牧场适应气候变化的社会层面:系统文献综述

IF 4.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Climatic Change Pub Date : 2023-12-14 DOI:10.1007/s10584-023-03648-4
Ada P. Smith, Sechindra Vallury, Elizabeth Covelli Metcalf
{"title":"牧场适应气候变化的社会层面:系统文献综述","authors":"Ada P. Smith, Sechindra Vallury, Elizabeth Covelli Metcalf","doi":"10.1007/s10584-023-03648-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rangeland social-ecological systems (SESs), which make up vast tracts of Earth’s terrestrial surface, are facing unprecedented change—from climate change and vegetation transitions to large-scale shifts in human land use and changing social and economic conditions. Understanding how people who manage and depend on rangeland resources are adapting to change has been the focus of a rapidly growing body of research, which has the potential to provide important insights for climate change adaptation policy and practice. Here, we use quantitative, qualitative, and bibliometric analyses to systematically review the scope, methods, and findings of 56 studies that examine the social dimensions of adaptation in rangeland SESs. Our review focuses on studies within the climate adaptation, adaptive capacity, and adaptive decision-making sub-fields, finding that this body of research is highly diverse in its disciplinary roots and theoretical origins, and therefore uses a wide range of frameworks and indicators to evaluate adaptation processes. Bibliometric analyses revealed that the field is fragmented into distinct scholarly communities that use either adaptive capacity or adaptive decision-making frameworks, with a lack of cross-field citation. Given the strengths (and weaknesses) inherent in each sub-field, this review suggests that greater cross-pollination across the scholarship could lead to new insights, particularly for capturing cross-scale interactions related to adaptation on rangelands. Results also showed that a majority of studies that examine adaptation in either “ranching” or “rangeland” systems are geographically concentrated in few, high-income countries (i.e., USA, Australia, China), demonstrating a need to extend future research efforts to understudied regions of the globe with rangeland-based livelihoods. Finally, our review highlights the need for more translational rangeland science, where policy- and practice-relevant frameworks evaluating adaptation in rangeland SESs might be developed by co-producing research working with rangeland communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":10372,"journal":{"name":"Climatic Change","volume":"410 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social dimensions of adaptation to climate change in rangelands: a systematic literature review\",\"authors\":\"Ada P. Smith, Sechindra Vallury, Elizabeth Covelli Metcalf\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10584-023-03648-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Rangeland social-ecological systems (SESs), which make up vast tracts of Earth’s terrestrial surface, are facing unprecedented change—from climate change and vegetation transitions to large-scale shifts in human land use and changing social and economic conditions. Understanding how people who manage and depend on rangeland resources are adapting to change has been the focus of a rapidly growing body of research, which has the potential to provide important insights for climate change adaptation policy and practice. Here, we use quantitative, qualitative, and bibliometric analyses to systematically review the scope, methods, and findings of 56 studies that examine the social dimensions of adaptation in rangeland SESs. Our review focuses on studies within the climate adaptation, adaptive capacity, and adaptive decision-making sub-fields, finding that this body of research is highly diverse in its disciplinary roots and theoretical origins, and therefore uses a wide range of frameworks and indicators to evaluate adaptation processes. Bibliometric analyses revealed that the field is fragmented into distinct scholarly communities that use either adaptive capacity or adaptive decision-making frameworks, with a lack of cross-field citation. Given the strengths (and weaknesses) inherent in each sub-field, this review suggests that greater cross-pollination across the scholarship could lead to new insights, particularly for capturing cross-scale interactions related to adaptation on rangelands. Results also showed that a majority of studies that examine adaptation in either “ranching” or “rangeland” systems are geographically concentrated in few, high-income countries (i.e., USA, Australia, China), demonstrating a need to extend future research efforts to understudied regions of the globe with rangeland-based livelihoods. Finally, our review highlights the need for more translational rangeland science, where policy- and practice-relevant frameworks evaluating adaptation in rangeland SESs might be developed by co-producing research working with rangeland communities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Climatic Change\",\"volume\":\"410 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Climatic Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-023-03648-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climatic Change","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-023-03648-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

