Barriers to Repair in Maxillofacial Trauma.

J. Radabaugh, Paul Zhang, Duane Wang, Philip L. Y. Lin, Jared M. Shelton, J. Liau, L. Cunningham, T. Gal
{"title":"Barriers to Repair in Maxillofacial Trauma.","authors":"J. Radabaugh, Paul Zhang, Duane Wang, Philip L. Y. Lin, Jared M. Shelton, J. Liau, L. Cunningham, T. Gal","doi":"10.1001/jamafacial.2015.2101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IMPORTANCE\nMultiple factors can be associated with the delayed repair of maxillofacial injuries that may be associated with increased morbidity.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nTo assess factors affecting timing of repair and barriers which may exist in the management of maxillofacial trauma.\n\n\nDESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS\nThis retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care facility used the Current Procedural Terminology coding to identify adult patients undergoing operative repair of maxillofacial injuries between January 2010 and December 2013. Demographic information, presence and severity of concomitant injuries, as well as fracture-specific data including fracture type(s), mechanism of injury, and documented complications were recorded. Identifiable delays for medical, logistical, or other reasons were also documented. Multivariate regression modeling was used to determine factors associated with increased time to repair. A comparative analysis was used to identify association between complications and time to operative repair.\n\n\nMAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES\nTime to operative repair from date of presentation; association of known operative delay and perioperative complications.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOverall, 780 patients were included in the study. Of patients meeting inclusion criteria, mean (SD) age was 36.7 (14.2) years (range, 18-88 years), and 616 patients (79%) were male. Average time to repair was 6.5 days (range, 0-43 days), and 138 patients (17.7%) were observed to have a documented reason for delay for medical reasons (n = 62 [44.9%]), operating room logistical factors (n = 17 [12.3%]), or other reasons (n = 59 patients [42.8%]) either as a function of delayed patient presentation or failure of patients to make scheduled appointments or operations. Injury severity score (ρ = 0.45; P < .001), concurrent injuries (P < .001), decreased Glasgow Coma Scale (P < .001) and inpatient status at time of surgery (P < .001), were associated with increased time to repair. The observed complication rate was 13.6%. There was no statistically significant association between known operative delay and development of complications (χ21 = 2.92; P = .08).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE\nManagement of maxillofacial trauma appears to occur in a timely manner. Patient injury severity appears to have the greatest effect on timing of repair. While delays in operative repair may be unavoidable in certain circumstances, streamlining and managing causes of known delay may help improve and expedite patient care.\n\n\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\n3.","PeriodicalId":14538,"journal":{"name":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","volume":"30 1","pages":"177-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/jamafacial.2015.2101","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2015.2101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Multiple factors can be associated with the delayed repair of maxillofacial injuries that may be associated with increased morbidity. OBJECTIVE To assess factors affecting timing of repair and barriers which may exist in the management of maxillofacial trauma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care facility used the Current Procedural Terminology coding to identify adult patients undergoing operative repair of maxillofacial injuries between January 2010 and December 2013. Demographic information, presence and severity of concomitant injuries, as well as fracture-specific data including fracture type(s), mechanism of injury, and documented complications were recorded. Identifiable delays for medical, logistical, or other reasons were also documented. Multivariate regression modeling was used to determine factors associated with increased time to repair. A comparative analysis was used to identify association between complications and time to operative repair. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Time to operative repair from date of presentation; association of known operative delay and perioperative complications. RESULTS Overall, 780 patients were included in the study. Of patients meeting inclusion criteria, mean (SD) age was 36.7 (14.2) years (range, 18-88 years), and 616 patients (79%) were male. Average time to repair was 6.5 days (range, 0-43 days), and 138 patients (17.7%) were observed to have a documented reason for delay for medical reasons (n = 62 [44.9%]), operating room logistical factors (n = 17 [12.3%]), or other reasons (n = 59 patients [42.8%]) either as a function of delayed patient presentation or failure of patients to make scheduled appointments or operations. Injury severity score (ρ = 0.45; P < .001), concurrent injuries (P < .001), decreased Glasgow Coma Scale (P < .001) and inpatient status at time of surgery (P < .001), were associated with increased time to repair. The observed complication rate was 13.6%. There was no statistically significant association between known operative delay and development of complications (χ21 = 2.92; P = .08). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Management of maxillofacial trauma appears to occur in a timely manner. Patient injury severity appears to have the greatest effect on timing of repair. While delays in operative repair may be unavoidable in certain circumstances, streamlining and managing causes of known delay may help improve and expedite patient care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颌面外伤修复的障碍。
颌面部损伤的延迟修复可能与多种因素有关,这可能与发病率增加有关。目的探讨影响颌面部创伤修复时机的因素及治疗中可能存在的障碍。设计、环境和参与者:本回顾性队列研究在一家三级医疗机构进行,使用现行程序术语编码来识别2010年1月至2013年12月期间接受颌面损伤手术修复的成年患者。记录了人口统计学信息、伴随损伤的存在和严重程度,以及骨折特异性数据,包括骨折类型、损伤机制和记录在案的并发症。还记录了因医疗、后勤或其他原因造成的明显延误。使用多元回归模型来确定与修复时间增加相关的因素。比较分析用于确定并发症与手术修复时间之间的关系。主要结果和措施自就诊之日起至手术修复所需时间;已知手术延迟与围手术期并发症的关系。结果共纳入780例患者。在符合纳入标准的患者中,平均(SD)年龄为36.7(14.2)岁(范围18-88岁),616例(79%)为男性。平均修复时间为6.5天(范围,0-43天),138例(17.7%)患者被观察到有记录的延迟原因:医疗原因(n = 62[44.9%]),手术室后勤因素(n = 17[12.3%]),或其他原因(n = 59例[42.8%]),要么是患者延迟就诊,要么是患者未能按时预约或手术。损伤严重程度评分(ρ = 0.45;P < .001)、并发损伤(P < .001)、格拉斯哥昏迷评分降低(P < .001)和手术时住院状态(P < .001)与修复时间增加相关。并发症发生率为13.6%。已知手术延迟与并发症发生无统计学意义(χ21 = 2.92;p = .08)。结论及相关性颌面部外伤的处理应及时进行。患者损伤的严重程度似乎对修复时间有最大的影响。虽然手术修复的延迟在某些情况下可能是不可避免的,但简化和管理已知延迟的原因可能有助于改善和加快患者护理。证据水平3。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine (Formerly, JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery) is a multispecialty journal with a key mission to provide physicians and providers with the most accurate and innovative information in the discipline of facial plastic (reconstructive and cosmetic) interventions.
期刊最新文献
JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery. Clarification of a Suspension Technique for Unstable Nasal Bones. Masseteric-to-Facial Nerve Transfer and Selective Neurectomy for Rehabilitation of the Synkinetic Smile. A Practical Precaution Relevant to Facial Injections. Effect of a Vibratory Anesthetic Device on Pain Anticipation and Subsequent Pain Perception Among Patients Undergoing Cutaneous Cancer Removal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1