Radical studying for another world: A conversation with Eli Meyerhoff

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Review of Education Pedagogy and Cultural Studies Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1080/10714413.2022.2139556
A. Means, Amy N. Sojot, E. Meyerhoff
{"title":"Radical studying for another world: A conversation with Eli Meyerhoff","authors":"A. Means, Amy N. Sojot, E. Meyerhoff","doi":"10.1080/10714413.2022.2139556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following is a conversation between Eli Meyerhoff, Amy Sojot, and Alexander Means. The three discuss ideas from Meyerhoff’s Beyond Education: Radical Studying for Another World (University of Minnesota Press, 2019) a groundbreaking work of political theory that challenges received liberal, progressive, and radical approaches to the university and to pedagogy. The conversation touches on a number themes such as study and world making, university and labor struggles, the emotional economy of neoliberal education, and abolition. Amy: Beyond Education is an innovative work. And we wanted to begin by asking you, how would you characterize this book? It seems that one of the things the book is attempting to do is to disrupt categories of academic inquiry. It straddles a number of different areas such as political theory, feminist theory, historical and new materialisms, educational philosophy, social history, and genealogical analyses. On a meta-level, how do you conceptualize this book? Eli: It’s interdisciplinary work definitely. I’m coming from a political theory disciplinary background, but the work brings together several different methodologies. There’s a critical genealogy of education in a few historical chapters that try to unsettle our sense of the inevitability of education as the best, only possible way of studying in the world. I also have a chapter that I would characterize as embedded militant research, based on my involvement in a radical anarchistic study project, called the Experimental College of the Twin Cities, where we appropriated resources from normal universities and used those resources for putting on free self-organized classes that share ties with radical movements. The book is also engaging with contemporary debates about higher education, intervening in how we understand the university today. I see the university as a terrain of struggle between different ways of studying and different ways of making the world. My book uses historical, ethnographic, and theoretical tools to help us to understand that terrain of struggle better.","PeriodicalId":45129,"journal":{"name":"Review of Education Pedagogy and Cultural Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Education Pedagogy and Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10714413.2022.2139556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The following is a conversation between Eli Meyerhoff, Amy Sojot, and Alexander Means. The three discuss ideas from Meyerhoff’s Beyond Education: Radical Studying for Another World (University of Minnesota Press, 2019) a groundbreaking work of political theory that challenges received liberal, progressive, and radical approaches to the university and to pedagogy. The conversation touches on a number themes such as study and world making, university and labor struggles, the emotional economy of neoliberal education, and abolition. Amy: Beyond Education is an innovative work. And we wanted to begin by asking you, how would you characterize this book? It seems that one of the things the book is attempting to do is to disrupt categories of academic inquiry. It straddles a number of different areas such as political theory, feminist theory, historical and new materialisms, educational philosophy, social history, and genealogical analyses. On a meta-level, how do you conceptualize this book? Eli: It’s interdisciplinary work definitely. I’m coming from a political theory disciplinary background, but the work brings together several different methodologies. There’s a critical genealogy of education in a few historical chapters that try to unsettle our sense of the inevitability of education as the best, only possible way of studying in the world. I also have a chapter that I would characterize as embedded militant research, based on my involvement in a radical anarchistic study project, called the Experimental College of the Twin Cities, where we appropriated resources from normal universities and used those resources for putting on free self-organized classes that share ties with radical movements. The book is also engaging with contemporary debates about higher education, intervening in how we understand the university today. I see the university as a terrain of struggle between different ways of studying and different ways of making the world. My book uses historical, ethnographic, and theoretical tools to help us to understand that terrain of struggle better.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为另一个世界进行激进的学习:与伊莱·迈耶霍夫的对话
以下是Eli Meyerhoff, Amy Sojot和Alexander Means之间的对话。三人讨论了迈耶霍夫的《超越教育:为另一个世界激进学习》(明尼苏达大学出版社,2019年)中的观点,这是一部开创性的政治理论著作,挑战了对大学和教育学的自由主义、进步主义和激进方法。谈话涉及许多主题,如学习和世界创造,大学和劳工斗争,新自由主义教育的情感经济,以及废除。艾米:《超越教育》是一部创新作品。我们想先问你,你如何描述这本书?这本书试图做的一件事似乎就是打破学术探究的分类。它跨越了许多不同的领域,如政治理论,女权主义理论,历史和新唯物主义,教育哲学,社会史和家谱分析。在元层面上,你是如何概念化这本书的?伊莱:这绝对是跨学科的工作。我的专业背景是政治理论,但我的研究结合了几种不同的方法。在一些历史章节中,有一个批判的教育谱系,试图动摇我们对教育的必然性的认识,教育是世界上最好的,唯一可能的学习方式。我也有一章,我将其描述为嵌入的激进研究,基于我参与的一个激进的无政府主义研究项目,叫做双城实验学院,在那里我们从普通大学挪用资源,并利用这些资源建立自由的自组织课程,这些课程与激进运动有联系。这本书还参与了当代关于高等教育的辩论,介入了我们今天如何理解大学。我把大学看作是不同学习方式和不同世界观之间斗争的地方。我的书运用了历史的、人种学的和理论的工具来帮助我们更好地理解斗争的地形。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Review of Education Pedagogy and Cultural Studies
Review of Education Pedagogy and Cultural Studies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Education and Democracy at the End: The Crisis of Sense “What is the truth?:” On teaching paradoxes, race, family, and the self with Octavia Butler’s Kindred (Con)spirituality as a curriculum of immortality Ungrievable: Theorizing white Christian nationalist rhetorical practices in education Imagining the negentropic university: The madness of computation, the possibility of the uncomputable, and thinking otherwise
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1