非洲的二氧化碳清除和净零排放:基于三种不同陆基负排放解决方案的综合评估建模

J. Ampah, Sandylove Afrane, H. Adun, Michael Dioha, E. Agyekum, A. A. Yusuf, Mudassar Naseer, O. Bamisile
{"title":"非洲的二氧化碳清除和净零排放:基于三种不同陆基负排放解决方案的综合评估建模","authors":"J. Ampah, Sandylove Afrane, H. Adun, Michael Dioha, E. Agyekum, A. A. Yusuf, Mudassar Naseer, O. Bamisile","doi":"10.1088/1748-9326/ad5dcf","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n As the remaining carbon budget for limiting warming to 1.5°C rapidly diminishes, it is clear that, besides decarbonization, the world must remove gigatonnes of CO2 from the atmosphere. Yet, Africa, where many carbon removal schemes are planned, remains a \"blindspot\" in existing studies. There is limited understanding of the trade-offs and synergies associated with carbon removal within Africa’s energy-land-water system. To address this research gap, we model a stylized net-zero emissions (NZE) in Africa by 2050, with focus on three land-based biological carbon removal approaches: afforestation/reforestation (AR), bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), and biochar. We find that by 2050, the total gross carbon removal is projected to reach 1.2 GtCO2/yr when all three carbon removal approaches are available, and 0.5 GtCO2/yr when Africa relies solely on AR. Pursuing NZE with only AR or AR alongside biochar in Africa would be the most expensive mitigation option and would lead to the lowest fossil fuel and industry CO2 emissions and CO2 removal. An NZE by 2050 in Africa could reduce cropland by 30-90% from 2020 to 2050, depending on the CDR deployment strategy adopted. Southern Africa would be particularly affected, facing significant challenges in balancing food security with climate goals. The highest increase in staple food prices will occur under AR only, while the availability of AR-BECCS-biochar produces the lowest rise in staple food prices. Our findings highlight the need for balanced and region-specific carbon dioxide removal strategies to ensure climate and other sustainability goals are met.","PeriodicalId":507917,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbon dioxide removal and net zero emissions in Africa: An integrated assessment modelling based on three different land-based negative emission solutions\",\"authors\":\"J. Ampah, Sandylove Afrane, H. Adun, Michael Dioha, E. Agyekum, A. A. Yusuf, Mudassar Naseer, O. Bamisile\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1748-9326/ad5dcf\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n As the remaining carbon budget for limiting warming to 1.5°C rapidly diminishes, it is clear that, besides decarbonization, the world must remove gigatonnes of CO2 from the atmosphere. Yet, Africa, where many carbon removal schemes are planned, remains a \\\"blindspot\\\" in existing studies. There is limited understanding of the trade-offs and synergies associated with carbon removal within Africa’s energy-land-water system. To address this research gap, we model a stylized net-zero emissions (NZE) in Africa by 2050, with focus on three land-based biological carbon removal approaches: afforestation/reforestation (AR), bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), and biochar. We find that by 2050, the total gross carbon removal is projected to reach 1.2 GtCO2/yr when all three carbon removal approaches are available, and 0.5 GtCO2/yr when Africa relies solely on AR. Pursuing NZE with only AR or AR alongside biochar in Africa would be the most expensive mitigation option and would lead to the lowest fossil fuel and industry CO2 emissions and CO2 removal. An NZE by 2050 in Africa could reduce cropland by 30-90% from 2020 to 2050, depending on the CDR deployment strategy adopted. Southern Africa would be particularly affected, facing significant challenges in balancing food security with climate goals. The highest increase in staple food prices will occur under AR only, while the availability of AR-BECCS-biochar produces the lowest rise in staple food prices. Our findings highlight the need for balanced and region-specific carbon dioxide removal strategies to ensure climate and other sustainability goals are met.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Research Letters\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Research Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad5dcf\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad5dcf","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着将升温限制在 1.5°C 的剩余碳预算迅速减少,很明显,除了去碳化,世界还必须从大气中清除千兆吨二氧化碳。然而,非洲作为许多碳清除计划的规划地,仍然是现有研究的 "盲点"。人们对非洲能源-土地-水系统中与碳清除相关的权衡和协同作用了解有限。为了弥补这一研究空白,我们建立了一个到 2050 年非洲风格化净零排放(NZE)模型,重点关注三种陆基生物碳清除方法:造林/再造林(AR)、碳捕集与封存生物能源(BECCS)和生物炭。我们发现,到 2050 年,当所有三种碳清除方法都可用时,总碳清除量预计将达到 1.2 GtCO2/yr,而当非洲仅依靠 AR 时,总碳清除量预计将达到 0.5 GtCO2/yr。在非洲仅使用 AR 或 AR 与生物炭同时使用的 NZE 将是最昂贵的减排方案,但其化石燃料和工业的二氧化碳排放量和二氧化碳去除量将最低。到 2050 年,非洲的 NZE 可使耕地面积从 2020 年到 2050 年减少 30-90%,这取决于所采用的 CDR 部署战略。南部非洲受到的影响尤为严重,在平衡粮食安全与气候目标方面面临巨大挑战。仅在 AR 条件下,主食价格的涨幅最高,而在提供 AR-BECCS 生物碳的条件下,主食价格的涨幅最低。我们的研究结果突出表明,有必要制定平衡的、针对具体地区的二氧化碳清除战略,以确保实现气候目标和其他可持续发展目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Carbon dioxide removal and net zero emissions in Africa: An integrated assessment modelling based on three different land-based negative emission solutions
As the remaining carbon budget for limiting warming to 1.5°C rapidly diminishes, it is clear that, besides decarbonization, the world must remove gigatonnes of CO2 from the atmosphere. Yet, Africa, where many carbon removal schemes are planned, remains a "blindspot" in existing studies. There is limited understanding of the trade-offs and synergies associated with carbon removal within Africa’s energy-land-water system. To address this research gap, we model a stylized net-zero emissions (NZE) in Africa by 2050, with focus on three land-based biological carbon removal approaches: afforestation/reforestation (AR), bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), and biochar. We find that by 2050, the total gross carbon removal is projected to reach 1.2 GtCO2/yr when all three carbon removal approaches are available, and 0.5 GtCO2/yr when Africa relies solely on AR. Pursuing NZE with only AR or AR alongside biochar in Africa would be the most expensive mitigation option and would lead to the lowest fossil fuel and industry CO2 emissions and CO2 removal. An NZE by 2050 in Africa could reduce cropland by 30-90% from 2020 to 2050, depending on the CDR deployment strategy adopted. Southern Africa would be particularly affected, facing significant challenges in balancing food security with climate goals. The highest increase in staple food prices will occur under AR only, while the availability of AR-BECCS-biochar produces the lowest rise in staple food prices. Our findings highlight the need for balanced and region-specific carbon dioxide removal strategies to ensure climate and other sustainability goals are met.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Responsible carbon dioxide removals and the EU’s 2040 climate target State-of-the-art bias correction of climate models misrepresent climate science and misinform adaptation Conceptualising global cultural transformation – Developing deep institutional scenarios for whole of society change Reliability and resilience of environmental flows under uncertainty: reconsidering water year types and inconsistent flow requirements in California Unequal economic consequences of coastal hazards: Hurricane impacts on North Carolina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1