Start-ups and spin-outs: competitive strategies and effects on former employees

R. Keeley, B. Tabrizi
{"title":"Start-ups and spin-outs: competitive strategies and effects on former employees","authors":"R. Keeley, B. Tabrizi","doi":"10.1109/PICMET.1991.183752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors present an empirical study of the positive and negative effects of start-ups and spin-outs, using a sample of 49 companies from a cross section of technology-based industries. These 49 start-ups are representative of venture capital backed companies in the 1970s and 1980s. The authors examine their circumstances at the times they were formed and their longer-term impact on their industries. Few cases in which the start-up might be judged as competing with a former employer (two out of 49) are found. In 16 cases the idea for the product had existed at a former employer, but it was pursued in only three of them. In almost 40% of the cases, both the start-ups and the former employer became leading firms in their industries. Overall, for this sample the benefits from start-ups and spin-outs are considerable, while the negative effects are minor. It is concluded that the new companies tend to move into new markets, not yet occupied by established companies, and even when they enter existing markets, they are seldom in the same market segment as the former employer.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":22349,"journal":{"name":"Technology Management : the New International Language","volume":"12 1","pages":"625-630"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology Management : the New International Language","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.1991.183752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The authors present an empirical study of the positive and negative effects of start-ups and spin-outs, using a sample of 49 companies from a cross section of technology-based industries. These 49 start-ups are representative of venture capital backed companies in the 1970s and 1980s. The authors examine their circumstances at the times they were formed and their longer-term impact on their industries. Few cases in which the start-up might be judged as competing with a former employer (two out of 49) are found. In 16 cases the idea for the product had existed at a former employer, but it was pursued in only three of them. In almost 40% of the cases, both the start-ups and the former employer became leading firms in their industries. Overall, for this sample the benefits from start-ups and spin-outs are considerable, while the negative effects are minor. It is concluded that the new companies tend to move into new markets, not yet occupied by established companies, and even when they enter existing markets, they are seldom in the same market segment as the former employer.<>
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初创企业与分拆:竞争策略及其对前雇员的影响
作者对初创企业和分拆企业的积极和消极影响进行了实证研究,使用了来自技术行业横截面的49家公司的样本。这49家初创企业是20世纪70年代和80年代风险资本支持的公司的代表。作者考察了它们形成时的环境,以及它们对所在行业的长期影响。在49个案例中,只有2个案例被认为是在与前雇主竞争。在16个案例中,产品的创意来自于前雇主,但只有3个案例将其付诸实践。在近40%的案例中,创业公司和前雇主都成为了所在行业的领军企业。总的来说,对于这个样本来说,创业和分拆带来的好处是相当大的,而负面影响很小。结论是,新公司倾向于进入尚未被老牌公司占领的新市场,即使他们进入现有市场,他们也很少与前雇主处于同一细分市场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Defining the modernization capabilities of the small and medium-sized businesses Knowledge building and concurrent engineering in manufacturing automation Measuring project progress by work sampling An empirical investigation of the relationship between science, technology, and total factor productivity growth rate Strategic technology planning-developing roadmaps for competitive advantage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1