Shinagaku与日本汉学的现代化

S. Guex
{"title":"Shinagaku与日本汉学的现代化","authors":"S. Guex","doi":"10.1515/ASIA-2014-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the Meiji period, traditional Chinese learning (kangaku) in Japan went through a reorganization process under the influence of Western modern structures of knowledge that led to the establishment of a new discipline close to Western-style sinology. The Imperial University of Tokyo and the Imperial University of Kyoto both played an important role in this process. The former is often described as defending a more traditionalist view of Chinese studies whereas the latter is associated with Shinagaku, name of the supposedly Western oriented Kyoto school of Sinology. This paper examines the validity of this common understanding through the analysis of some of the “fathers” of Shinagaku. Samuel Guex: Université de Genève. E-mail: Samuel.Guex@unige.ch","PeriodicalId":286658,"journal":{"name":"Asiatische Studien – Études Asiatiques","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Le Shinagaku et la modernisation de la sinologie japonaise\",\"authors\":\"S. Guex\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/ASIA-2014-0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During the Meiji period, traditional Chinese learning (kangaku) in Japan went through a reorganization process under the influence of Western modern structures of knowledge that led to the establishment of a new discipline close to Western-style sinology. The Imperial University of Tokyo and the Imperial University of Kyoto both played an important role in this process. The former is often described as defending a more traditionalist view of Chinese studies whereas the latter is associated with Shinagaku, name of the supposedly Western oriented Kyoto school of Sinology. This paper examines the validity of this common understanding through the analysis of some of the “fathers” of Shinagaku. Samuel Guex: Université de Genève. E-mail: Samuel.Guex@unige.ch\",\"PeriodicalId\":286658,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asiatische Studien – Études Asiatiques\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asiatische Studien – Études Asiatiques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/ASIA-2014-0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asiatische Studien – Études Asiatiques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ASIA-2014-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

明治时期,日本的传统汉学在西方现代知识结构的影响下经历了一个重组过程,导致了一门接近西式汉学的新学科的建立。东京帝国大学和京都帝国大学在这一过程中都发挥了重要作用。前者通常被描述为捍卫更传统的中国研究观点,而后者则与Shinagaku有关,该名称被认为是西方导向的京都汉学学派。本文通过对一些“父”的分析来检验这一共识的有效性。Samuel Guex: gen大学。电子邮件:Samuel.Guex@unige.ch
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Le Shinagaku et la modernisation de la sinologie japonaise
During the Meiji period, traditional Chinese learning (kangaku) in Japan went through a reorganization process under the influence of Western modern structures of knowledge that led to the establishment of a new discipline close to Western-style sinology. The Imperial University of Tokyo and the Imperial University of Kyoto both played an important role in this process. The former is often described as defending a more traditionalist view of Chinese studies whereas the latter is associated with Shinagaku, name of the supposedly Western oriented Kyoto school of Sinology. This paper examines the validity of this common understanding through the analysis of some of the “fathers” of Shinagaku. Samuel Guex: Université de Genève. E-mail: Samuel.Guex@unige.ch
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
„Wissen‟ und „glauben‟ als Gegensatzpaar im politischen Diskurs Japans zwischen 1812 und 1911 Rezensionen – Comptes rendus – Reviews Anzan Kigan. Rituelle Geburtspraktiken Japans im Wandel der Zeit Wer schützt wen? Hachimanismus, Buddhismus und Tennōismus im Altertum What is “rhetoric” anyway? Briared in words in Early China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1