Regorafenib or Cabozantinib in second or subsequent lines after Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Which way to chose?

J. Giuliani, F. Fiorica, A. Bonetti
{"title":"Regorafenib or Cabozantinib in second or subsequent lines after Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Which way to chose?","authors":"J. Giuliani, F. Fiorica, A. Bonetti","doi":"10.15761/ICST.1000344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to assess the cost-effectivess of regorafenib and cabozantib in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after sorafenib. Pivotal phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were considered. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated for both treatments. Two phase III RCTs, including 1274 patients, were considered. Regorafenib resulted the less expensive, with 2771 € per month overall survival (OS)-gained versus 5309 € of cabozantinib. Combining pharmacological costs of drugs with the measure of efficacy represented by the OS, regorafenib is a cost-effective for the treatment of advanced HCC after sorafenib.","PeriodicalId":90850,"journal":{"name":"Integrative cancer science and therapeutics","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative cancer science and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15761/ICST.1000344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to assess the cost-effectivess of regorafenib and cabozantib in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after sorafenib. Pivotal phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were considered. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated for both treatments. Two phase III RCTs, including 1274 patients, were considered. Regorafenib resulted the less expensive, with 2771 € per month overall survival (OS)-gained versus 5309 € of cabozantinib. Combining pharmacological costs of drugs with the measure of efficacy represented by the OS, regorafenib is a cost-effective for the treatment of advanced HCC after sorafenib.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瑞非尼或卡博赞替尼在索拉非尼之后用于治疗晚期肝细胞癌的二线或后续治疗。选择哪条路?
本文的目的是评估瑞非尼和卡博赞布在索拉非尼治疗晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)后的成本-效果。考虑了关键III期随机对照试验(rct)。计算两种治疗的增量成本-效果比(ICER)。纳入了两项III期随机对照试验,包括1274例患者。Regorafenib更便宜,每月总生存期(OS)为2771欧元,而卡博赞替尼为5309欧元。结合药物的药理学成本和以OS为代表的疗效衡量,瑞非尼是继索拉非尼之后治疗晚期HCC的一种具有成本效益的药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
APE1/Ref-1 with reducing activity induces mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition in TNF-α-stimulated breast cancer cells Exploiting mechanism-informed phenotypic screening for development of next-generation antimitotic phytochemicals Prospects for colorectal cancer prevention targeting intestinal microbiome Sclerosing Pneumocytoma: A Carcinoma Mimicker Phytotherapy and oncology. A short review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1