Transformation of the Image-Concept of Russia in British Political Media Discourse: A Diachronic Aspect

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Imagologiya i Komparativistika-Imagology and Comparative Studies Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.17223/24099554/16/10
N. B. Boeva-Omelechko, Ksenia Posternyak
{"title":"Transformation of the Image-Concept of Russia in British Political Media Discourse: A Diachronic Aspect","authors":"N. B. Boeva-Omelechko, Ksenia Posternyak","doi":"10.17223/24099554/16/10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The images of states as special mental models are created in mass media discourse with its powerful persuasive capacity. The image of one and the same state can be different. This article focuses on the mechanisms of such a change of the image of New Russia in British mass media discourse on the basis of a comparative analysis of the linguistic ways of surfacing the nucleus of the concept “Russia” and its three basic layers - metaphorical, evaluative, and etnocultural associative - in the period after the collapse of the Soviet Union (1991-1993) and in the modern one (2013-2018). The relevance of this work is due to the growing interest of the British media in our country and the need to study the dynamics of verbalization of the conceptual, figurative, evaluative and associative components of the concept “Russia” in British media discourse over the past 30 years. The results of the study confirmed our hypothesis that two different images of New Russia were created in British political media discourse in the two periods: one in 1991-1993 after the collapse of the Soviet Union and the other in 2013-2018 when British-Russian relations sharply escalated. In 1991, British journalists still used phrases such as former Soviet Union, Russian-Soviet state, Russian Empire to designate our state. Currently, there are such nominations as the Russian State, the Kremlin, Putin’s Russia. The metaphorical image of Russia has changed from a connotation associated with the concept of a weak, sick, newborn or defeated country to an offensive image of an enemy, a puppeteer, an active participant in military games, or aggressive animals, such as a bear, gorilla or octopus. The evaluative layer of the image-concept of Russia in the 1990s was represented by epithet utterances with some positive connotations associated with the hope of restoration and friendliness on her part. Currently, almost no positive connotations are found. The associative layer of the image-concept of Russia in the 1990s was represented in the British press by former superpower tokens opposing weak Russia to the powerful Soviet Union. Russia, as the successor to the USSR, was associated with the empire, with the green color of rebirth, with the East and mystery. However, objective journalists are sure that Russia is not an enemy, that cooperation between the two countries is mutually beneficial, given the positive historical experience of the interaction of the two great cultures. The analysis scheme proposed in the article can be used to study the transformation of images of other states. The article can be used in training courses for linguists, journalists and politicians.","PeriodicalId":55932,"journal":{"name":"Imagologiya i Komparativistika-Imagology and Comparative Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imagologiya i Komparativistika-Imagology and Comparative Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/24099554/16/10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The images of states as special mental models are created in mass media discourse with its powerful persuasive capacity. The image of one and the same state can be different. This article focuses on the mechanisms of such a change of the image of New Russia in British mass media discourse on the basis of a comparative analysis of the linguistic ways of surfacing the nucleus of the concept “Russia” and its three basic layers - metaphorical, evaluative, and etnocultural associative - in the period after the collapse of the Soviet Union (1991-1993) and in the modern one (2013-2018). The relevance of this work is due to the growing interest of the British media in our country and the need to study the dynamics of verbalization of the conceptual, figurative, evaluative and associative components of the concept “Russia” in British media discourse over the past 30 years. The results of the study confirmed our hypothesis that two different images of New Russia were created in British political media discourse in the two periods: one in 1991-1993 after the collapse of the Soviet Union and the other in 2013-2018 when British-Russian relations sharply escalated. In 1991, British journalists still used phrases such as former Soviet Union, Russian-Soviet state, Russian Empire to designate our state. Currently, there are such nominations as the Russian State, the Kremlin, Putin’s Russia. The metaphorical image of Russia has changed from a connotation associated with the concept of a weak, sick, newborn or defeated country to an offensive image of an enemy, a puppeteer, an active participant in military games, or aggressive animals, such as a bear, gorilla or octopus. The evaluative layer of the image-concept of Russia in the 1990s was represented by epithet utterances with some positive connotations associated with the hope of restoration and friendliness on her part. Currently, almost no positive connotations are found. The associative layer of the image-concept of Russia in the 1990s was represented in the British press by former superpower tokens opposing weak Russia to the powerful Soviet Union. Russia, as the successor to the USSR, was associated with the empire, with the green color of rebirth, with the East and mystery. However, objective journalists are sure that Russia is not an enemy, that cooperation between the two countries is mutually beneficial, given the positive historical experience of the interaction of the two great cultures. The analysis scheme proposed in the article can be used to study the transformation of images of other states. The article can be used in training courses for linguists, journalists and politicians.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国政治媒体话语中俄罗斯形象概念的转变:历时性视角
国家形象作为一种特殊的心理模式,在大众传媒话语中被塑造出来,具有强大的说服力。同一状态的图像可以是不同的。本文通过对比分析前苏联解体后(1991-1993年)和现代(2013-2018年)对“俄罗斯”概念核心及其三个基本层面——隐喻性、评价性和民族文化联想性——的语言表达方式,重点探讨新俄罗斯形象在英国大众传媒话语中的这种变化机制。这项工作的相关性是由于英国媒体对我国的兴趣日益浓厚,并且需要研究过去30年来英国媒体话语中“俄罗斯”概念的概念性,具象性,评价性和联想性成分的语言化动态。研究结果证实了我们的假设,即英国政治媒体话语在两个时期塑造了两种不同的新俄罗斯形象:一种是在苏联解体后的1991-1993年,另一种是在英俄关系急剧升级的2013-2018年。1991年,英国记者还用“前苏联”、“俄苏国家”、“俄罗斯帝国”来称呼我们的国家。目前,有这样的提名,俄罗斯国家,克里姆林宫,普京的俄罗斯。俄罗斯的隐喻形象已经从一个虚弱、生病、新生或战败的国家的内涵转变为敌人、木偶操纵者、军事游戏的积极参与者或攻击性动物(如熊、大猩猩或章鱼)的攻击性形象。20世纪90年代俄罗斯形象概念的评价层主要表现为带有一定积极含义的修辞性话语,这些话语与俄罗斯希望恢复和友好有关。目前,几乎没有发现正面含义。20世纪90年代,俄罗斯形象概念的联想层在英国媒体上表现为前超级大国的象征,反对软弱的俄罗斯,反对强大的苏联。俄罗斯,作为苏联的继承者,与帝国,与重生的绿色,与东方和神秘联系在一起。然而,客观的记者确信,俄罗斯不是敌人,鉴于两国文化互动的积极历史经验,两国之间的合作是互利的。本文提出的分析方案可用于研究其他状态图像的变换。这篇文章可用于语言学家、记者和政治家的培训课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ivan Bunin’s Middle East and Nikolay Gumilyov’s Africa: Travels Through the “Map” of Literary Techniques Motherland in the Philosophy of Eurasianism The Poetics of the Carnation: The Word and the Image in Russian Poetry From Trediakovsky to Brodsky (In the Context of European Tradition). Part One Altai Hydropoetics: Rivers Sleep of Reason: Existential Motifs in Vasily Shukshin’s Story “Thoughts”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1