企业持有不同的市场信念:信息流、利润表现和渠道结构

IF 6.7 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Omega-international Journal of Management Science Pub Date : 2024-03-02 DOI:10.1016/j.omega.2024.103065
Li Jiang , Zhongyuan Hao
{"title":"企业持有不同的市场信念:信息流、利润表现和渠道结构","authors":"Li Jiang ,&nbsp;Zhongyuan Hao","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2024.103065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We investigate the impact of diverse market beliefs held by supply chain firms on information flow and channel efficiency. In presentative settings, suppliers sell substitutable products through retailers to a market with uncertain demand and market competition is in quantity. Structure <span><math><mi>B</mi></math></span> comprises a monopolistic supplier and a monopolistic retailer. With respect to structure <span><math><mi>B</mi></math></span>, structure <span><math><mi>U</mi></math></span> includes competition between suppliers, structure <span><math><mi>D</mi></math></span> includes competition between retailers, while structure <span><math><mrow><mi>S</mi><mi>C</mi></mrow></math></span> includes competition between two supply chains. A retailer has access to a demand signal useful for updating the forecast of market uncertainty. A supplier has no signal access but can offer a payment to a retailer, who decides whether to accept the payment and disclose signal to the supplier, termed information sharing. Suppliers and retailers hold diverse beliefs about market conditions. Knowing each other's market beliefs influences firms’ ex-post operations policies and ex-ante profit perception. We demonstrate that holding diverse beliefs about market uncertainty by firms facilitates information sharing except in the presence of only retailer competition, in which case it deters information sharing. Exchanging market beliefs about market uncertainty among firms strengthens their incentive to engage in information sharing, but it exerts mixed effects on their actual profits. By comparison, suppliers and retailers are more likely to benefit from exchanging market beliefs about market size, although it is inconsequential to information sharing. Moreover, we pinpoint the impacts of holding diverse market beliefs by firms on their relative performances across channel structures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Holding diverse market beliefs by firms: Information flow, profit performances, and channel structure\",\"authors\":\"Li Jiang ,&nbsp;Zhongyuan Hao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.omega.2024.103065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We investigate the impact of diverse market beliefs held by supply chain firms on information flow and channel efficiency. In presentative settings, suppliers sell substitutable products through retailers to a market with uncertain demand and market competition is in quantity. Structure <span><math><mi>B</mi></math></span> comprises a monopolistic supplier and a monopolistic retailer. With respect to structure <span><math><mi>B</mi></math></span>, structure <span><math><mi>U</mi></math></span> includes competition between suppliers, structure <span><math><mi>D</mi></math></span> includes competition between retailers, while structure <span><math><mrow><mi>S</mi><mi>C</mi></mrow></math></span> includes competition between two supply chains. A retailer has access to a demand signal useful for updating the forecast of market uncertainty. A supplier has no signal access but can offer a payment to a retailer, who decides whether to accept the payment and disclose signal to the supplier, termed information sharing. Suppliers and retailers hold diverse beliefs about market conditions. Knowing each other's market beliefs influences firms’ ex-post operations policies and ex-ante profit perception. We demonstrate that holding diverse beliefs about market uncertainty by firms facilitates information sharing except in the presence of only retailer competition, in which case it deters information sharing. Exchanging market beliefs about market uncertainty among firms strengthens their incentive to engage in information sharing, but it exerts mixed effects on their actual profits. By comparison, suppliers and retailers are more likely to benefit from exchanging market beliefs about market size, although it is inconsequential to information sharing. Moreover, we pinpoint the impacts of holding diverse market beliefs by firms on their relative performances across channel structures.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Omega-international Journal of Management Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Omega-international Journal of Management Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030504832400032X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030504832400032X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了供应链企业持有的不同市场信念对信息流和渠道效率的影响。在现时环境下,供应商通过零售商向需求不确定的市场销售可替代产品,市场竞争是数量竞争。结构 B 由垄断供应商和垄断零售商组成。对于结构 B,结构 U 包括供应商之间的竞争,结构 D 包括零售商之间的竞争,而结构 SC 包括两条供应链之间的竞争。零售商可以获取需求信号,用于更新对市场不确定性的预测。供应商无法获得信号,但可以向零售商付款,由零售商决定是否接受付款并向供应商披露信号,这被称为信息共享。供应商和零售商对市场条件持有不同的看法。对彼此市场信念的了解会影响企业的事后运营政策和事前利润认知。我们证明,企业对市场不确定性持有不同看法会促进信息共享,但如果只有零售商竞争,则会阻碍信息共享。企业之间交换有关市场不确定性的市场信念会增强企业参与信息共享的动力,但对企业实际利润的影响则好坏参半。相比之下,供应商和零售商更有可能从交换有关市场规模的市场信念中获益,尽管这对信息共享来说无足轻重。此外,我们还指出了企业持有不同市场信念对其在不同渠道结构中相对表现的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Holding diverse market beliefs by firms: Information flow, profit performances, and channel structure

We investigate the impact of diverse market beliefs held by supply chain firms on information flow and channel efficiency. In presentative settings, suppliers sell substitutable products through retailers to a market with uncertain demand and market competition is in quantity. Structure B comprises a monopolistic supplier and a monopolistic retailer. With respect to structure B, structure U includes competition between suppliers, structure D includes competition between retailers, while structure SC includes competition between two supply chains. A retailer has access to a demand signal useful for updating the forecast of market uncertainty. A supplier has no signal access but can offer a payment to a retailer, who decides whether to accept the payment and disclose signal to the supplier, termed information sharing. Suppliers and retailers hold diverse beliefs about market conditions. Knowing each other's market beliefs influences firms’ ex-post operations policies and ex-ante profit perception. We demonstrate that holding diverse beliefs about market uncertainty by firms facilitates information sharing except in the presence of only retailer competition, in which case it deters information sharing. Exchanging market beliefs about market uncertainty among firms strengthens their incentive to engage in information sharing, but it exerts mixed effects on their actual profits. By comparison, suppliers and retailers are more likely to benefit from exchanging market beliefs about market size, although it is inconsequential to information sharing. Moreover, we pinpoint the impacts of holding diverse market beliefs by firms on their relative performances across channel structures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Omega-international Journal of Management Science
Omega-international Journal of Management Science 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
11.60%
发文量
130
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Unravelling the carbon emissions compliance in sustainable supply chains: The impacts of carbon audit cooperation How groups manage conflict when using model-driven decision support: An epistemic motivation lens Data-driven prioritization strategies for inventory rebalancing in bike-sharing systems Capacitated Mobile Facility Location Problem with Mobile Demand: Efficient relief aid provision to en route refugees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1