晶体管技术对单片3D集成电路节能的影响

S. Samal, D. Nayak, M. Ichihashi, S. Banna, S. Lim
{"title":"晶体管技术对单片3D集成电路节能的影响","authors":"S. Samal, D. Nayak, M. Ichihashi, S. Banna, S. Lim","doi":"10.1109/VLSI-TSA.2016.7480523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we discuss the impact of transistor technology on the power savings in monolithic 3D ICs over traditional 2D ICs. Our results are based on gate-level 3D IC partitioning and full RTL to GDSII design and analysis of a Low Density Parity Check (LDPC) benchmark circuit block with use of two different silicon validated foundry technologies. These two technologies have the same nominal operating voltage, but differ in terms of device performance, power, and gate capacitance. Our results show that monolithic 3D IC provides 37.5% more power savings for the technology with lower device power and input capacitance compared to that of a high power device technology.","PeriodicalId":441941,"journal":{"name":"2016 International Symposium on VLSI Technology, Systems and Application (VLSI-TSA)","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of transistor technology on power savings in monolithic 3D ICs\",\"authors\":\"S. Samal, D. Nayak, M. Ichihashi, S. Banna, S. Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/VLSI-TSA.2016.7480523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we discuss the impact of transistor technology on the power savings in monolithic 3D ICs over traditional 2D ICs. Our results are based on gate-level 3D IC partitioning and full RTL to GDSII design and analysis of a Low Density Parity Check (LDPC) benchmark circuit block with use of two different silicon validated foundry technologies. These two technologies have the same nominal operating voltage, but differ in terms of device performance, power, and gate capacitance. Our results show that monolithic 3D IC provides 37.5% more power savings for the technology with lower device power and input capacitance compared to that of a high power device technology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":441941,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 International Symposium on VLSI Technology, Systems and Application (VLSI-TSA)\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 International Symposium on VLSI Technology, Systems and Application (VLSI-TSA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/VLSI-TSA.2016.7480523\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 International Symposium on VLSI Technology, Systems and Application (VLSI-TSA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VLSI-TSA.2016.7480523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们讨论了晶体管技术对单片3D集成电路比传统2D集成电路节能的影响。我们的研究结果是基于门级3D IC划分和全RTL到GDSII设计和分析低密度奇偶校验(LDPC)基准电路块,使用两种不同的硅验证铸造技术。这两种技术具有相同的标称工作电压,但在器件性能、功率和栅极电容方面有所不同。我们的研究结果表明,与高功率器件技术相比,单片3D IC在更低的器件功率和输入电容下为该技术提供了37.5%的节能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of transistor technology on power savings in monolithic 3D ICs
In this paper, we discuss the impact of transistor technology on the power savings in monolithic 3D ICs over traditional 2D ICs. Our results are based on gate-level 3D IC partitioning and full RTL to GDSII design and analysis of a Low Density Parity Check (LDPC) benchmark circuit block with use of two different silicon validated foundry technologies. These two technologies have the same nominal operating voltage, but differ in terms of device performance, power, and gate capacitance. Our results show that monolithic 3D IC provides 37.5% more power savings for the technology with lower device power and input capacitance compared to that of a high power device technology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
RF performance of passive components on state-of-art trap rich silicon-on-insulator substrates Transient control of resistive random access memory for high speed and high endurance performance Advanced metrology and inspection solutions for a 3D world High-gain, low-voltage BEOL logic gate inverter built with film profile engineered IGZO transistors Oxygen chemical potential profile optimization for fast low current (<10μA) resistive switching in oxide-based RRAM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1