心电图左轴总偏差的解释。

European journal of cardiology Pub Date : 1979-10-01
H B Burchell, N Tuna
{"title":"心电图左轴总偏差的解释。","authors":"H B Burchell,&nbsp;N Tuna","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 94 patients with prominent left axis deviation, there was a marked disparity in the mean angles determined by the maximum magnitude of the deflections and that determined by areas. There was also considerable variation in the angle of the maximum vector in the frontal plane (frontal plane angle) and the angle of 50 msec vector in the frontal plane. Similar results were observed in 17 cases of ostium primum atrial septal defect. These differences contrasted with the findings in a normal group of 50 subjects where a close correlation was found. The initial vector was directed to the right in approximately 80% of normals and 60% of the patients with LAD indicative of conduction defects in the left anterior fascicular or its distal ramifications. We conclude that a rightward orientation of the 5--10 msec vector (i.e. causing a Q wave in lead 1) should not be required for diagnosis of left anterior fascicular block. The spatial orientation of the initial vector was always anterior in the control subjects. In these 'normals', as well as in the patients with left axis deviation, the initial vector varied markedly in its azimuth direction (right or left) when superiorly directed; but when inferiorly directed in the normal subjects it was virtually always directed rightward. From these data we were unable to construct rigid criteria which would reliably distinguish aberrant excitation patterns manifested by gross left axis deviation in the electrocardiograms of patients with established heart disease from subjects without defined heart disease. Old infarction patterns, anterior, inferior, and lateral were not obscured by the associated anterior fascicular block.</p>","PeriodicalId":72971,"journal":{"name":"European journal of cardiology","volume":"10 4","pages":"259-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1979-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The interpretation of gross left axis deviation in the electrocardiogram.\",\"authors\":\"H B Burchell,&nbsp;N Tuna\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In 94 patients with prominent left axis deviation, there was a marked disparity in the mean angles determined by the maximum magnitude of the deflections and that determined by areas. There was also considerable variation in the angle of the maximum vector in the frontal plane (frontal plane angle) and the angle of 50 msec vector in the frontal plane. Similar results were observed in 17 cases of ostium primum atrial septal defect. These differences contrasted with the findings in a normal group of 50 subjects where a close correlation was found. The initial vector was directed to the right in approximately 80% of normals and 60% of the patients with LAD indicative of conduction defects in the left anterior fascicular or its distal ramifications. We conclude that a rightward orientation of the 5--10 msec vector (i.e. causing a Q wave in lead 1) should not be required for diagnosis of left anterior fascicular block. The spatial orientation of the initial vector was always anterior in the control subjects. In these 'normals', as well as in the patients with left axis deviation, the initial vector varied markedly in its azimuth direction (right or left) when superiorly directed; but when inferiorly directed in the normal subjects it was virtually always directed rightward. From these data we were unable to construct rigid criteria which would reliably distinguish aberrant excitation patterns manifested by gross left axis deviation in the electrocardiograms of patients with established heart disease from subjects without defined heart disease. Old infarction patterns, anterior, inferior, and lateral were not obscured by the associated anterior fascicular block.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of cardiology\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"259-77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1979-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在94例左轴偏离明显的患者中,由最大偏移量决定的平均角度与由面积决定的平均角度存在明显差异。最大矢量在锋面的夹角(锋面角)和50msec矢量在锋面的夹角也有较大的变化。对17例原发性房间隔缺损患者进行了类似的治疗。这些差异与50名正常受试者的研究结果形成鲜明对比,后者发现了密切的相关性。大约80%的正常人和60%的LAD患者的初始矢量指向右侧,这表明左前肌束或其远端分支存在传导缺陷。我们的结论是,5- 10毫秒矢量的向右方向(即在导联1中引起Q波)不应该被诊断为左前束传导阻滞。在对照组中,初始向量的空间方向始终是前向的。在这些“法线”中,以及在左轴偏离的患者中,当向上定向时,初始矢量在其方位角方向(右或左)上明显变化;但在正常受试者中,当向下引导时,它实际上总是向右引导。从这些数据中,我们无法建立严格的标准来可靠地区分异常兴奋模式,这些异常兴奋模式表现为确定的心脏病患者的心电图左轴偏离与未确定的心脏病受试者。前、下、外侧的旧梗死模式未被相关的前束阻滞所掩盖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The interpretation of gross left axis deviation in the electrocardiogram.

In 94 patients with prominent left axis deviation, there was a marked disparity in the mean angles determined by the maximum magnitude of the deflections and that determined by areas. There was also considerable variation in the angle of the maximum vector in the frontal plane (frontal plane angle) and the angle of 50 msec vector in the frontal plane. Similar results were observed in 17 cases of ostium primum atrial septal defect. These differences contrasted with the findings in a normal group of 50 subjects where a close correlation was found. The initial vector was directed to the right in approximately 80% of normals and 60% of the patients with LAD indicative of conduction defects in the left anterior fascicular or its distal ramifications. We conclude that a rightward orientation of the 5--10 msec vector (i.e. causing a Q wave in lead 1) should not be required for diagnosis of left anterior fascicular block. The spatial orientation of the initial vector was always anterior in the control subjects. In these 'normals', as well as in the patients with left axis deviation, the initial vector varied markedly in its azimuth direction (right or left) when superiorly directed; but when inferiorly directed in the normal subjects it was virtually always directed rightward. From these data we were unable to construct rigid criteria which would reliably distinguish aberrant excitation patterns manifested by gross left axis deviation in the electrocardiograms of patients with established heart disease from subjects without defined heart disease. Old infarction patterns, anterior, inferior, and lateral were not obscured by the associated anterior fascicular block.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Plasma pancreatic polypeptide and gastrin in the assessment of autonomic activity in acute myocardial infarction. Effects of intrinsic sympathetic activity of beta-blockers on SA and AV nodes in man. Coronary arterial stenosis and subclavian steal in Takayasu's arteritis. Changes in 86-rubidium uptake in erythrocytes of digoxin-treated patients, in heart failure with sinus rhythm. Relationship to clinical effects. Digoxin in the elderly and in renal failure. Contribution of erythrocyte 86-rubidium uptake tests.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1