The Relationship Between the Full Biophysical Profile and Rapid Biophysical Profile in Antepartum Fetal Surveillance

H. Pakniat, Ezzatalsadat Haji Seid Javadi, Venus Chegini, Nahid Khajevand, Simindokht Molaverdikhani
{"title":"The Relationship Between the Full Biophysical Profile and Rapid Biophysical Profile in Antepartum Fetal Surveillance","authors":"H. Pakniat, Ezzatalsadat Haji Seid Javadi, Venus Chegini, Nahid Khajevand, Simindokht Molaverdikhani","doi":"10.32598/jid.26.4.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: One of the best tests for the assessment of a fetus is the biophysical profile test which has a significant effect on the fetus’s health and the outcome of pregnancy. The present study was designed to determine the relationship between the full biophysical profile (FBP) and the rapid biophysical profile (RBP) tests in antepartum fetal surveillance. Methods: In this prospective study, Singleton pregnancies (n=209) with more than 34 weeks of gestational age were chosen. Both FBP and RBP tests were performed for all the patients. The main outcome is the Apgar score and neonatal intensive care unit admission analyzed by SPSS software, version 24. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of RBP were calculated. Findings: Out of 209 people who entered the study, 48 women (23.0%) had gestational diabetes, 84 women (40.2%) had hypertension pregnancy (preeclampsia), 45 people (21.5%) had intrauterine growth restriction, and 45 women (21.5%) had post-date pregnancy. For predicting adverse fetal outcomes of pregnancy, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of RBP were 95%, 73%, 52%, and 98%, respectively. Conclusion: According to the statistically significant positive correlation between RBP and FBP and its simple and rapid application, RBP might be an acceptable alternative method for primary antepartum fetal screening tests in overcrowded obstetrics centers.","PeriodicalId":91544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of inflammatory bowel diseases & disorders","volume":"6401 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of inflammatory bowel diseases & disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/jid.26.4.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: One of the best tests for the assessment of a fetus is the biophysical profile test which has a significant effect on the fetus’s health and the outcome of pregnancy. The present study was designed to determine the relationship between the full biophysical profile (FBP) and the rapid biophysical profile (RBP) tests in antepartum fetal surveillance. Methods: In this prospective study, Singleton pregnancies (n=209) with more than 34 weeks of gestational age were chosen. Both FBP and RBP tests were performed for all the patients. The main outcome is the Apgar score and neonatal intensive care unit admission analyzed by SPSS software, version 24. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of RBP were calculated. Findings: Out of 209 people who entered the study, 48 women (23.0%) had gestational diabetes, 84 women (40.2%) had hypertension pregnancy (preeclampsia), 45 people (21.5%) had intrauterine growth restriction, and 45 women (21.5%) had post-date pregnancy. For predicting adverse fetal outcomes of pregnancy, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of RBP were 95%, 73%, 52%, and 98%, respectively. Conclusion: According to the statistically significant positive correlation between RBP and FBP and its simple and rapid application, RBP might be an acceptable alternative method for primary antepartum fetal screening tests in overcrowded obstetrics centers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产前胎儿监测中全生物物理特征与快速生物物理特征的关系
背景:生物体格检查是评估胎儿的最佳检查之一,它对胎儿的健康和妊娠结局有重要影响。本研究旨在确定全生物物理特征(FBP)和快速生物物理特征(RBP)试验在产前胎儿监测中的关系。方法:在这项前瞻性研究中,选择胎龄大于34周的单胎妊娠(n=209)。所有患者均行FBP和RBP试验。主要观察指标为Apgar评分和新生儿重症监护病房入住情况,采用SPSS软件进行分析。计算RBP的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。结果:在209名参与研究的女性中,48名女性(23.0%)患有妊娠糖尿病,84名女性(40.2%)患有高血压妊娠(先兆子痫),45名女性(21.5%)患有宫内生长受限,45名女性(21.5%)患有产后妊娠。预测妊娠不良胎儿结局,RBP的敏感性为95%,特异性为73%,阳性预测值为52%,阴性预测值为98%。结论:RBP与FBP呈正相关,且应用简便、快速,可作为拥挤产科中心产前胎儿筛查的一种可接受的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Immunophenotyping of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Qazvin City, Iran: A Cross-Sectional Study Effect of Antioxidant on Sperm Freezing The Relationship Between the Full Biophysical Profile and Rapid Biophysical Profile in Antepartum Fetal Surveillance The Inflammatory Markers C-reactive Protein and Mean Platelet Volume in Chronic Kidney Disease Humic and Fulvic Acids Induced Thermodynamic and Structural Instability of Tyrosinase With Antiproliferative Effect on A375 Melanoma Cancer Cell Line
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1