A framework for precision "dosing" of mental healthcare services: algorithm development and clinical pilot.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY International Journal of Mental Health Systems Pub Date : 2023-07-05 DOI:10.1186/s13033-023-00581-y
Jonathan Knights, Victoria Bangieva, Michela Passoni, Macayla L Donegan, Jacob Shen, Audrey Klein, Justin Baker, Holly DuBois
{"title":"A framework for precision \"dosing\" of mental healthcare services: algorithm development and clinical pilot.","authors":"Jonathan Knights,&nbsp;Victoria Bangieva,&nbsp;Michela Passoni,&nbsp;Macayla L Donegan,&nbsp;Jacob Shen,&nbsp;Audrey Klein,&nbsp;Justin Baker,&nbsp;Holly DuBois","doi":"10.1186/s13033-023-00581-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One in five adults in the US experience mental illness and over half of these adults do not receive treatment. In addition to the access gap, few innovations have been reported for ensuring the right level of mental healthcare service is available at the right time for individual patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Historical observational clinical data was leveraged from a virtual healthcare system. We conceptualize mental healthcare services themselves as therapeutic interventions and develop a prototype computational framework to estimate their potential longitudinal impacts on depressive symptom severity, which is then used to assess new treatment schedules and delivered to clinicians via a dashboard. We operationally define this process as \"session dosing\": 497 patients who started treatment with severe symptoms of depression between November 2020 and October 2021 were used for modeling. Subsequently, 22 mental health providers participated in a 5-week clinical quality improvement (QI) pilot, where they utilized the prototype dashboard in treatment planning with 126 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The developed framework was able to resolve patient symptom fluctuations from their treatment schedules: 77% of the modeling dataset fit criteria for using the individual fits for subsequent clinical planning where five anecdotal profile types were identified that presented different clinical opportunities. Based on initial quality thresholds for model fits, 88% of those individuals were identified as adequate for session optimization planning using the developed dashboard, while 12% supported more thorough treatment planning (e.g. different treatment modalities). In the clinical pilot, 90% of clinicians reported using the dashboard a few times or more per member. Although most clinicians (67.5%) either rarely or never used the dashboard to change session types, numerous other discussions were enabled, and opportunities for automating session recommendations were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is possible to model and identify the extent to which mental healthcare services can resolve depressive symptom severity fluctuations. Implementation of one such prototype framework in a real-world clinic represents an advancement in mental healthcare treatment planning; however, investigations to assess which clinical endpoints are impacted by this technology, and the best way to incorporate such frameworks into clinical workflows, are needed and are actively being pursued.</p>","PeriodicalId":47752,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10320892/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-023-00581-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: One in five adults in the US experience mental illness and over half of these adults do not receive treatment. In addition to the access gap, few innovations have been reported for ensuring the right level of mental healthcare service is available at the right time for individual patients.

Methods: Historical observational clinical data was leveraged from a virtual healthcare system. We conceptualize mental healthcare services themselves as therapeutic interventions and develop a prototype computational framework to estimate their potential longitudinal impacts on depressive symptom severity, which is then used to assess new treatment schedules and delivered to clinicians via a dashboard. We operationally define this process as "session dosing": 497 patients who started treatment with severe symptoms of depression between November 2020 and October 2021 were used for modeling. Subsequently, 22 mental health providers participated in a 5-week clinical quality improvement (QI) pilot, where they utilized the prototype dashboard in treatment planning with 126 patients.

Results: The developed framework was able to resolve patient symptom fluctuations from their treatment schedules: 77% of the modeling dataset fit criteria for using the individual fits for subsequent clinical planning where five anecdotal profile types were identified that presented different clinical opportunities. Based on initial quality thresholds for model fits, 88% of those individuals were identified as adequate for session optimization planning using the developed dashboard, while 12% supported more thorough treatment planning (e.g. different treatment modalities). In the clinical pilot, 90% of clinicians reported using the dashboard a few times or more per member. Although most clinicians (67.5%) either rarely or never used the dashboard to change session types, numerous other discussions were enabled, and opportunities for automating session recommendations were identified.

Conclusions: It is possible to model and identify the extent to which mental healthcare services can resolve depressive symptom severity fluctuations. Implementation of one such prototype framework in a real-world clinic represents an advancement in mental healthcare treatment planning; however, investigations to assess which clinical endpoints are impacted by this technology, and the best way to incorporate such frameworks into clinical workflows, are needed and are actively being pursued.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神保健服务精确“剂量”的框架:算法开发和临床试验。
背景:美国五分之一的成年人患有精神疾病,其中一半以上的成年人没有接受治疗。除了获取方面的差距之外,据报道,在确保在适当的时间为个别患者提供适当水平的精神卫生保健服务方面,几乎没有创新。方法:利用虚拟医疗保健系统的历史观察性临床数据。我们将精神卫生保健服务本身概念化为治疗干预措施,并开发了一个原型计算框架,以估计其对抑郁症状严重程度的潜在纵向影响,然后用于评估新的治疗方案,并通过仪表板交付给临床医生。我们在操作上将这一过程定义为“疗程给药”:497名在2020年11月至2021年10月期间开始接受严重抑郁症状治疗的患者被用于建模。随后,22名心理健康提供者参加了为期5周的临床质量改善(QI)试点,他们在126名患者的治疗计划中使用了原型仪表板。结果:开发的框架能够从其治疗计划中解决患者症状波动:77%的建模数据集适合使用个体适合随后临床计划的标准,其中确定了五种轶事概况类型,呈现不同的临床机会。根据模型拟合的初始质量阈值,88%的人被确定为足以使用开发的仪表板进行会话优化计划,而12%的人支持更彻底的治疗计划(例如不同的治疗方式)。在临床试验中,90%的临床医生报告每位成员使用仪表板几次或更多次。尽管大多数临床医生(67.5%)很少或从未使用仪表板来更改会话类型,但仍有许多其他讨论被启用,并且确定了自动化会话建议的机会。结论:有可能建立模型并确定精神卫生保健服务在多大程度上可以解决抑郁症状严重程度的波动。在现实世界的诊所中实施一个这样的原型框架代表了精神保健治疗计划的进步;然而,评估哪些临床终点受到这项技术的影响,以及将这些框架纳入临床工作流程的最佳方式的调查是必要的,并且正在积极进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impact of informal employment on individuals’ psychological well-being: microevidence from China Co-creating community wellbeing initiatives: what is the evidence and how do they work? Knowledge, attitudes, and practices on child and adolescent mental health among healthcare workers in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review. Diagnostic pattern of mental, neurological and substance use disorders at primary health care facilities in Uganda. Prevalence of common mental disorder and its association with perceived stigma and social support among people living with HIV/AIDS in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1