Dictators Never Die: Political Transition, Dynastic Regime Recovery and the 2021 Suharto Commemoration in Indonesia

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES Contemporary Southeast Asia Pub Date : 2023-01-29 DOI:10.1355/cs44-3b
A. Tyson, Nawawī
{"title":"Dictators Never Die: Political Transition, Dynastic Regime Recovery and the 2021 Suharto Commemoration in Indonesia","authors":"A. Tyson, Nawawī","doi":"10.1355/cs44-3b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Political transition theory has clear indicators for successful democratization, including the two-turnover test in elections, rule of law, press freedom and institutional reform. However, the distinction between system change and regime change remains ambiguous. After rapid political transitions from authoritarian to democratic systems, old guard elites seek to recapture power and protect their wealth in countries such as Indonesia and the Philippines. The authors characterize this as a process of dynastic regime recovery, with elite networks seeking to control discursive spaces as part of a broader strategy to regain political power and legitimacy. Political distortions persist in rapid transitions to democracy, and this article examines the ways in which interlocking elites from the Suharto era strategically adapted to Indonesia's competitive multi-party system. The authors gathered data from 21 interviews with the Suharto family and their associates, as well as observations from an exclusive commemorative event celebrating the centenary of Suharto's birth in June 2021. The centenary celebration was a network-led revanchist effort to promote a positive narrative about Suharto's presidency, as a constituent part of a complex regime recovery strategy. The 2022 election of Ferdinand \"Bongbong\" Marcos Jr. in the Philippines indicates that there are opportunities for the rehabilitation of formerly discredited political dynasties. The recovery of the Suharto family legacy, business networks and political party coalitions has yet to ensure institutional recapture or electoral victory, but it is too soon to write a definitive political obituary.","PeriodicalId":46227,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Southeast Asia","volume":"394 1","pages":"421 - 452"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Southeast Asia","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1355/cs44-3b","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Political transition theory has clear indicators for successful democratization, including the two-turnover test in elections, rule of law, press freedom and institutional reform. However, the distinction between system change and regime change remains ambiguous. After rapid political transitions from authoritarian to democratic systems, old guard elites seek to recapture power and protect their wealth in countries such as Indonesia and the Philippines. The authors characterize this as a process of dynastic regime recovery, with elite networks seeking to control discursive spaces as part of a broader strategy to regain political power and legitimacy. Political distortions persist in rapid transitions to democracy, and this article examines the ways in which interlocking elites from the Suharto era strategically adapted to Indonesia's competitive multi-party system. The authors gathered data from 21 interviews with the Suharto family and their associates, as well as observations from an exclusive commemorative event celebrating the centenary of Suharto's birth in June 2021. The centenary celebration was a network-led revanchist effort to promote a positive narrative about Suharto's presidency, as a constituent part of a complex regime recovery strategy. The 2022 election of Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr. in the Philippines indicates that there are opportunities for the rehabilitation of formerly discredited political dynasties. The recovery of the Suharto family legacy, business networks and political party coalitions has yet to ensure institutional recapture or electoral victory, but it is too soon to write a definitive political obituary.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
独裁者不死:印尼政治转型、王朝政权恢复和2021年苏哈托纪念活动
摘要:政治转型理论有明确的民主化成功指标,包括选举的两次更替测试、法治、新闻自由和体制改革。然而,制度变化和政权变化之间的区别仍然模糊不清。在印尼和菲律宾等国,在经历了从独裁体制到民主体制的快速政治转型后,保守派精英寻求重新掌权并保护自己的财富。作者将其描述为一个王朝政权恢复的过程,精英网络寻求控制话语空间,作为重新获得政治权力和合法性的更广泛战略的一部分。在向民主的快速过渡中,政治扭曲依然存在,本文考察了苏哈托时代相互联系的精英们如何在战略上适应印尼竞争激烈的多党制。作者收集的数据来自对苏哈托家族及其同事的21次采访,以及2021年6月苏哈托诞辰100周年的独家纪念活动的观察结果。这场百年庆典是一场网络主导的复仇主义努力,旨在宣传苏哈托总统任期的正面形象,作为复杂的政权复兴战略的组成部分。2022年菲律宾小费迪南德·“奉奉”·马科斯(Ferdinand“Bongbong”Marcos Jr.)的当选表明,曾经声名狼藉的政治王朝有机会东山再起。苏哈托(Suharto)家族遗产、商业网络和政党联盟的恢复,尚未确保政权的重新夺回或选举的胜利,但现在写一篇明确的政治讣告还为时过早。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Contemporary Southeast Asia (CSEA) is one of the ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute''s flagship publications. Now in its fourth decade of publication, CSEA has succeeded in building up an international reputation as one of Southeast Asia''s premier academic journals. The aim of the peer reviewed journal is to provide subscribers with up to date and in-depth analysis of critical trends and developments in Southeast Asia and the wider Asia-Pacific region. The primary focus of the journal is on issues related to domestic politics in Southeast Asian countries, regional architecture and community building, military, strategic and security affairs, conflict zones and relations among the Great Powers. CSEA publishes authoritative, insightful and original contributions from scholars, think-tank analysts, journalists and policy-makers from across the globe. The Editorial Committee is guided by the advice of the International Advisory Committee which is composed of eminent scholars from Asia, the United States, Australia and Europe.
期刊最新文献
Parties, Patronage and COVID-19 Vaccination Distribution in Indonesia Dictators Never Die: Political Transition, Dynastic Regime Recovery and the 2021 Suharto Commemoration in Indonesia How do Filipinos Remember Their History? A Descriptive Account of Filipino Historical Memory ASEAN's Socialization of Myanmar: Perilous Ambivalence, the 2021 Coup and the Way Forward Teaching International Relations in the Philippines: Opening Spaces While Maintaining Traditional Approaches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1