占地球陆地表面大片面积的牧场社会生态系统(SES)正面临着前所未有的变化--从气候变化和植被过渡到人类土地利用的大规模转变以及不断变化的社会和经济条件。了解管理和依赖牧场资源的人们如何适应变化一直是快速增长的研究重点,这些研究有可能为气候变化适应政策和实践提供重要启示。在此,我们采用定量、定性和文献计量学分析方法,系统回顾了 56 项研究的范围、方法和结果,这些研究探讨了牧场社会经济系统中适应气候变化的社会层面。我们的综述侧重于气候适应、适应能力和适应性决策等子领域的研究,发现这些研究在学科根基和理论渊源上高度多样化,因此使用了多种框架和指标来评估适应过程。文献计量分析表明,该领域被分割成使用适应能力或适应决策框架的不同学术团体,缺乏跨领域引用。鉴于每个子领域固有的优势(和劣势),本综述认为,加强学术界之间的相互交流可带来新的见解,尤其是在捕捉牧场适应的跨尺度互动方面。研究结果还显示,大多数研究都集中在少数几个高收入国家(如美国、澳大利亚、中国),这表明今后有必要将研究工作扩展到全球以牧场为生的未被充分研究的地区。最后,我们的综述强调需要更多的牧场转化科学,通过与牧场社区共同开展研究,制定与政策和实践相关的框架,评估牧场生态系统服务环境的适应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Social dimensions of adaptation to climate change in rangelands: a systematic literature review

Rangeland social-ecological systems (SESs), which make up vast tracts of Earth’s terrestrial surface, are facing unprecedented change—from climate change and vegetation transitions to large-scale shifts in human land use and changing social and economic conditions. Understanding how people who manage and depend on rangeland resources are adapting to change has been the focus of a rapidly growing body of research, which has the potential to provide important insights for climate change adaptation policy and practice. Here, we use quantitative, qualitative, and bibliometric analyses to systematically review the scope, methods, and findings of 56 studies that examine the social dimensions of adaptation in rangeland SESs. Our review focuses on studies within the climate adaptation, adaptive capacity, and adaptive decision-making sub-fields, finding that this body of research is highly diverse in its disciplinary roots and theoretical origins, and therefore uses a wide range of frameworks and indicators to evaluate adaptation processes. Bibliometric analyses revealed that the field is fragmented into distinct scholarly communities that use either adaptive capacity or adaptive decision-making frameworks, with a lack of cross-field citation. Given the strengths (and weaknesses) inherent in each sub-field, this review suggests that greater cross-pollination across the scholarship could lead to new insights, particularly for capturing cross-scale interactions related to adaptation on rangelands. Results also showed that a majority of studies that examine adaptation in either “ranching” or “rangeland” systems are geographically concentrated in few, high-income countries (i.e., USA, Australia, China), demonstrating a need to extend future research efforts to understudied regions of the globe with rangeland-based livelihoods. Finally, our review highlights the need for more translational rangeland science, where policy- and practice-relevant frameworks evaluating adaptation in rangeland SESs might be developed by co-producing research working with rangeland communities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Climatic Change
Climatic Change 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
4.20%
发文量
180
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Climatic Change is dedicated to the totality of the problem of climatic variability and change - its descriptions, causes, implications and interactions among these. The purpose of the journal is to provide a means of exchange among those working in different disciplines on problems related to climatic variations. This means that authors have an opportunity to communicate the essence of their studies to people in other climate-related disciplines and to interested non-disciplinarians, as well as to report on research in which the originality is in the combinations of (not necessarily original) work from several disciplines. The journal also includes vigorous editorial and book review sections.
期刊最新文献
Natural resource management and green technological innovation impact on health risks and social development: Evidence from advanced economies Green industrial policy for climate action in the basic materials industry Amplification of compound hot-dry extremes and associated population exposure over East Africa Raising the bar: What determines the ambition level of corporate climate targets? A 561-yr (1461-2022 CE) summer temperature reconstruction for Mid-Atlantic-Northeast USA shows connections to volcanic forcing and atmospheric circulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1