Konstantin Andreev, Aleksandr S. Kudashov, Anatoliy V. Somov, A. Shalapinin
{"title":"THE NEOLITHIC–ENEOLITHIC TRANSITION IN THE FOREST-STEPPE AND FOREST MIDDLE VOLGA REGION: FORMS, MODELS AND CHRONOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK","authors":"Konstantin Andreev, Aleksandr S. Kudashov, Anatoliy V. Somov, A. Shalapinin","doi":"10.30759/1728-9718-2023-1(78)-15-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The transition from the Neolithic to the Eneolithic in the forest-steppe and forest zones of the Middle Volga region is a very complex and multi-vector process. The Samara and Khvalynsk cultures of the forest-steppe Volga region are newcomers and have fundamental differences from the materials of the Srednevolzhskaya Neolithic culture at the early stages of development. The results of radiocarbon dating indicate the time of their coexistence from the beginning to the third quarter of the 5th millennium BC. During the specified period, the indicated groups interact with varying degrees of intensity from the borrowing of individual features to the appearance of syncretic types of dishes (type Lebyazhinka III, the Ivanovo stage of the Samara culture). As a result, these processes lead to the formation of a number of Late Eneolithic cultural types (Chekalinsky and Toksky). In the forest zone of the Middle Volga region, there is a gradual transition from the Neolithic to the Eneolithic. The Neolithic groups of this region (carriers of the Kama comb and Volga-Oka combpit traditions) actively interact with each other, which was reflected in the formation of Krasnyy Most type of ceramics in the last quarter of the 5th millennium BC. In turn, in the first half of the 4th millennium BC, the Krasnyy Most type of ceramics became one of the main components of the Middle Volga variant of the Volosovo Eneolithic culture.","PeriodicalId":37813,"journal":{"name":"Ural''skij Istoriceskij Vestnik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ural''skij Istoriceskij Vestnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30759/1728-9718-2023-1(78)-15-25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The transition from the Neolithic to the Eneolithic in the forest-steppe and forest zones of the Middle Volga region is a very complex and multi-vector process. The Samara and Khvalynsk cultures of the forest-steppe Volga region are newcomers and have fundamental differences from the materials of the Srednevolzhskaya Neolithic culture at the early stages of development. The results of radiocarbon dating indicate the time of their coexistence from the beginning to the third quarter of the 5th millennium BC. During the specified period, the indicated groups interact with varying degrees of intensity from the borrowing of individual features to the appearance of syncretic types of dishes (type Lebyazhinka III, the Ivanovo stage of the Samara culture). As a result, these processes lead to the formation of a number of Late Eneolithic cultural types (Chekalinsky and Toksky). In the forest zone of the Middle Volga region, there is a gradual transition from the Neolithic to the Eneolithic. The Neolithic groups of this region (carriers of the Kama comb and Volga-Oka combpit traditions) actively interact with each other, which was reflected in the formation of Krasnyy Most type of ceramics in the last quarter of the 5th millennium BC. In turn, in the first half of the 4th millennium BC, the Krasnyy Most type of ceramics became one of the main components of the Middle Volga variant of the Volosovo Eneolithic culture.
期刊介绍:
The Institute of History and Archaeology of the Ural Branch of RAS introduces the “Ural Historical Journal” — a quarterly magazine. Every issue contains publications on the central conceptual topic (e.g. “literary tradition”, “phenomenon of colonization”, “concept of Eurasianism”), a specific historical or regional topic, a discussion forum, information about academic publications, conferences and field research, jubilees and other important events in the life of the historians’ guild. All papers to be published in the Journal are subject to expert reviews. The editorial staff of the Journal invites research, members of academic community and educational institutions to cooperation as authors of the articles and information messages, as well as readers and subscribers to the magazine.