Xiao-Fei Li, Ping Wang, Xiu-Li Tian, Nan Dong, Long Li
{"title":"玉米/蚕豆间作与接种的氮素利用互补性","authors":"Xiao-Fei Li, Ping Wang, Xiu-Li Tian, Nan Dong, Long Li","doi":"10.1007/s11104-024-06950-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background and aims</h3><p>Intercropping with legumes is beneficial for crop nitrogen (N) uptake, but the mechanism behind efficient N uptake in intercropping is not well understood. Therefore, this study aimed to measure the effect of crop diversity on N uptake in intercrop and to assess the mechanisms contributing to diversity effects.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>The N uptake on equivalent area basis was determined during 2012 to 2014 using a long-term experiment established in 2009 including faba bean/maize intercropping and corresponding monocultures. Complementarity effects (CE) and selection effects (SE) were calculated to assess N complementarity/facilitation and dominant species effects.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Faba bean/maize intercropping had 17.6% greater system N uptake than weighted means of two monocultures. The fertilizer-N rate required to achieve the maximum total N uptake was 300 kg N ha<sup>–1</sup> without inoculation and was 225 kg N ha<sup>–1</sup> with inoculation. Similar results were observed for biological N fixation of faba bean. Enhanced N uptake from intercropping compared with monoculture was strongly and positively correlated with the CE, but not correlated with the SE. In addition, N fixation accounted for approximately 20% of the positive CE in faba bean/maize intercropping.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>N complementarity and/or facilitation drove the increased N uptake in faba bean/maize intercropping. The results highlight the role of applying microbial inoculants to increase crop N uptake while reducing reliance on fertilizer N especially in newly reclaimed desert soils, and may also be useful for guiding the design of intercropping systems with complementary traits for efficient N use.</p>","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complementarity for nitrogen use in maize/faba bean intercropping with inoculation\",\"authors\":\"Xiao-Fei Li, Ping Wang, Xiu-Li Tian, Nan Dong, Long Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11104-024-06950-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background and aims</h3><p>Intercropping with legumes is beneficial for crop nitrogen (N) uptake, but the mechanism behind efficient N uptake in intercropping is not well understood. Therefore, this study aimed to measure the effect of crop diversity on N uptake in intercrop and to assess the mechanisms contributing to diversity effects.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>The N uptake on equivalent area basis was determined during 2012 to 2014 using a long-term experiment established in 2009 including faba bean/maize intercropping and corresponding monocultures. Complementarity effects (CE) and selection effects (SE) were calculated to assess N complementarity/facilitation and dominant species effects.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Faba bean/maize intercropping had 17.6% greater system N uptake than weighted means of two monocultures. The fertilizer-N rate required to achieve the maximum total N uptake was 300 kg N ha<sup>–1</sup> without inoculation and was 225 kg N ha<sup>–1</sup> with inoculation. Similar results were observed for biological N fixation of faba bean. Enhanced N uptake from intercropping compared with monoculture was strongly and positively correlated with the CE, but not correlated with the SE. In addition, N fixation accounted for approximately 20% of the positive CE in faba bean/maize intercropping.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>N complementarity and/or facilitation drove the increased N uptake in faba bean/maize intercropping. The results highlight the role of applying microbial inoculants to increase crop N uptake while reducing reliance on fertilizer N especially in newly reclaimed desert soils, and may also be useful for guiding the design of intercropping systems with complementary traits for efficient N use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-06950-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-06950-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Complementarity for nitrogen use in maize/faba bean intercropping with inoculation
Background and aims
Intercropping with legumes is beneficial for crop nitrogen (N) uptake, but the mechanism behind efficient N uptake in intercropping is not well understood. Therefore, this study aimed to measure the effect of crop diversity on N uptake in intercrop and to assess the mechanisms contributing to diversity effects.
Methods
The N uptake on equivalent area basis was determined during 2012 to 2014 using a long-term experiment established in 2009 including faba bean/maize intercropping and corresponding monocultures. Complementarity effects (CE) and selection effects (SE) were calculated to assess N complementarity/facilitation and dominant species effects.
Results
Faba bean/maize intercropping had 17.6% greater system N uptake than weighted means of two monocultures. The fertilizer-N rate required to achieve the maximum total N uptake was 300 kg N ha–1 without inoculation and was 225 kg N ha–1 with inoculation. Similar results were observed for biological N fixation of faba bean. Enhanced N uptake from intercropping compared with monoculture was strongly and positively correlated with the CE, but not correlated with the SE. In addition, N fixation accounted for approximately 20% of the positive CE in faba bean/maize intercropping.
Conclusions
N complementarity and/or facilitation drove the increased N uptake in faba bean/maize intercropping. The results highlight the role of applying microbial inoculants to increase crop N uptake while reducing reliance on fertilizer N especially in newly reclaimed desert soils, and may also be useful for guiding the design of intercropping systems with complementary traits for efficient N use.
期刊介绍:
Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.