Teaching International Relations in the Philippines: Opening Spaces While Maintaining Traditional Approaches

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES Contemporary Southeast Asia Pub Date : 2022-11-22 DOI:10.1355/cs44-2f
H. Kraft
{"title":"Teaching International Relations in the Philippines: Opening Spaces While Maintaining Traditional Approaches","authors":"H. Kraft","doi":"10.1355/cs44-2f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Teaching IR in the Philippines can best be understood in terms of an evolving process that has been significantly influenced by the country's colonial experience under the United States. The development of the field is largely contextualized as a part of the discipline of Political Science. The latter in turn was situated less as an academic field and more as preparatory course for those pursuing a law degree or a career in the colonial bureaucracy. However, greater attention is now being paid to academic pursuit as an objective of higher education in the Philippines—and the consequent attention to more theoretical research and the teaching of IR as a field of study not completely beholden to the need to produce bureaucrats and technocrats for foreign policy work. There is an increasing diversity in the types of research interests pursued by IR scholars in the country. This diversity ranges from the expansion of the issues being explored to a special focus on widening the theoretical and methodological approaches that local scholars adopt. At the same time, however, the field continues to be embedded in its antecedent purpose of providing training for aspiring diplomats and foreign-policy bureaucrats. The evolution of IR in the Philippines, and the subsequent direction of the field, continue to be influenced by its historical antecedents and its emphasis on a pragmatic appreciation of what needs to be understood through the study of IR.","PeriodicalId":46227,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Southeast Asia","volume":"23 1","pages":"274 - 288"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Southeast Asia","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1355/cs44-2f","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Teaching IR in the Philippines can best be understood in terms of an evolving process that has been significantly influenced by the country's colonial experience under the United States. The development of the field is largely contextualized as a part of the discipline of Political Science. The latter in turn was situated less as an academic field and more as preparatory course for those pursuing a law degree or a career in the colonial bureaucracy. However, greater attention is now being paid to academic pursuit as an objective of higher education in the Philippines—and the consequent attention to more theoretical research and the teaching of IR as a field of study not completely beholden to the need to produce bureaucrats and technocrats for foreign policy work. There is an increasing diversity in the types of research interests pursued by IR scholars in the country. This diversity ranges from the expansion of the issues being explored to a special focus on widening the theoretical and methodological approaches that local scholars adopt. At the same time, however, the field continues to be embedded in its antecedent purpose of providing training for aspiring diplomats and foreign-policy bureaucrats. The evolution of IR in the Philippines, and the subsequent direction of the field, continue to be influenced by its historical antecedents and its emphasis on a pragmatic appreciation of what needs to be understood through the study of IR.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
菲律宾的国际关系教学:在保持传统方法的同时开放空间
摘要:菲律宾的国际关系教学是一个不断演变的过程,深受美国殖民时期的影响。该领域的发展在很大程度上是作为政治学学科的一部分。反过来,后者与其说是一个学术领域,不如说是那些在殖民地官僚机构中攻读法律学位或职业生涯的人的预备课程。然而,菲律宾高等教育现在更加重视学术追求,将其作为一项目标,并因此关注更多的理论研究,以及将国际关系作为一个研究领域的教学,而不是完全依赖于为外交政策工作培养官僚和技术官僚的需要。国内国际关系学者追求的研究兴趣类型越来越多样化。这种多样性包括从正在探索的问题的扩展到特别关注扩大当地学者采用的理论和方法方法。然而,与此同时,该领域继续嵌入其先前的目标,即为有抱负的外交官和外交政策官僚提供培训。国际关系在菲律宾的演变,以及该领域随后的发展方向,继续受到其历史渊源的影响,并强调通过国际关系研究需要理解的内容的实用主义欣赏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Contemporary Southeast Asia (CSEA) is one of the ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute''s flagship publications. Now in its fourth decade of publication, CSEA has succeeded in building up an international reputation as one of Southeast Asia''s premier academic journals. The aim of the peer reviewed journal is to provide subscribers with up to date and in-depth analysis of critical trends and developments in Southeast Asia and the wider Asia-Pacific region. The primary focus of the journal is on issues related to domestic politics in Southeast Asian countries, regional architecture and community building, military, strategic and security affairs, conflict zones and relations among the Great Powers. CSEA publishes authoritative, insightful and original contributions from scholars, think-tank analysts, journalists and policy-makers from across the globe. The Editorial Committee is guided by the advice of the International Advisory Committee which is composed of eminent scholars from Asia, the United States, Australia and Europe.
期刊最新文献
Parties, Patronage and COVID-19 Vaccination Distribution in Indonesia Dictators Never Die: Political Transition, Dynastic Regime Recovery and the 2021 Suharto Commemoration in Indonesia How do Filipinos Remember Their History? A Descriptive Account of Filipino Historical Memory ASEAN's Socialization of Myanmar: Perilous Ambivalence, the 2021 Coup and the Way Forward Teaching International Relations in the Philippines: Opening Spaces While Maintaining Traditional Approaches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1