The Neoimperial Motif in Russian Historical Movies of the 2000s-2010s and the Phenomenon of Orthodox Cinematographic Sermon

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Imagologiya i Komparativistika-Imagology and Comparative Studies Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.17223/24099554/16/16
K. Sharov
{"title":"The Neoimperial Motif in Russian Historical Movies of the 2000s-2010s and the Phenomenon of Orthodox Cinematographic Sermon","authors":"K. Sharov","doi":"10.17223/24099554/16/16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the last two decades, the topic of imperial consciousness and the ideological construction of a neo-imperial approach to contemporary Russian history within the narrative of post-Soviet “neo-imperialism” has been increasingly revived in Russian cinema. It has not much about developing the idea of Great Russia with a highest world mission. There are hardly more Slavophile motives here than Westernisers’ ones. The new historical movies shot mainly by the Russian state or Church request construct a parable about a great supranational historical empire, which unites all ethnic groups, peoples, and religions under the rule of the Russian Tsar / Emperor / Patriarch. For Soviet times, the Communist Party or its leader usually plays the role of the monarch, while the role of civil religion can be played by political ideology. The modern Patriarchate of the Russian Orthodox Church disseminates the idea of imperialism as a basis of the Orthodox media cinematographic preaching. This type of preaching, along with Christian preaching on the Internet, social networks, and video games, has become increasingly used by Orthodox clergymen and church organisations. Here Russian Orthodox Church follows the Roman Catholics and Protestants, who currently use media sermon as an important part of their homiletics. From priests to clergy of the highest rank, such as Metropolitan Hilarion (Alfeev) of Volokolamsk or Metropolitan Tikhon (Shevkunov) of Pskov and Porkhovsk, more and more men of cloth begin to attract audience by their performance in offline and online video blogs, by online streams of their sermons in the digital space and finally, by shooting films, both documentaries and feature films. The main components of the neo-imperial narrative in the modern ideologised cinematographic preaching are the following: 1) constructing the parable of the great supranational historical empire (pre-Mongol Rus, Horde, Russian Principality, Russian Tsardom, Russian Empire, finally, the Soviet Union); 2) emphasising the great role of political leader, prince / tsar / emperor / general secretary / president; 3) resorting to preposterous synthesis of incompatible ideals of the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union; 4) spreading anti-historicism, anachronism, including linguistic, substituting historical fantasy for the history of the Russian Orthodox Church; 5) elevating the current national ideology to the status of national archetype, with searching and successful finding of “eternal” geopolitical enemies and friends of Russia; 6) re-considering Orthodoxy as a glamour “export product” for the West. The Cinematographic Orthodoxy depicted in imperial propaganda films has little in common with the history of the Russian Orthodox Church and the ideal of Orthodox Christian morality. Under the pen of scriptwriters and film directors who create their mass products by the order of the current Russian state or Patriarchate, Orthodox Christianity becomes a social and media construct that must exists solely for the blessing and support of the state power, as well as for the entertainment of the mass audience. Therefore, we must stress that such a preaching does not achieve its goals, as it does not preach Jesus Christ’s teaching, spirituality and a way for soul salvation and improvement.","PeriodicalId":55932,"journal":{"name":"Imagologiya i Komparativistika-Imagology and Comparative Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imagologiya i Komparativistika-Imagology and Comparative Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/24099554/16/16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the last two decades, the topic of imperial consciousness and the ideological construction of a neo-imperial approach to contemporary Russian history within the narrative of post-Soviet “neo-imperialism” has been increasingly revived in Russian cinema. It has not much about developing the idea of Great Russia with a highest world