通过改进现有的测试:分析和工具来发展教师的评估素养

{"title":"通过改进现有的测试:分析和工具来发展教师的评估素养","authors":"","doi":"10.36078/987654511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present research paper attempts to provide an exemplary step-by-step description of the improvement and tailoring process of an existing assessment to provide practical guidelines to English teachers. The theories, tools, and techniques mentioned in the study are expected to serve as guidelines for teachers in their assessment literacy improvement paths. To make the guidelines more practical and self-explicatory to teachers/readers, this investigation deals with the modification of an existing assessment (quiz test) used in one of the English for Specific Courses (ESP) – Business English module for future logisticians, which is provided in the context of higher education (HE) institution – Inha University in Tashkent (IUT). The research aims to tailor the modern test (unit quiz) and make it meet the needs of a learner and the Common European Framework of References (CEFR) standards; principally, it also intends to ensure that the test responds to the five principles of assessment: reliability, practicality, validity, washback, and authenticity.\nThis case study covers the description of the study subject, analysis of a test used at schools the study subject attends, and its modified version. The implemented research methods involved qualitative and quantitative data collection tools such as pre- and post-interviews with the subject, pre- and post-tests, observation, and feedback. The result of this study which was scrutinized based on the piloting outcomes, showed that it was successfully polished and oriented to the topical learner profile at this HE institution. Besides, the test eventually meets the assessment principles because of the adjustments, which make it suitable for the CEFR standards.","PeriodicalId":161777,"journal":{"name":"Philology matters","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DEVELOPING TEACHERS’ ASSESSMENT LITERACY BY IMPROVING EXISTING TESTS: ANALYSES AND TOOLS\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.36078/987654511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present research paper attempts to provide an exemplary step-by-step description of the improvement and tailoring process of an existing assessment to provide practical guidelines to English teachers. The theories, tools, and techniques mentioned in the study are expected to serve as guidelines for teachers in their assessment literacy improvement paths. To make the guidelines more practical and self-explicatory to teachers/readers, this investigation deals with the modification of an existing assessment (quiz test) used in one of the English for Specific Courses (ESP) – Business English module for future logisticians, which is provided in the context of higher education (HE) institution – Inha University in Tashkent (IUT). The research aims to tailor the modern test (unit quiz) and make it meet the needs of a learner and the Common European Framework of References (CEFR) standards; principally, it also intends to ensure that the test responds to the five principles of assessment: reliability, practicality, validity, washback, and authenticity.\\nThis case study covers the description of the study subject, analysis of a test used at schools the study subject attends, and its modified version. The implemented research methods involved qualitative and quantitative data collection tools such as pre- and post-interviews with the subject, pre- and post-tests, observation, and feedback. The result of this study which was scrutinized based on the piloting outcomes, showed that it was successfully polished and oriented to the topical learner profile at this HE institution. Besides, the test eventually meets the assessment principles because of the adjustments, which make it suitable for the CEFR standards.\",\"PeriodicalId\":161777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philology matters\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philology matters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36078/987654511\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philology matters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36078/987654511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究论文试图提供一个示范性的逐步描述现有评估的改进和剪裁过程,为英语教师提供实用指导。本研究中所提及的理论、工具和技术,可望作为教师评估读写能力提升路径的指导。为了使指导方针对教师/读者更加实用和不言自明,本调查涉及对特定课程英语(ESP) -未来物流人员商务英语模块中使用的现有评估(测验测试)的修改,该测试是在塔什干的高等教育(HE)机构- Inha大学(IUT)提供的。该研究旨在定制现代测试(单元测验),使其满足学习者和欧洲共同参考框架(CEFR)标准的需求;主要地,它还打算确保测试响应五个评估原则:信度、实用性、效度、反拨性和真实性。本案例研究涵盖了研究对象的描述、研究对象所在学校使用的测试分析及其修改版本。实施的研究方法包括定性和定量数据收集工具,如对受试者进行前后访谈、前后测试、观察和反馈。这项研究的结果是在试点结果的基础上进行仔细审查的,结果表明,它成功地进行了润色,并面向该高等教育机构的主题学习者概况。此外,由于调整,该测试最终达到了评估原则,使其适合CEFR标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DEVELOPING TEACHERS’ ASSESSMENT LITERACY BY IMPROVING EXISTING TESTS: ANALYSES AND TOOLS
The present research paper attempts to provide an exemplary step-by-step description of the improvement and tailoring process of an existing assessment to provide practical guidelines to English teachers. The theories, tools, and techniques mentioned in the study are expected to serve as guidelines for teachers in their assessment literacy improvement paths. To make the guidelines more practical and self-explicatory to teachers/readers, this investigation deals with the modification of an existing assessment (quiz test) used in one of the English for Specific Courses (ESP) – Business English module for future logisticians, which is provided in the context of higher education (HE) institution – Inha University in Tashkent (IUT). The research aims to tailor the modern test (unit quiz) and make it meet the needs of a learner and the Common European Framework of References (CEFR) standards; principally, it also intends to ensure that the test responds to the five principles of assessment: reliability, practicality, validity, washback, and authenticity. This case study covers the description of the study subject, analysis of a test used at schools the study subject attends, and its modified version. The implemented research methods involved qualitative and quantitative data collection tools such as pre- and post-interviews with the subject, pre- and post-tests, observation, and feedback. The result of this study which was scrutinized based on the piloting outcomes, showed that it was successfully polished and oriented to the topical learner profile at this HE institution. Besides, the test eventually meets the assessment principles because of the adjustments, which make it suitable for the CEFR standards.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FORS VA DARIY TILLARIDA OTLARDA SON KATEGORIYASI EY UNDOVI MUROJAAT OBYEKTI SIFATIDA TRANSLATION PROBLEMS AND THEIR SOLUTIONS STAGES OF LEGAL DISCOURSE DEVELOPMENT IN LINGUISTICS COMPARATIVE-TYPOLOGICAL APPROACH TO THE STATUS OF SIMPLE AND COMPLEX SENTENCES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1