在故障分析中使用本体

Anna Safont-Andreu, C. Burmer, Konstantin Schekotihin
{"title":"在故障分析中使用本体","authors":"Anna Safont-Andreu, C. Burmer, Konstantin Schekotihin","doi":"10.31399/asm.cp.istfa2021p0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Fault analysis is a complex task that requires electrical engineers to perform various analyses to detect and localize a physical defect. The analysis process is very knowledge-intensive and must be precisely documented to report the issue to customers as well as to ensure the best possible reuse of the acquired experience in similar future analyses. However, writing unambiguous documentation can be complicated for many reasons, such as selecting details and results to be presented in a report, or the naming of terms and their definition. To avoid some of these issues, FA engineers must agree on a clearly defined terminology specifying methods, physical faults and their electrical signatures, tools, and relations between them. Moreover, to allow FA software systems to use this terminology, it must be stored in a format that can be interpreted similarly by both engineers and software.\n This paper presents an approach that solves these challenges by using an ontology describing FA-relevant terminology using a logic-based representation. The latter guarantees the same interpretation of the defined terms by engineers and software systems, which can use it to perform various tasks like text classification, information retrieval, or workflow verification.","PeriodicalId":188323,"journal":{"name":"ISTFA 2021: Conference Proceedings from the 47th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Ontologies in Failure Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Anna Safont-Andreu, C. Burmer, Konstantin Schekotihin\",\"doi\":\"10.31399/asm.cp.istfa2021p0023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Fault analysis is a complex task that requires electrical engineers to perform various analyses to detect and localize a physical defect. The analysis process is very knowledge-intensive and must be precisely documented to report the issue to customers as well as to ensure the best possible reuse of the acquired experience in similar future analyses. However, writing unambiguous documentation can be complicated for many reasons, such as selecting details and results to be presented in a report, or the naming of terms and their definition. To avoid some of these issues, FA engineers must agree on a clearly defined terminology specifying methods, physical faults and their electrical signatures, tools, and relations between them. Moreover, to allow FA software systems to use this terminology, it must be stored in a format that can be interpreted similarly by both engineers and software.\\n This paper presents an approach that solves these challenges by using an ontology describing FA-relevant terminology using a logic-based representation. The latter guarantees the same interpretation of the defined terms by engineers and software systems, which can use it to perform various tasks like text classification, information retrieval, or workflow verification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":188323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISTFA 2021: Conference Proceedings from the 47th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISTFA 2021: Conference Proceedings from the 47th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31399/asm.cp.istfa2021p0023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISTFA 2021: Conference Proceedings from the 47th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31399/asm.cp.istfa2021p0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

故障分析是一项复杂的任务,需要电气工程师执行各种分析来检测和定位物理缺陷。分析过程是非常知识密集型的,必须精确地记录下来,以便向客户报告问题,并确保在类似的未来分析中尽可能地重用所获得的经验。然而,由于许多原因,编写明确的文档可能会很复杂,例如选择要在报告中显示的细节和结果,或者术语的命名及其定义。为了避免这些问题,FA工程师必须在明确定义的术语上达成一致,具体说明方法、物理故障及其电气特征、工具以及它们之间的关系。此外,为了允许FA软件系统使用这个术语,它必须以工程师和软件都可以类似地解释的格式存储。本文提出了一种解决这些挑战的方法,通过使用基于逻辑的表示来描述fa相关术语的本体。后者保证了工程师和软件系统对定义的术语的相同解释,软件系统可以使用它来执行各种任务,如文本分类、信息检索或工作流验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using Ontologies in Failure Analysis
Fault analysis is a complex task that requires electrical engineers to perform various analyses to detect and localize a physical defect. The analysis process is very knowledge-intensive and must be precisely documented to report the issue to customers as well as to ensure the best possible reuse of the acquired experience in similar future analyses. However, writing unambiguous documentation can be complicated for many reasons, such as selecting details and results to be presented in a report, or the naming of terms and their definition. To avoid some of these issues, FA engineers must agree on a clearly defined terminology specifying methods, physical faults and their electrical signatures, tools, and relations between them. Moreover, to allow FA software systems to use this terminology, it must be stored in a format that can be interpreted similarly by both engineers and software. This paper presents an approach that solves these challenges by using an ontology describing FA-relevant terminology using a logic-based representation. The latter guarantees the same interpretation of the defined terms by engineers and software systems, which can use it to perform various tasks like text classification, information retrieval, or workflow verification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SCM Application and Failure Analysis Procedure for Ion-Implantation Issues in Power Devices Low Angle Annular Dark Field Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy Analysis of Phase Change Material Report Classification for Semiconductor Failure Analysis Application and Optimization of Automated ECCI Mapping to the Analysis of Lowly Defective Epitaxial Films on Blanket or Patterned Wafers Logo Classification and Data Augmentation Techniques for PCB Assurance and Counterfeit Detection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1