Triage scales, used in inpatient emergency departments (review article)

Nurgul Kulmanova, M. Saduov
{"title":"Triage scales, used in inpatient emergency departments (review article)","authors":"Nurgul Kulmanova, M. Saduov","doi":"10.31082/1728-452x-2020-217-218-7-8-44-52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article describes different types of sorting scales used in inpatient emergency departments in different countries. Triage scales are designed to optimize patient waiting times according to the severity of their medical condition in order to treat the most intense symptom as quickly as possible and reduce the negative impact on the prognosis of a long delay before starting treatment. The aim of the study is to analyze the literature data describing the scales for triage in the emergency department, their comparative characteristics, and assessment of their reliability and reliability. Material and methods. An online literature research was conducted in databases such as Pubmed, Web of Science and Scopus, as well as on-line publications in Russian and English languages. The following terms were used to search for relevant literature sources: emergency department, triage, emergency severity index. A total of 813 literary sources were found, 37 of which were selected for further analysis. Inclusion criteria: studies performed in people, published in English, Russian, as well as full versions of articles. Exclusion criteria: summary of reports, newspaper publications, personal messages. Results and discussion. Analysis of the literature data allows us to judge a variety of approaches and systems of medical sorting of patients requiring emergency medical care, especially in cases of mass disasters and injuries. Analysis of existing sorting scales has shown that these scales are fivestep and adapted to the region and the health system, but there is no single universal scale. Conclusion. The introduction of structured triage by specially trained medical personnel in the emergency Department helps to accurately identify patients whose lives are at risk, especially during periods of insufficient treatment effectiveness. Therefore, five-level triage systems are recommended by national and international societies of emergency medicine. Keywords: triage, system triage, emergency severity index, emergency department.","PeriodicalId":14842,"journal":{"name":"Journal \"Medicine\"","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal \"Medicine\"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31082/1728-452x-2020-217-218-7-8-44-52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article describes different types of sorting scales used in inpatient emergency departments in different countries. Triage scales are designed to optimize patient waiting times according to the severity of their medical condition in order to treat the most intense symptom as quickly as possible and reduce the negative impact on the prognosis of a long delay before starting treatment. The aim of the study is to analyze the literature data describing the scales for triage in the emergency department, their comparative characteristics, and assessment of their reliability and reliability. Material and methods. An online literature research was conducted in databases such as Pubmed, Web of Science and Scopus, as well as on-line publications in Russian and English languages. The following terms were used to search for relevant literature sources: emergency department, triage, emergency severity index. A total of 813 literary sources were found, 37 of which were selected for further analysis. Inclusion criteria: studies performed in people, published in English, Russian, as well as full versions of articles. Exclusion criteria: summary of reports, newspaper publications, personal messages. Results and discussion. Analysis of the literature data allows us to judge a variety of approaches and systems of medical sorting of patients requiring emergency medical care, especially in cases of mass disasters and injuries. Analysis of existing sorting scales has shown that these scales are fivestep and adapted to the region and the health system, but there is no single universal scale. Conclusion. The introduction of structured triage by specially trained medical personnel in the emergency Department helps to accurately identify patients whose lives are at risk, especially during periods of insufficient treatment effectiveness. Therefore, five-level triage systems are recommended by national and international societies of emergency medicine. Keywords: triage, system triage, emergency severity index, emergency department.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分诊量表,用于住院急诊科(综述文章)
本文介绍了不同国家住院急诊科使用的不同类型的分选量表。分诊量表的设计是为了根据患者病情的严重程度优化患者的等待时间,以便尽快治疗最严重的症状,并减少开始治疗前长时间延误对预后的负面影响。本研究的目的是分析描述急诊科分诊量表的文献资料,其比较特点,并评估其信度和可靠性。材料和方法。在Pubmed、Web of Science和Scopus等数据库以及俄语和英语在线出版物中进行了在线文献研究。使用以下术语搜索相关文献来源:急诊科、分诊、急症严重程度指数。共找到813个文献资料,选取其中37个作进一步分析。纳入标准:在人身上进行的研究,以英文、俄文发表,以及文章的完整版本。排除标准:报告摘要、报纸出版物、个人信息。结果和讨论。对文献数据的分析使我们能够判断各种需要紧急医疗护理的患者的医疗分类方法和系统,特别是在大规模灾害和伤害的情况下。对现有分类量表的分析表明,这些量表分为五步,并适应区域和卫生系统,但没有单一的通用量表。结论。在急诊科由受过专门训练的医务人员进行有组织的分诊,有助于准确识别有生命危险的病人,特别是在治疗效果不足的时期。因此,国家和国际急救医学协会推荐采用五级分诊系统。关键词:分诊,系统分诊,严重程度指标,急诊科。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The conception of the probable role of the biological active chromium in the emergence of insulin resistance and alimentary obesity Frequency of symptoms of temporominal joint dysfunction in children and adolescents in orphanages Human teeth enamel as a test for assessing the consequences of radiation pollution of the environment Essential tremor not just a tremor (review) Neurological manifestations of tuberous sclerosis in children (own observations)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1