Ethical-Reparative Reconfigurations of the Literary Today

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE CLCWEB-Comparative Literature and Culture Pub Date : 2022-03-08 DOI:10.7771/1481-4374.3752
A. Cechinel
{"title":"Ethical-Reparative Reconfigurations of the Literary Today","authors":"A. Cechinel","doi":"10.7771/1481-4374.3752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay aims to debate the evidence of an ethical-reparative function for literature and literary studies today. Therefore, it is divided into two fundamental moments, two argumentative channels that, without a totalizing intention, point out the general perspective of a changing scenario. On the one hand, the literature of the 20th century is presented from the image of a supposed negativity or radical intransitivity, capable of “undoing the work” in its “aesthetics of suppression”. On the other hand, from an introductory debate around some of the places of transitivity envisioned for literature at the beginning of the 21st century, the literary is now conceived as an ethical-reparative field, responsible, among others, for “giving visibility”, “remembering”, “repairing damage”, 1 Departamento de Letras, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense: <andrecechinel@ gmail.com>.","PeriodicalId":44033,"journal":{"name":"CLCWEB-Comparative Literature and Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CLCWEB-Comparative Literature and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.3752","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay aims to debate the evidence of an ethical-reparative function for literature and literary studies today. Therefore, it is divided into two fundamental moments, two argumentative channels that, without a totalizing intention, point out the general perspective of a changing scenario. On the one hand, the literature of the 20th century is presented from the image of a supposed negativity or radical intransitivity, capable of “undoing the work” in its “aesthetics of suppression”. On the other hand, from an introductory debate around some of the places of transitivity envisioned for literature at the beginning of the 21st century, the literary is now conceived as an ethical-reparative field, responsible, among others, for “giving visibility”, “remembering”, “repairing damage”, 1 Departamento de Letras, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense: .
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当代文学的伦理修复性重构
本文旨在讨论文学和文学研究的伦理修复功能的证据。因此,它被分为两个基本时刻,两个争论的渠道,没有总体的意图,指出了一个变化的场景的总体观点。一方面,20世纪的文学以一种假定的消极性或激进的不及物性的形象呈现,能够在其“压抑美学”中“毁灭作品”。另一方面,从21世纪初关于文学的及物性设想的一些地方的介绍性辩论来看,文学现在被认为是一个伦理修复领域,除其他外,负责“给予可见性”,“记忆”,“修复损害”,1 Departamento de Letras, universuniversade do Extremo Sul Catarinense:。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
45
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The intellectual trajectory of CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture is located in the humanities and social sciences in the discipline of comparative literature and the field of cultural studies designated as "comparative cultural studies." Comparative cultural studies is a contextual approach in the study of culture in all of its products and processes; its theoretical and methodological framework is built on tenets borrowed from the discipline of comparative literature and the field of cultural studies and from a range of thought including literary and culture theory, systems theory, and communication theories; in comparative cultural studies focus is on theory and method, as well as on application; in comparative cultural studies metaphorical argumentation and description are discouraged; the intellectual trajectory of the journal includes the postulate to work in a global and intercultural context with a plurality of methods and approaches, and in interdisciplinarity in the study of the processes of communicative action(s) in culture, the production and processes of culture, the products of culture, and the study of the how of these processes; the epistemological bases of comparative cultural studies are in (radical) constructivism and in methodology the contextual (systemic and empirical) approach is favored (however, comparative cultural studies does not exclude textual analysis proper or other established fields of scholarship).
期刊最新文献
Ecopoetry as Method: Reading Gary Snyder as a Cultural Mediator between China and the World On Gary Snyder’s Tradaptation of <em>Cold Mountain Poems</em> and its Spiritual Salvation and Literary Enlightenment in Postwar America Translating Literary Ideology from Ancient Chinese into Modern French: François Cheng’s Francophone Poetry in <em>Double chant</em> (2000) Playing with Time: Writing History in Neo-Zionist Hebrew Literature Westernization or Localization? The (Mis)reading of “the Tragic” in Modern Chinese Literary Discourse
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1