NOT FOR WOMEN OR WORK ON AN EQUAL FOOTING? GEOLOGISTS’ NARRATIVES ABOUT FIELD WORKS

Q2 Arts and Humanities Ural''skij Istoriceskij Vestnik Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.30759/1728-9718-2023-1(78)-133-141
V. Kliueva
{"title":"NOT FOR WOMEN OR WORK ON AN EQUAL FOOTING? GEOLOGISTS’ NARRATIVES ABOUT FIELD WORKS","authors":"V. Kliueva","doi":"10.30759/1728-9718-2023-1(78)-133-141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the gender aspect of geologists’ field work. The question is raised about cases of management of gender in geological professions. The emphasis on field specifics is made because the work of geologists in society is associated with uncomfortable working conditions. The appeal to the difficulties of fieldwork is an argument for characterizing the profession of a geologist as not suitable for women. Probably, for geologists, going to the field was a way to satisfy the need for extreme emotions. Field experience is perceived as an opportunity to test oneself in difficult conditions. Analysis of the collected narratives shows that gender was secondary in the field. The primary role was played by the professional skills of a field geologist. Although there were cases of sexism. The aspects of organizing field work are discussed in detail: distribution of duties and selection of expedition members; living conditions; informal practices of free time. The main method of data collection is a biographical narrative interview. Interviews were conducted with field geologists who worked in the northern regions of the country during the late Soviet period. These narratives were supplemented by published memoirs. The research was conducted in 2014–2021.","PeriodicalId":37813,"journal":{"name":"Ural''skij Istoriceskij Vestnik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ural''skij Istoriceskij Vestnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30759/1728-9718-2023-1(78)-133-141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article analyzes the gender aspect of geologists’ field work. The question is raised about cases of management of gender in geological professions. The emphasis on field specifics is made because the work of geologists in society is associated with uncomfortable working conditions. The appeal to the difficulties of fieldwork is an argument for characterizing the profession of a geologist as not suitable for women. Probably, for geologists, going to the field was a way to satisfy the need for extreme emotions. Field experience is perceived as an opportunity to test oneself in difficult conditions. Analysis of the collected narratives shows that gender was secondary in the field. The primary role was played by the professional skills of a field geologist. Although there were cases of sexism. The aspects of organizing field work are discussed in detail: distribution of duties and selection of expedition members; living conditions; informal practices of free time. The main method of data collection is a biographical narrative interview. Interviews were conducted with field geologists who worked in the northern regions of the country during the late Soviet period. These narratives were supplemented by published memoirs. The research was conducted in 2014–2021.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对女性不公平,对工作不公平?地质学家关于野外工作的叙述
文章分析了地质工作者野外工作中的性别问题。提出的问题是关于地质专业中性别管理的案例。之所以强调实地特点,是因为地质学家在社会上的工作与不舒服的工作条件有关。对野外工作困难的呼吁是将地质学家这一职业定性为不适合女性的论据。也许,对地质学家来说,去野外是一种满足极端情感需求的方式。实地经验被认为是在困难条件下检验自己的机会。对收集到的叙述的分析表明,性别在现场是次要的。野外地质学家的专业技能发挥了主要作用。尽管也有性别歧视的案例。详细论述了组织野外考察工作的几个方面:职责的分配和考察队员的选拔;生活条件;业余时间的非正式活动。数据收集的主要方法是传记式叙事性访谈。采访了在苏联后期在该国北部地区工作的实地地质学家。出版的回忆录补充了这些叙述。该研究于2014年至2021年进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ural''skij Istoriceskij Vestnik
Ural''skij Istoriceskij Vestnik Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The Institute of History and Archaeology of the Ural Branch of RAS introduces the “Ural Historical Journal” — a quarterly magazine. Every issue contains publications on the central conceptual topic (e.g. “literary tradition”, “phenomenon of colonization”, “concept of Eurasianism”), a specific historical or regional topic, a discussion forum, information about academic publications, conferences and field research, jubilees and other important events in the life of the historians’ guild. All papers to be published in the Journal are subject to expert reviews. The editorial staff of the Journal invites research, members of academic community and educational institutions to cooperation as authors of the articles and information messages, as well as readers and subscribers to the magazine.
期刊最新文献
NOT FOR WOMEN OR WORK ON AN EQUAL FOOTING? GEOLOGISTS’ NARRATIVES ABOUT FIELD WORKS THE “MOSQUITO SHAMAN’S” SONG-SPELL (BLOOD-SUCKING INSECTS IN THE CULTURE OF THE NENETS AND OB UGRIANS) “THE TASTES OF THE ARCTIC”: NEW GASTRONOMIC TRENDS IN CHUKOTKA, TAIMYR AND KOLA POLAR REGION SUBJECTIVITY OF THE KAZAKH NOMADIC CULTURE IN THE 1960S POETRY OF OLZHAS SULEIMENOV HEREDITARY SERVICEMEN IN THE BORDER TOWN ON THE VOLGA AT THE END OF THE TIME OF TROUBLES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1