结构比较、转移与不平等权力关系:作为概念和方法论工具的场理论

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE Comparative Critical Studies Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.3366/ccs.2023.0482
Gisèle Sapiro
{"title":"结构比较、转移与不平等权力关系:作为概念和方法论工具的场理论","authors":"Gisèle Sapiro","doi":"10.3366/ccs.2023.0482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes a comparative approach theoretically and methodologically based in the sociology of literature, and more specifically on field theory, which takes into account circulation and transfers, as well as international power relations between centers and peripheries. As developed in the first section, this approach combines Bourdieu's field theory, Casanova's analysis of the world republic of letters, Even-Zohar's polysystem theory, Moretti's quantitative methods, and the author's own work on the circulation of literary texts and forms. Exemplified by case studies borrowed from the existing literature (including the author's research), the methodological framework developed in the following sections addresses authorities (publishers, prizes, festivals) and writer's strategies.","PeriodicalId":42644,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Critical Studies","volume":"208 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structural Comparison, Transfers and Unequal Power Relations: Field Theory as a Conceptual and Methodological Tool\",\"authors\":\"Gisèle Sapiro\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/ccs.2023.0482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper proposes a comparative approach theoretically and methodologically based in the sociology of literature, and more specifically on field theory, which takes into account circulation and transfers, as well as international power relations between centers and peripheries. As developed in the first section, this approach combines Bourdieu's field theory, Casanova's analysis of the world republic of letters, Even-Zohar's polysystem theory, Moretti's quantitative methods, and the author's own work on the circulation of literary texts and forms. Exemplified by case studies borrowed from the existing literature (including the author's research), the methodological framework developed in the following sections addresses authorities (publishers, prizes, festivals) and writer's strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Critical Studies\",\"volume\":\"208 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Critical Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/ccs.2023.0482\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Critical Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/ccs.2023.0482","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文在理论和方法上提出了一种基于文学社会学的比较方法,更具体地说,是基于场理论,它考虑了流通和转移,以及中心和边缘之间的国际权力关系。如第一节所述,这一方法结合了布迪厄的场理论、卡萨诺瓦对世界文学共和国的分析、埃文-佐哈尔的多系统理论、莫雷蒂的定量方法以及作者自己对文学文本和形式循环的研究。通过从现有文献(包括作者的研究)中借鉴的案例研究,以下章节中开发的方法框架解决了权威(出版商,奖项,节日)和作家的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Structural Comparison, Transfers and Unequal Power Relations: Field Theory as a Conceptual and Methodological Tool
This paper proposes a comparative approach theoretically and methodologically based in the sociology of literature, and more specifically on field theory, which takes into account circulation and transfers, as well as international power relations between centers and peripheries. As developed in the first section, this approach combines Bourdieu's field theory, Casanova's analysis of the world republic of letters, Even-Zohar's polysystem theory, Moretti's quantitative methods, and the author's own work on the circulation of literary texts and forms. Exemplified by case studies borrowed from the existing literature (including the author's research), the methodological framework developed in the following sections addresses authorities (publishers, prizes, festivals) and writer's strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Comparing Translations of Dante’s Commedia Pasolini and Minor Comparativism: Transnationalizing Dialect Poetry Structural Comparison, Transfers and Unequal Power Relations: Field Theory as a Conceptual and Methodological Tool Decolonizing Comparative Literature Comp Lit’s Other Half: In Defense of Literature, with Lao She
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1