Hepatoprotective Effects of Mulberries and Cape gooseberry on Thioacetamide Induced Liver Injury in Rats

H. H. A. El-Rahman, Nasra A. Abd-Elhak, N. Zaki
{"title":"Hepatoprotective Effects of Mulberries and Cape gooseberry on Thioacetamide Induced Liver Injury in Rats","authors":"H. H. A. El-Rahman, Nasra A. Abd-Elhak, N. Zaki","doi":"10.12691/AJFN-8-4-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study was to evaluate the hepatoprotective effects of black mulberry, white mulberry and cape gooseberry on the thioacetamide (TAA)-induced rats hepatocytes damage in vivo. The data showed that significant differences in the total phenolics and total flavonoids content, between the black mulberry, white mulberry and cape gooseberry. These findings revealed that black mulberry had more total antioxidant activity. The highest levels of glucose, fructose and arabinose were detected in white mulberry. The 54 male albino rats used separately into nine groups of 6 rats each group for 4 weeks as follows: Group 1 served as a normal control. Groups 2-9: Rats injected with TAA (100 mg/kg, i.p.) twice a week. Group 2 kept as positive control. Groups 3 and 4 were given 5 and 10 ml/kg b.w rat of black mulberry. Group 5 and 6 were administered 5 and 10 ml/kg b.w rat of white mulberry. Groups 7 and 8 received 5 and 10 ml/kg b.w rat of cape gooseberry. Finally, Group 9 was treated daily with silymarin (100 mg/kg). The effects were compared with a known hepatoprotective agent and silymarin. Alteration in the morphological and the levels of biochemical markers of hepatic damage were studied in the groups. TAA has elevated the liver function, kidney function, lipid profile and MDA levels and reduced the serum levels of albumin, HDL cholesterol, and CAT. Treatments with black mulberry, white mulberry and cape gooseberry juices brought back the altered levels of biochemical markers to the near normal levels at doses independently. Histological examination of the liver tissues confirmed the hepatoprotective effect of fruits juices. These results were documented by the amelioration signs in rat’s hepatic architecture. Conclusion: our study demonstrated the ameliorative effects of black mulberry, white mulberry and cape gooseberry juices against TAA induced hepatotoxicity in rats.","PeriodicalId":7859,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Food and Nutrition","volume":"34 1","pages":"101-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Food and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12691/AJFN-8-4-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the hepatoprotective effects of black mulberry, white mulberry and cape gooseberry on the thioacetamide (TAA)-induced rats hepatocytes damage in vivo. The data showed that significant differences in the total phenolics and total flavonoids content, between the black mulberry, white mulberry and cape gooseberry. These findings revealed that black mulberry had more total antioxidant activity. The highest levels of glucose, fructose and arabinose were detected in white mulberry. The 54 male albino rats used separately into nine groups of 6 rats each group for 4 weeks as follows: Group 1 served as a normal control. Groups 2-9: Rats injected with TAA (100 mg/kg, i.p.) twice a week. Group 2 kept as positive control. Groups 3 and 4 were given 5 and 10 ml/kg b.w rat of black mulberry. Group 5 and 6 were administered 5 and 10 ml/kg b.w rat of white mulberry. Groups 7 and 8 received 5 and 10 ml/kg b.w rat of cape gooseberry. Finally, Group 9 was treated daily with silymarin (100 mg/kg). The effects were compared with a known hepatoprotective agent and silymarin. Alteration in the morphological and the levels of biochemical markers of hepatic damage were studied in the groups. TAA has elevated the liver function, kidney function, lipid profile and MDA levels and reduced the serum levels of albumin, HDL cholesterol, and CAT. Treatments with black mulberry, white mulberry and cape gooseberry juices brought back the altered levels of biochemical markers to the near normal levels at doses independently. Histological examination of the liver tissues confirmed the hepatoprotective effect of fruits juices. These results were documented by the amelioration signs in rat’s hepatic architecture. Conclusion: our study demonstrated the ameliorative effects of black mulberry, white mulberry and cape gooseberry juices against TAA induced hepatotoxicity in rats.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
桑葚和醋栗对硫乙酰胺所致大鼠肝损伤的保护作用
本研究旨在探讨黑桑、白桑和醋栗对硫代乙酰胺(TAA)诱导的大鼠肝细胞损伤的保护作用。结果表明,黑桑、白桑和醋栗的总酚类物质和总黄酮含量差异显著。结果表明,黑桑具有较高的总抗氧化活性。白桑树中葡萄糖、果糖和阿拉伯糖的含量最高。将54只雄性白化大鼠分为9组,每组6只,连续饲养4周:第一组为正常对照组。2-9组:大鼠注射TAA (100 mg/kg, ig),每周2次。第二组为阳性对照。3、4组分别给予黑桑5、10 ml/kg b.w。第5组和第6组分别给予5、10 ml/kg b.w。7、8组分别给予5、10 ml/kg b.w。最后,第9组每日给予水飞蓟素100 mg/kg。将其与一种已知的肝保护剂和水飞蓟素进行了比较。观察各组大鼠肝损伤形态学及生化指标的变化。TAA可提高肝功能、肾功能、血脂和丙二醛水平,降低血清白蛋白、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇和CAT水平。用黑桑葚、白桑葚和醋栗汁分别处理后,生物化学指标的变化水平恢复到接近正常水平。肝脏组织的组织学检查证实了果汁对肝脏的保护作用。这些结果被大鼠肝脏结构的改善迹象所证实。结论:黑桑、白桑、醋栗汁对TAA所致大鼠肝毒性有明显的改善作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Macronutrient Composition and Starch Type of Food Formulations Based on Rice and Cowpea Varieties Proximal Composition and Chemical Properties of the Seeds and Seed Oils of Two Peanut Varieties Grown in the Republic of Congo Benefits of Natural Compounds in Diabetes Complications by Prevention and Reversing Protein Glycation and Protecting Cells against Oxidative Stress Evaluation of the Characteristics of Goat Carcasses Slaughtered at the Korhogo Slaughterhouse (Ivory Coast) Natural Compounds Modulate Apolipoprotein E Gene and Protein Expression in Fibroblasts Derived from Young and Old Female Alzheimer’s Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1