Circe’s Garden: Rewriting Epic and Revolutionary Time

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE Comparative Critical Studies Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI:10.3366/ccs.2022.0422
Anna Rivers
{"title":"Circe’s Garden: Rewriting Epic and Revolutionary Time","authors":"Anna Rivers","doi":"10.3366/ccs.2022.0422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on two retellings of the story of Circe, the witch from Homer's Odyssey, exploring Augusta Webster's 1870 dramatic monologue ‘Circe’ and Madeline Miller's 2018 novel of the same name. In both texts Circe's main motivation is to escape from the island, depicted as an idyllic garden, where she has been exiled by the gods. This escape comes to symbolize movement towards revolutionary feminist change; however, there is no possibility of describing what form the escape will take according to existing discourses, suggesting paradoxically that change can only be represented through a failure of all forms of representation. This poses a difficulty in terms of conceptualizing practical social transformation. Michel Foucault's power-knowledge dialectic and Gilles Deleuze's work on virtuality are deployed here to illustrate how ideas of change and newness can be conceptualized from within the system purporting to be changed. Revolution etymologically suggests a recurring back to an idealized state of nature while simultaneously functioning as an invocation of utopian change and the progressively new. Circe's immortality functions as a symbol for this cultural paralysis but the garden represents a way of thinking beyond it. The garden is a space which purports to control or contain temporal and aesthetic movement. However, in fact this space encourages the risk of change in ways which threaten this control, or at least model how containment could be destabilized. For Circe, the garden is thus a platform from which subjective revolutionary possibilities can be modelled in preparation for application to the material world.","PeriodicalId":42644,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Critical Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Critical Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/ccs.2022.0422","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article focuses on two retellings of the story of Circe, the witch from Homer's Odyssey, exploring Augusta Webster's 1870 dramatic monologue ‘Circe’ and Madeline Miller's 2018 novel of the same name. In both texts Circe's main motivation is to escape from the island, depicted as an idyllic garden, where she has been exiled by the gods. This escape comes to symbolize movement towards revolutionary feminist change; however, there is no possibility of describing what form the escape will take according to existing discourses, suggesting paradoxically that change can only be represented through a failure of all forms of representation. This poses a difficulty in terms of conceptualizing practical social transformation. Michel Foucault's power-knowledge dialectic and Gilles Deleuze's work on virtuality are deployed here to illustrate how ideas of change and newness can be conceptualized from within the system purporting to be changed. Revolution etymologically suggests a recurring back to an idealized state of nature while simultaneously functioning as an invocation of utopian change and the progressively new. Circe's immortality functions as a symbol for this cultural paralysis but the garden represents a way of thinking beyond it. The garden is a space which purports to control or contain temporal and aesthetic movement. However, in fact this space encourages the risk of change in ways which threaten this control, or at least model how containment could be destabilized. For Circe, the garden is thus a platform from which subjective revolutionary possibilities can be modelled in preparation for application to the material world.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Circe的花园:改写史诗与革命时代
本文重点对荷马奥德赛中的女巫茜茜的故事进行了两次复述,探讨了奥古斯塔·韦伯斯特1870年的戏剧独白《茜茜》和玛德琳·米勒2018年的同名小说。在这两本书中,Circe的主要动机都是逃离这个被描绘成田园诗般花园的岛屿,在那里她被众神放逐。这种逃离象征着女权主义变革的革命性运动;然而,根据现有的话语,不可能描述逃跑将采取什么形式,这矛盾地表明,只有通过所有形式的表征的失败才能表征变化。这给实际社会转型的概念化带来了困难。米歇尔·福柯的权力知识辩证法和吉勒·德勒兹关于虚拟性的工作被部署在这里,以说明如何从声称要改变的系统中概念化变化和新的思想。从词源学上讲,革命意味着回归理想化的自然状态,同时又是乌托邦式变革和不断创新的召唤。Circe的不朽是这种文化瘫痪的象征,但花园代表了一种超越它的思维方式。花园是一个旨在控制或包含时间和美学运动的空间。然而,事实上,这个空间鼓励了改变的风险,威胁到了这种控制,或者至少模拟了遏制如何不稳定。因此,对Circe来说,花园是一个平台,可以从中模拟主观的革命性可能性,为应用于物质世界做准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Comparing Translations of Dante’s Commedia Pasolini and Minor Comparativism: Transnationalizing Dialect Poetry Structural Comparison, Transfers and Unequal Power Relations: Field Theory as a Conceptual and Methodological Tool Decolonizing Comparative Literature Comp Lit’s Other Half: In Defense of Literature, with Lao She
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1