AUC估计的平滑样条:高斯数据的仿真研究

K. Promjiraprawat, W. Wongseree
{"title":"AUC估计的平滑样条:高斯数据的仿真研究","authors":"K. Promjiraprawat, W. Wongseree","doi":"10.1109/MITICON.2016.8025224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve has been employed in classification problems along with the area under the curve (AUC) as the performance indicator of classifiers. Both parametric and non-parametric methods have been widely used to estimate the ROC curve as well as the AUC. In this study, a smoothing spline is proposed in order to provide an alternative of the ROC curve and AUC estimate. A logistic regression is selected as a base classifier for simulation cases of Gaussian and mixture of Gaussian data. The smoothing spline, bi-normal model and empirical method are compared in terms of root mean square error (RMSE) from the true ROC curve and the bias from the true AUC. The results indicate that the ROC curve and its AUC obtained from smoothing spline can provide a trade-off between the parametric bi-normal model and non-parametric empirical method, with 1.4% of bias and 7.75 of RMSE, on average for a dichotomous classification.","PeriodicalId":127868,"journal":{"name":"2016 Management and Innovation Technology International Conference (MITicon)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Smoothing spline for the AUC estimate: Simulation studies in Gaussian data\",\"authors\":\"K. Promjiraprawat, W. Wongseree\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MITICON.2016.8025224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve has been employed in classification problems along with the area under the curve (AUC) as the performance indicator of classifiers. Both parametric and non-parametric methods have been widely used to estimate the ROC curve as well as the AUC. In this study, a smoothing spline is proposed in order to provide an alternative of the ROC curve and AUC estimate. A logistic regression is selected as a base classifier for simulation cases of Gaussian and mixture of Gaussian data. The smoothing spline, bi-normal model and empirical method are compared in terms of root mean square error (RMSE) from the true ROC curve and the bias from the true AUC. The results indicate that the ROC curve and its AUC obtained from smoothing spline can provide a trade-off between the parametric bi-normal model and non-parametric empirical method, with 1.4% of bias and 7.75 of RMSE, on average for a dichotomous classification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":127868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 Management and Innovation Technology International Conference (MITicon)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 Management and Innovation Technology International Conference (MITicon)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MITICON.2016.8025224\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Management and Innovation Technology International Conference (MITicon)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MITICON.2016.8025224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在分类问题中采用了受试者工作特征曲线(Receiver operating characteristic, ROC),曲线下面积(area under the curve, AUC)作为分类器的性能指标。参数和非参数方法都被广泛用于估计ROC曲线和AUC。在本研究中,为了提供ROC曲线和AUC估计的替代方法,提出了平滑样条。对于高斯和混合高斯数据的模拟情况,选择逻辑回归作为基分类器。比较了平滑样条、双正态模型和经验方法与真实ROC曲线的均方根误差(RMSE)和真实AUC的偏差。结果表明,由平滑样条获得的ROC曲线及其AUC可以在参数双正态模型和非参数经验方法之间进行权衡,对于二分类,平均偏差为1.4%,RMSE为7.75。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Smoothing spline for the AUC estimate: Simulation studies in Gaussian data
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve has been employed in classification problems along with the area under the curve (AUC) as the performance indicator of classifiers. Both parametric and non-parametric methods have been widely used to estimate the ROC curve as well as the AUC. In this study, a smoothing spline is proposed in order to provide an alternative of the ROC curve and AUC estimate. A logistic regression is selected as a base classifier for simulation cases of Gaussian and mixture of Gaussian data. The smoothing spline, bi-normal model and empirical method are compared in terms of root mean square error (RMSE) from the true ROC curve and the bias from the true AUC. The results indicate that the ROC curve and its AUC obtained from smoothing spline can provide a trade-off between the parametric bi-normal model and non-parametric empirical method, with 1.4% of bias and 7.75 of RMSE, on average for a dichotomous classification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Law for the promotion and protection of the right to education of students with disabilities in the university Defensive performance comparison of firewall systems Short-term biochemical oxygen demand (BODst) estimation using an oxygen uptake rate measurement method Rough-mutual feature selection based-on minimal-boundary and maximal-lower Comparative study of software clone detection techniques
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1