THE NEOLITHIC–ENEOLITHIC TRANSITION IN THE FOREST-STEPPE AND FOREST MIDDLE VOLGA REGION: FORMS, MODELS AND CHRONOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK

Q2 Arts and Humanities Ural''skij Istoriceskij Vestnik Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.30759/1728-9718-2023-1(78)-15-25
Konstantin Andreev, Aleksandr S. Kudashov, Anatoliy V. Somov, A. Shalapinin
{"title":"THE NEOLITHIC–ENEOLITHIC TRANSITION IN THE FOREST-STEPPE AND FOREST MIDDLE VOLGA REGION: FORMS, MODELS AND CHRONOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK","authors":"Konstantin Andreev, Aleksandr S. Kudashov, Anatoliy V. Somov, A. Shalapinin","doi":"10.30759/1728-9718-2023-1(78)-15-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The transition from the Neolithic to the Eneolithic in the forest-steppe and forest zones of the Middle Volga region is a very complex and multi-vector process. The Samara and Khvalynsk cultures of the forest-steppe Volga region are newcomers and have fundamental differences from the materials of the Srednevolzhskaya Neolithic culture at the early stages of development. The results of radiocarbon dating indicate the time of their coexistence from the beginning to the third quarter of the 5th millennium BC. During the specified period, the indicated groups interact with varying degrees of intensity from the borrowing of individual features to the appearance of syncretic types of dishes (type Lebyazhinka III, the Ivanovo stage of the Samara culture). As a result, these processes lead to the formation of a number of Late Eneolithic cultural types (Chekalinsky and Toksky). In the forest zone of the Middle Volga region, there is a gradual transition from the Neolithic to the Eneolithic. The Neolithic groups of this region (carriers of the Kama comb and Volga-Oka combpit traditions) actively interact with each other, which was reflected in the formation of Krasnyy Most type of ceramics in the last quarter of the 5th millennium BC. In turn, in the first half of the 4th millennium BC, the Krasnyy Most type of ceramics became one of the main components of the Middle Volga variant of the Volosovo Eneolithic culture.","PeriodicalId":37813,"journal":{"name":"Ural''skij Istoriceskij Vestnik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ural''skij Istoriceskij Vestnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30759/1728-9718-2023-1(78)-15-25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The transition from the Neolithic to the Eneolithic in the forest-steppe and forest zones of the Middle Volga region is a very complex and multi-vector process. The Samara and Khvalynsk cultures of the forest-steppe Volga region are newcomers and have fundamental differences from the materials of the Srednevolzhskaya Neolithic culture at the early stages of development. The results of radiocarbon dating indicate the time of their coexistence from the beginning to the third quarter of the 5th millennium BC. During the specified period, the indicated groups interact with varying degrees of intensity from the borrowing of individual features to the appearance of syncretic types of dishes (type Lebyazhinka III, the Ivanovo stage of the Samara culture). As a result, these processes lead to the formation of a number of Late Eneolithic cultural types (Chekalinsky and Toksky). In the forest zone of the Middle Volga region, there is a gradual transition from the Neolithic to the Eneolithic. The Neolithic groups of this region (carriers of the Kama comb and Volga-Oka combpit traditions) actively interact with each other, which was reflected in the formation of Krasnyy Most type of ceramics in the last quarter of the 5th millennium BC. In turn, in the first half of the 4th millennium BC, the Krasnyy Most type of ceramics became one of the main components of the Middle Volga variant of the Volosovo Eneolithic culture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伏尔加河中部森林草原和森林地区新石器时代—新石器时代的过渡:形式、模式和年代框架
中伏尔加河地区森林草原和森林地带新石器时代向新石器时代过渡是一个非常复杂的多向量过程。伏尔加河森林草原地区的萨马拉文化和赫瓦连斯克文化是新来者,在发展的早期阶段与新石器文化的材料有根本的不同。放射性碳定年的结果表明,它们共存的时间是从公元前5千年的开始到第三季度。在指定的时期内,所指出的群体以不同程度的强度相互作用,从借用个人特征到出现融合类型的菜肴(Lebyazhinka III型,萨马拉文化的Ivanovo阶段)。因此,这些过程导致了许多晚新石器时代文化类型的形成(Chekalinsky和Toksky)。在中伏尔加河地区的森林地带,从新石器时代逐渐过渡到新石器时代。该地区的新石器时代群体(Kama comb和Volga-Oka combpit传统的携带者)彼此积极互动,这反映在公元前5千年的最后一个季度Krasnyy Most类型陶瓷的形成上。反过来,在公元前4千年的上半叶,克拉斯尼·Most类型的陶瓷成为伏尔加中部伏尔加变体伏尔加新石器时代文化的主要组成部分之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ural''skij Istoriceskij Vestnik
Ural''skij Istoriceskij Vestnik Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The Institute of History and Archaeology of the Ural Branch of RAS introduces the “Ural Historical Journal” — a quarterly magazine. Every issue contains publications on the central conceptual topic (e.g. “literary tradition”, “phenomenon of colonization”, “concept of Eurasianism”), a specific historical or regional topic, a discussion forum, information about academic publications, conferences and field research, jubilees and other important events in the life of the historians’ guild. All papers to be published in the Journal are subject to expert reviews. The editorial staff of the Journal invites research, members of academic community and educational institutions to cooperation as authors of the articles and information messages, as well as readers and subscribers to the magazine.
期刊最新文献
NOT FOR WOMEN OR WORK ON AN EQUAL FOOTING? GEOLOGISTS’ NARRATIVES ABOUT FIELD WORKS THE “MOSQUITO SHAMAN’S” SONG-SPELL (BLOOD-SUCKING INSECTS IN THE CULTURE OF THE NENETS AND OB UGRIANS) “THE TASTES OF THE ARCTIC”: NEW GASTRONOMIC TRENDS IN CHUKOTKA, TAIMYR AND KOLA POLAR REGION SUBJECTIVITY OF THE KAZAKH NOMADIC CULTURE IN THE 1960S POETRY OF OLZHAS SULEIMENOV HEREDITARY SERVICEMEN IN THE BORDER TOWN ON THE VOLGA AT THE END OF THE TIME OF TROUBLES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1