingness-to-accept (to give up their list) or equivalent gain (to write a list) for a shopping list during a grocery shopping trip. By randomly determining who kept and who gave up shopping lists, we are able to explore causal effects of lists on food spending and the healthiness of food purchases. We find that after controlling for conscientiousness, consumers willingness-to-accept to give up their shopping list is $5.05, while the equivalent gain to write a shopping list is $3.87. We did not however find a significant difference in the healthiness of the purchases made by consumers using a shopping list versus those without. There is a lack of prior research on this topic – particularly papers that use a random assignment to treatment. Previous studies have explored correlations between shopping list use and spending; however, this study provides a value of list use, utilizes a credible approach to determine impact of list use disentangled from unobserved confounds, and provides insights on impact of shopping lists on healthy eating.","PeriodicalId":15827,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Products Marketing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Products Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2022.2042758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study aims to determine the impact of shopping lists on consumer spending and healthy shopping behaviors. A non-hypothetical field experiment was conducted, using the online platform Amazon Mechanical Turks, to determine the value 228 consumers place on these self commitment devices via their willingness-to-accept (to give up their list) or equivalent gain (to write a list) for a shopping list during a grocery shopping trip. By randomly determining who kept and who gave up shopping lists, we are able to explore causal effects of lists on food spending and the healthiness of food purchases. We find that after controlling for conscientiousness, consumers willingness-to-accept to give up their shopping list is $5.05, while the equivalent gain to write a shopping list is $3.87. We did not however find a significant difference in the healthiness of the purchases made by consumers using a shopping list versus those without. There is a lack of prior research on this topic – particularly papers that use a random assignment to treatment. Previous studies have explored correlations between shopping list use and spending; however, this study provides a value of list use, utilizes a credible approach to determine impact of list use disentangled from unobserved confounds, and provides insights on impact of shopping lists on healthy eating.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
总是忘记列购物清单?不要因此而自责!
摘要本研究旨在探讨购物清单对消费者支出和健康购物行为的影响。利用在线平台亚马逊机械土耳其人(Amazon Mechanical Turks)进行了一项非假设的现场实验,以确定228名消费者在购物旅行中对购物清单的接受意愿(放弃清单)或等效收益(写清单),从而确定他们对这些自我承诺设备的价值。通过随机决定谁保留和放弃购物清单,我们能够探索清单对食品消费和食品购买健康的因果影响。我们发现,在控制责任心后,消费者愿意接受放弃购物清单的收益为5.05美元,而编写购物清单的收益为3.87美元。然而,我们没有发现使用购物清单的消费者与不使用购物清单的消费者在购物的健康程度上有显著差异。在此之前,缺乏对这一主题的研究,特别是使用随机分配治疗的论文。之前的研究已经探索了购物清单的使用和消费之间的关系;然而,本研究提供了清单使用的价值,利用一种可信的方法来确定清单使用的影响,从未观察到的混淆中解脱出来,并提供了购物清单对健康饮食影响的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: From food promotion and advertising through new food product development and consumer behavior research, the Journal of Food Products Marketing provides timely, practical articles that keep food marketers on the cutting edge of their profession. The journal includes refereed research studies as well as opinions, guidelines, and speeches by practitioners that contribute to the better practice and understanding of food marketing. The journal provides a single forum for both food marketing academicians and food marketing practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Designing Package Labels for Upcycled Food Products in Japan: Case Study of Broccoli Stem Snack Food Safety Risk and Visual Attention: The Moderating Effect of Prototype Perception and Social Distance Meatless Revolution: Exploring Consumers’ Perception of Meat Alternatives Requirements of Environmentally-Aware Consumers on the Implementation and Communication of Sustainability Measures in the Beverage Industry: A Qualitative Kano-Model Approach Cheers! Examining Message Congruency Effects for No/low-Alcohol Beer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1