在互连制造过程中防止工艺引起的ESD损坏的设计解决方案

J. Ackaert, B. Greenwood
{"title":"在互连制造过程中防止工艺引起的ESD损坏的设计解决方案","authors":"J. Ackaert, B. Greenwood","doi":"10.1109/ICICDT.2010.5510285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ESD problems are commonly thought to be an electrostatic discharge event through the device pins. All known models like HBM, MM, CDM are based on this assumption. During assembly discharge into devices, directly into the surface is also well known. Pad – related, ESD protective structures are useless against this ESD-surface-discharge-path, called ESDFOS [1]. Little is known however on the impact of simple wafer cleaning/spraying as used frequently during the wafer manufacturing itself. In many cases these processes do include high risks of generating electrostatic charge; subsequent discharge into devices and can easily induce ESD-like events internally in the interconnect circuitry of a device. In this paper, charging induced damage (CID) into common metal interconnect is reported. The damage is caused by the build up of charges on a resist surface during a water rinsing step. This charging is inducing a mirror charge on the interconnect circuitry and results in a discharge through the inter metal dielectric layer (IMD) towards a grounded structure. This CID can lead to direct severe yield loss. In milder cases the damage is difficult to detect but is proven to result in reliability issues. The charging has been detected, measured and evaluated with the help of a non contact surface potential measurement. The phenomena has been characterized and quantified. This paper is describing the occurrence of the failures, the design of the test structures, the measurement results. This work is concluding on how a design can be made safe from ESDFOS during processing by applying the popper layout rules.","PeriodicalId":187361,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE International Conference on Integrated Circuit Design and Technology","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design solutions for preventing process induced ESD damage during manufacturing of interconnects\",\"authors\":\"J. Ackaert, B. Greenwood\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICICDT.2010.5510285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ESD problems are commonly thought to be an electrostatic discharge event through the device pins. All known models like HBM, MM, CDM are based on this assumption. During assembly discharge into devices, directly into the surface is also well known. Pad – related, ESD protective structures are useless against this ESD-surface-discharge-path, called ESDFOS [1]. Little is known however on the impact of simple wafer cleaning/spraying as used frequently during the wafer manufacturing itself. In many cases these processes do include high risks of generating electrostatic charge; subsequent discharge into devices and can easily induce ESD-like events internally in the interconnect circuitry of a device. In this paper, charging induced damage (CID) into common metal interconnect is reported. The damage is caused by the build up of charges on a resist surface during a water rinsing step. This charging is inducing a mirror charge on the interconnect circuitry and results in a discharge through the inter metal dielectric layer (IMD) towards a grounded structure. This CID can lead to direct severe yield loss. In milder cases the damage is difficult to detect but is proven to result in reliability issues. The charging has been detected, measured and evaluated with the help of a non contact surface potential measurement. The phenomena has been characterized and quantified. This paper is describing the occurrence of the failures, the design of the test structures, the measurement results. This work is concluding on how a design can be made safe from ESDFOS during processing by applying the popper layout rules.\",\"PeriodicalId\":187361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 IEEE International Conference on Integrated Circuit Design and Technology\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 IEEE International Conference on Integrated Circuit Design and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICDT.2010.5510285\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE International Conference on Integrated Circuit Design and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICDT.2010.5510285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

ESD问题通常被认为是通过器件引脚的静电放电事件。所有已知的模型,如HBM、MM、CDM都是基于这个假设。在装配过程中,直接进入设备表面也是众所周知的。与焊盘相关的ESD保护结构对这种称为ESDFOS[1]的ESD表面放电路径不起作用。然而,在晶圆制造过程中经常使用的简单晶圆清洗/喷涂的影响却鲜为人知。在许多情况下,这些过程确实存在产生静电电荷的高风险;随后的放电进入设备,并且可以很容易地在设备的互连电路内部诱发类似esd的事件。本文报道了普通金属互连线的充电诱发损伤问题。这种损坏是由于在水冲洗过程中在抗蚀剂表面积聚电荷造成的。这种充电在互连电路上诱导镜像电荷,并导致通过金属间介电层(IMD)向接地结构放电。这种CID会直接导致严重的产量损失。在较轻微的情况下,损坏很难检测到,但已证明会导致可靠性问题。利用非接触面电位测量方法对充电过程进行了检测、测量和评价。这种现象已经被描述和量化了。本文介绍了故障的发生、试验结构的设计和测量结果。这项工作总结了如何通过应用popper布局规则使设计在处理过程中免受ESDFOS的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Design solutions for preventing process induced ESD damage during manufacturing of interconnects
ESD problems are commonly thought to be an electrostatic discharge event through the device pins. All known models like HBM, MM, CDM are based on this assumption. During assembly discharge into devices, directly into the surface is also well known. Pad – related, ESD protective structures are useless against this ESD-surface-discharge-path, called ESDFOS [1]. Little is known however on the impact of simple wafer cleaning/spraying as used frequently during the wafer manufacturing itself. In many cases these processes do include high risks of generating electrostatic charge; subsequent discharge into devices and can easily induce ESD-like events internally in the interconnect circuitry of a device. In this paper, charging induced damage (CID) into common metal interconnect is reported. The damage is caused by the build up of charges on a resist surface during a water rinsing step. This charging is inducing a mirror charge on the interconnect circuitry and results in a discharge through the inter metal dielectric layer (IMD) towards a grounded structure. This CID can lead to direct severe yield loss. In milder cases the damage is difficult to detect but is proven to result in reliability issues. The charging has been detected, measured and evaluated with the help of a non contact surface potential measurement. The phenomena has been characterized and quantified. This paper is describing the occurrence of the failures, the design of the test structures, the measurement results. This work is concluding on how a design can be made safe from ESDFOS during processing by applying the popper layout rules.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improvement of integrated dipole antenna performance using diamond for intra-chip wireless interconnection MAGALI: A Network-on-Chip based multi-core system-on-chip for MIMO 4G SDR A new method for performance control of a differential active inductor for low power 2.4GHz applications Power switch optimization and sizing in 65nm PD-SOI considering supply voltage noise Emerging screen technologies impact on application engine IC power
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1