Enfoques disciplinarios e interdisciplinarios para el análisis y definición de la violencia

Tania Galaviz Armenta
{"title":"Enfoques disciplinarios e interdisciplinarios para el análisis y definición de la violencia","authors":"Tania Galaviz Armenta","doi":"10.30854/ANF.V28.N50.2021.656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: despite the plentiful academic discussion about violence, forms of violence, actors, effects, among other things, a question emerges almost permanently: what do we talk about when we talk about violence? This article makes a reflection on the definition and analysis of the concept of violence from different disciplinary and interdisciplinary approaches in order to answer the question: what is meant by violence? Methodology: some approaches from Anthropology, Political Science, Philosophy, Sociology, Research for Peace, Criminology and Public Health were considered. Results: it was found that most of the research considers violence as an element that delimits social interactions rather than an irrational or instinctive act. And, these studies establish the degree of cultural, symbolic, institutional influences and the normative in its management and reasoning, depending on the perspective of analysis. Conclusion. a review of advantages and disadvantages of the analytical expediency of the transition from the term violence into the expression of violence was concluded. It considers an interdisciplinary approach that not only focuses on physical manifestations, but addresses the multidimensionality of violence and the matter created by different scales of interaction and affectation by making the violence a changeable and complex social phenomenon.","PeriodicalId":31179,"journal":{"name":"Anfora","volume":"28 1","pages":"161-182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anfora","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30854/ANF.V28.N50.2021.656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: despite the plentiful academic discussion about violence, forms of violence, actors, effects, among other things, a question emerges almost permanently: what do we talk about when we talk about violence? This article makes a reflection on the definition and analysis of the concept of violence from different disciplinary and interdisciplinary approaches in order to answer the question: what is meant by violence? Methodology: some approaches from Anthropology, Political Science, Philosophy, Sociology, Research for Peace, Criminology and Public Health were considered. Results: it was found that most of the research considers violence as an element that delimits social interactions rather than an irrational or instinctive act. And, these studies establish the degree of cultural, symbolic, institutional influences and the normative in its management and reasoning, depending on the perspective of analysis. Conclusion. a review of advantages and disadvantages of the analytical expediency of the transition from the term violence into the expression of violence was concluded. It considers an interdisciplinary approach that not only focuses on physical manifestations, but addresses the multidimensionality of violence and the matter created by different scales of interaction and affectation by making the violence a changeable and complex social phenomenon.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析和定义暴力的学科和跨学科方法
目标:尽管关于暴力、暴力形式、行为者、影响等方面的学术讨论很多,但一个问题几乎永远会出现:当我们谈论暴力时,我们在谈论什么?本文从不同学科和跨学科的角度对暴力概念的定义和分析进行反思,以回答“暴力意味着什么”这个问题。方法:考虑了人类学、政治学、哲学、社会学、和平研究、犯罪学和公共卫生的一些方法。结果:研究发现,大多数研究将暴力视为界定社会互动的一个因素,而不是非理性或本能的行为。并且,这些研究在其管理和推理中建立了文化、象征、制度影响的程度和规范性,这取决于分析的角度。结论。最后,对从暴力一词过渡到暴力的表达的分析权宜之计的利弊进行了审查。它考虑了一种跨学科的方法,不仅关注身体表现,而且通过使暴力成为一种多变而复杂的社会现象,解决了暴力的多维性以及由不同规模的互动和影响所产生的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Individualismo y colectivismo cultural en relación con la desigualdad socioeconómica desde el enfoque de la psicología social evolutiva Prácticas educativas incluyentes y conflicto armado en el oriente antioqueño colombiano Situación de trabajo decente en las ciudades de Bogotá, Medellín y Bucaramanga 2018-2020 Desarrollo social y sostenibilidad. Propuestas para el cambio Educación ambiental y producción agropecuaria sostenible:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1