mission. There are hardly more Slavophile motives here than Westernisers’ ones. The new historical movies shot mainly by the Russian state or Church request construct a parable about a great supranational historical empire, which unites all ethnic groups, peoples, and religions under the rule of the Russian Tsar / Emperor / Patriarch. For Soviet times, the Communist Party or its leader usually plays the role of the monarch, while the role of civil religion can be played by political ideology. The modern Patriarchate of the Russian Orthodox Church disseminates the idea of imperialism as a basis of the Orthodox media cinematographic preaching. This type of preaching, along with Christian preaching on the Internet, social networks, and video games, has become increasingly used by Orthodox clergymen and church organisations. Here Russian Orthodox Church follows the Roman Catholics and Protestants, who currently use media sermon as an important part of their homiletics. From priests to clergy of the highest rank, such as Metropolitan Hilarion (Alfeev) of Volokolamsk or Metropolitan Tikhon (Shevkunov) of Pskov and Porkhovsk, more and more men of cloth begin to attract audience by their performance in offline and online video blogs, by online streams of their sermons in the digital space and finally, by shooting films, both documentaries and feature films. The main components of the neo-imperial narrative in the modern ideologised cinematographic preaching are the following: 1) constructing the parable of the great supranational historical empire (pre-Mongol Rus, Horde, Russian Principality, Russian Tsardom, Russian Empire, finally, the Soviet Union); 2) emphasising the great role of political leader, prince / tsar / emperor / general secretary / president; 3) resorting to preposterous synthesis of incompatible ideals of the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union; 4) spreading anti-historicism, anachronism, including linguistic, substituting historical fantasy for the history of the Russian Orthodox Church; 5) elevating the current national ideology to the status of national archetype, with searching and successful finding of “eternal” geopolitical enemies and friends of Russia; 6) re-considering Orthodoxy as a glamour “export product” for the West. The Cinematographic Orthodoxy depicted in imperial propaganda films has little in common with the history of the Russian Orthodox Church and the ideal of Orthodox Christian morality. Under the pen of scriptwriters and film directors who create their mass products by the order of the current Russian state or Patriarchate, Orthodox Christianity becomes a social and media construct that must exists solely for the blessing and support of the state power, as well as for the entertainment of the mass audience. Therefore, we must stress that such a preaching does not achieve its goals, as it does not preach Jesus Christ’s teaching, spirituality and a way for soul salvation and improvement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2000 -2010年代俄罗斯历史电影中的新帝国母题与正统电影布道现象
在过去的二十年中,帝国意识的话题和在后苏联“新帝国主义”叙事中对当代俄罗斯历史的新帝国主义方法的意识形态建构,在俄罗斯电影中日益复苏。它没有太多关于发展具有最高世界使命的大俄罗斯的想法。这里几乎没有比西方人更多的亲斯拉夫动机。主要由俄罗斯国家或教会拍摄的新历史电影要求构建一个关于一个伟大的超国家历史帝国的寓言,这个帝国在俄罗斯沙皇/皇帝/宗主教的统治下团结了所有的民族、民族和宗教。在苏联时代,共产党或其领导人通常扮演君主的角色,而公民宗教的角色则可以由政治意识形态来扮演。俄罗斯东正教的现代宗主教区传播帝国主义的思想,作为东正教媒体电影说教的基础。这种类型的讲道,以及基督教在互联网、社交网络和视频游戏上的讲道,越来越多地被东正教牧师和教会组织使用。在这里,俄罗斯东正教追随罗马天主教徒和新教徒,他们目前使用媒体布道作为他们讲道的重要组成部分。从牧师到最高级别的神职人员,如Volokolamsk的Metropolitan Hilarion (Alfeev)或Pskov和Porkhovsk的Metropolitan Tikhon (Shevkunov),越来越多的神职人员开始通过他们在线下和在线视频博客上的表演,通过数字空间的在线布道流,最后,通过拍摄纪录片和剧情片来吸引观众。在现代意识形态化的电影说教中,新帝国叙事的主要组成部分如下:1)构建伟大的超国家历史帝国的寓言(前蒙古罗斯、部落、俄罗斯公国、俄罗斯沙皇、俄罗斯帝国,最后是苏联);2)强调政治领袖、亲王/沙皇/皇帝/总书记/总统的伟大作用;3)将俄罗斯帝国和苏联不相容的理想荒谬地综合在一起;4)传播反历史主义,时代错误,包括语言学,用历史幻想代替俄罗斯东正教会的历史;5)将当前的国家意识形态提升到国家原型的地位,寻找并成功地找到俄罗斯“永恒的”地缘政治敌人和朋友;6)重新考虑将东正教作为西方的魅力“出口产品”。帝国宣传电影中描绘的电影正教与俄罗斯东正教会的历史和东正教道德的理想几乎没有共同之处。在编剧和电影导演的笔下,他们按照当前俄罗斯国家或宗主教区的命令创作大众产品,东正教成为一种社会和媒体结构,它的存在必须仅仅是为了祝福和支持国家权力,以及为了大众观众的娱乐。因此,我们必须强调,这样的讲道并没有达到它的目的,因为它没有传讲耶稣基督的教导,灵性和灵魂救赎和改善的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ivan Bunin’s Middle East and Nikolay Gumilyov’s Africa: Travels Through the “Map” of Literary Techniques Motherland in the Philosophy of Eurasianism The Poetics of the Carnation: The Word and the Image in Russian Poetry From Trediakovsky to Brodsky (In the Context of European Tradition). Part One Altai Hydropoetics: Rivers Sleep of Reason: Existential Motifs in Vasily Shukshin’s Story “Thoughts”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1