Walter Scott’s Saint Ronan’s Well in Ivan Turgenev’s Artistic Perception

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Imagologiya i Komparativistika-Imagology and Comparative Studies Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.17223/24099554/16/4
Ivan O. Volkov
{"title":"Walter Scott’s Saint Ronan’s Well in Ivan Turgenev’s Artistic Perception","authors":"Ivan O. Volkov","doi":"10.17223/24099554/16/4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article brings forth and develops the problem of I.S. Turgenev’s consequent perception of W. Scott’s SaintRonan’s Well (1824). The author focuses, firstly, on the I.S. Turgenev’s notes on the pages of the English novel and, secondly, on the analysis of Turgenev’s Clara Militch (1883), whose artistic composition reflects Walter Scott’s motifs and images. Saint Ronan’s Well was in the area of Turgenev’s reader interest in the early 1840-s. While reading the novel, he left notes in the form of short lines on the margins and underlined separate words, using either a pencil or his nail. On the one hand, Turgenev’s notes demonstrate his reader interest to the ironic impression of the entire Saint Ronan’s Well society and its individual representatives (for example, the images of Mac Turk, Mister Winterblossom, Earl Etherington). On the other hand, Turgenev emphasizes four leading and minor characters. Paired by Turgenev, they have an antithetic mode: the comic images of Peregrine Touchwood and Meg Dods and dramatic images of Lord Etherington and John Mowbray. Turgenev is sensitive to W. Scott’s principle of depiction, based on the deep and acute contradiction between individual characters and within their feeling worlds.","PeriodicalId":55932,"journal":{"name":"Imagologiya i Komparativistika-Imagology and Comparative Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imagologiya i Komparativistika-Imagology and Comparative Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/24099554/16/4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article brings forth and develops the problem of I.S. Turgenev’s consequent perception of W. Scott’s SaintRonan’s Well (1824). The author focuses, firstly, on the I.S. Turgenev’s notes on the pages of the English novel and, secondly, on the analysis of Turgenev’s Clara Militch (1883), whose artistic composition reflects Walter Scott’s motifs and images. Saint Ronan’s Well was in the area of Turgenev’s reader interest in the early 1840-s. While reading the novel, he left notes in the form of short lines on the margins and underlined separate words, using either a pencil or his nail. On the one hand, Turgenev’s notes demonstrate his reader interest to the ironic impression of the entire Saint Ronan’s Well society and its individual representatives (for example, the images of Mac Turk, Mister Winterblossom, Earl Etherington). On the other hand, Turgenev emphasizes four leading and minor characters. Paired by Turgenev, they have an antithetic mode: the comic images of Peregrine Touchwood and Meg Dods and dramatic images of Lord Etherington and John Mowbray. Turgenev is sensitive to W. Scott’s principle of depiction, based on the deep and acute contradiction between individual characters and within their feeling worlds.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
屠格涅夫艺术观感中的圣罗南井
本文提出并发展了屠格涅夫对斯科特的《圣特罗南井》(1824)的后续认知问题。本文首先分析了屠格涅夫对这部英国小说的注解,然后分析了屠格涅夫的《克拉拉·米奇》(1883),这部小说的艺术构图反映了沃尔特·司各特的母题和意象。圣罗南井在19世纪40年代早期是屠格涅夫读者感兴趣的地方。在阅读这本小说时,他在页边空白处以短线的形式留下笔记,并用铅笔或指甲在单独的单词下划线。一方面,屠格涅夫的笔记显示了他的读者对整个圣罗南井社会及其个人代表的讽刺印象的兴趣(例如,麦克·特克,冬花先生,厄尔·埃瑟林顿的形象)。另一方面,屠格涅夫强调四个主要和次要人物。在屠格涅夫的配合下,他们形成了一种对立的模式:佩格林·塔奇伍德和梅格·多兹的喜剧形象和埃瑟林顿勋爵和约翰·莫布雷的戏剧形象。屠格涅夫对斯科特的描写原则很敏感,这种原则是基于人物之间和他们的情感世界之间深刻而尖锐的矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ivan Bunin’s Middle East and Nikolay Gumilyov’s Africa: Travels Through the “Map” of Literary Techniques Motherland in the Philosophy of Eurasianism The Poetics of the Carnation: The Word and the Image in Russian Poetry From Trediakovsky to Brodsky (In the Context of European Tradition). Part One Altai Hydropoetics: Rivers Sleep of Reason: Existential Motifs in Vasily Shukshin’s Story “Thoughts”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1