Assessing the incorporation of battery degradation in vehicle-to-grid optimization models

Q2 Energy Energy Informatics Pub Date : 2023-10-19 DOI:10.1186/s42162-023-00288-x
Valentin Preis, Florian Biedenbach
{"title":"Assessing the incorporation of battery degradation in vehicle-to-grid optimization models","authors":"Valentin Preis,&nbsp;Florian Biedenbach","doi":"10.1186/s42162-023-00288-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Bidirectional charging allows energy from the electric vehicles (EV) to be fed back into the grid, offering the possibility of price-optimized charging. However, such strategies cause higher charging cycles, which affect the cyclic aging of the battery and reduce its service life, resulting in additional costs for the user. Various approaches are used to account for battery degradation in optimizations models of bidirectional charging use-cases. In this paper, a systematic literature review is carried out to identify existing battery degradation models and to determine the most suitable one. In the models under review, degradation is integrated into the optimization’s objective function. The review shows that there are mainly two strategies suitable for vehicle-to-grid (V2G) optimization problems: A weighted Ah-throughput model (wAh-model) with a constant degradation cost factor and a performance based model (pb-model) linking the degradation to measurable parameters such as capacity loss. Both models were implemented and analyzed. The results show that the wAh-model is the better optimization option, as in the pb-model the current state of health of the battery has an excessively large impact on the calculated degradation cost. It leads to excess costs due to a higher aging rate at the beginning of life which proves to be not ideal in the optimization. The sensitivity analysis reveals that altering the initial State of Health (SoH) from 95 % in the base scenario to 100 % leads to an increase in average degradation costs by factor 9.71 in the pb-model. From the evaluated base scenario the average degradation costs for the pb-model are 0.45 cent/kWh and for the wAh-model 0.23 cent/kWh.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":538,"journal":{"name":"Energy Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://energyinformatics.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s42162-023-00288-x","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s42162-023-00288-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Energy","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bidirectional charging allows energy from the electric vehicles (EV) to be fed back into the grid, offering the possibility of price-optimized charging. However, such strategies cause higher charging cycles, which affect the cyclic aging of the battery and reduce its service life, resulting in additional costs for the user. Various approaches are used to account for battery degradation in optimizations models of bidirectional charging use-cases. In this paper, a systematic literature review is carried out to identify existing battery degradation models and to determine the most suitable one. In the models under review, degradation is integrated into the optimization’s objective function. The review shows that there are mainly two strategies suitable for vehicle-to-grid (V2G) optimization problems: A weighted Ah-throughput model (wAh-model) with a constant degradation cost factor and a performance based model (pb-model) linking the degradation to measurable parameters such as capacity loss. Both models were implemented and analyzed. The results show that the wAh-model is the better optimization option, as in the pb-model the current state of health of the battery has an excessively large impact on the calculated degradation cost. It leads to excess costs due to a higher aging rate at the beginning of life which proves to be not ideal in the optimization. The sensitivity analysis reveals that altering the initial State of Health (SoH) from 95 % in the base scenario to 100 % leads to an increase in average degradation costs by factor 9.71 in the pb-model. From the evaluated base scenario the average degradation costs for the pb-model are 0.45 cent/kWh and for the wAh-model 0.23 cent/kWh.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估车辆与电网优化模型中电池退化的结合
双向充电允许电动汽车(EV)的能量反馈到电网,从而提供了价格优化充电的可能性。然而,这种策略会导致更高的充电周期,这会影响电池的循环老化并降低其使用寿命,从而给用户带来额外的成本。在双向充电用例的优化模型中,使用各种方法来解释电池退化。本文对现有的电池退化模型进行了系统的文献综述,以确定最合适的模型。在所审查的模型中,退化被整合到优化的目标函数中。综述表明,主要有两种策略适用于车辆到电网(V2G)优化问题:具有恒定退化成本因子的加权Ah吞吐量模型(wAh模型)和将退化与容量损失等可测量参数联系起来的基于性能的模型(pb模型)。对这两个模型进行了实施和分析。结果表明,wAh模型是更好的优化选择,因为在pb模型中,电池的当前健康状态对计算的退化成本有过大的影响。由于寿命开始时老化率较高,导致成本过高,这在优化中被证明是不理想的。敏感性分析表明,将初始健康状态(SoH)从基本情景中的95%更改为100%,会导致铅模型中的平均降解成本增加9.71倍。根据评估的基本情景,pb模型的平均退化成本为0.45美分/千瓦时,wAh模型的平均降解成本为0.23美分/千瓦小时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Informatics
Energy Informatics Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Electric vehicles, the future of transportation powered by machine learning: a brief review Optimization strategy of property energy management based on artificial intelligence Building energy consumption analysis and measures: a case study from an administration building in Chengdu, China The application of deep learning technology in integrated circuit design Simulation modeling for energy systems analysis: a critical review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1