利用条件生成对抗网络(cGANs)计算虚拟三维减影血管造影。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING BMC Medical Imaging Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1186/s12880-024-01454-7
Sebastian Johannes Müller, Eric Einspänner, Stefan Klebingat, Seraphine Zubel, Roland Schwab, Erelle Fuchs, Elie Diamandis, Eya Khadhraoui, Daniel Behme
{"title":"利用条件生成对抗网络(cGANs)计算虚拟三维减影血管造影。","authors":"Sebastian Johannes Müller, Eric Einspänner, Stefan Klebingat, Seraphine Zubel, Roland Schwab, Erelle Fuchs, Elie Diamandis, Eya Khadhraoui, Daniel Behme","doi":"10.1186/s12880-024-01454-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Subtraction angiographies are calculated using a native and a contrast-enhanced 3D angiography images. This minimizes both bone and metal artifacts and results in a pure image of the vessels. However, carrying out the examination twice means double the radiation dose for the patient. With the help of generative AI, it could be possible to simulate subtraction angiographies from contrast-enhanced 3D angiographies and thus reduce the need for another dose of radiation without a cutback in quality. We implemented this concept by using conditional generative adversarial networks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We selected all 3D subtraction angiographies from our PACS system, which had performed between 01/01/2018 and 12/31/2022 and randomly divided them into training, validation, and test sets (66%:17%:17%). We adapted the pix2pix framework to work on 3D data and trained a conditional generative adversarial network with 621 data sets. Additionally, we used 158 data sets for validation and 164 for testing. We evaluated two test sets with (n = 72) and without artifacts (n = 92). Five (blinded) neuroradiologists compared these datasets with the original subtraction dataset. They assessed similarity, subjective image quality, and severity of artifacts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Image quality and subjective diagnostic accuracy of the virtual subtraction angiographies revealed no significant differences compared to the original 3D angiographies. While bone and movement artifact level were reduced, artifact level caused by metal implants differed from case to case between both angiographies without one group being significant superior to the other.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conditional generative adversarial networks can be used to simulate subtraction angiographies in clinical practice, however, new artifacts can also appear as a result of this technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"24 1","pages":"276"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481798/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Calculation of virtual 3D subtraction angiographies using conditional generative adversarial networks (cGANs).\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian Johannes Müller, Eric Einspänner, Stefan Klebingat, Seraphine Zubel, Roland Schwab, Erelle Fuchs, Elie Diamandis, Eya Khadhraoui, Daniel Behme\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12880-024-01454-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Subtraction angiographies are calculated using a native and a contrast-enhanced 3D angiography images. This minimizes both bone and metal artifacts and results in a pure image of the vessels. However, carrying out the examination twice means double the radiation dose for the patient. With the help of generative AI, it could be possible to simulate subtraction angiographies from contrast-enhanced 3D angiographies and thus reduce the need for another dose of radiation without a cutback in quality. We implemented this concept by using conditional generative adversarial networks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We selected all 3D subtraction angiographies from our PACS system, which had performed between 01/01/2018 and 12/31/2022 and randomly divided them into training, validation, and test sets (66%:17%:17%). We adapted the pix2pix framework to work on 3D data and trained a conditional generative adversarial network with 621 data sets. Additionally, we used 158 data sets for validation and 164 for testing. We evaluated two test sets with (n = 72) and without artifacts (n = 92). Five (blinded) neuroradiologists compared these datasets with the original subtraction dataset. They assessed similarity, subjective image quality, and severity of artifacts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Image quality and subjective diagnostic accuracy of the virtual subtraction angiographies revealed no significant differences compared to the original 3D angiographies. While bone and movement artifact level were reduced, artifact level caused by metal implants differed from case to case between both angiographies without one group being significant superior to the other.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conditional generative adversarial networks can be used to simulate subtraction angiographies in clinical practice, however, new artifacts can also appear as a result of this technology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Imaging\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"276\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481798/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01454-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01454-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:减影血管造影使用原始和对比增强三维血管造影图像进行计算。这样可以最大限度地减少骨和金属伪影,获得纯净的血管图像。然而,进行两次检查意味着患者要承受双倍的辐射剂量。在生成式人工智能的帮助下,可以模拟对比增强三维血管造影中的减影血管造影,从而在不降低质量的情况下减少对另一剂量辐射的需求。我们利用条件生成对抗网络实现了这一概念:我们从 PACS 系统中选取了 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间进行的所有三维减影血管造影,并将其随机分为训练集、验证集和测试集(66%:17%:17%)。我们调整了 pix2pix 框架,使其适用于三维数据,并使用 621 个数据集训练了条件生成对抗网络。此外,我们使用 158 个数据集进行验证,使用 164 个数据集进行测试。我们评估了有伪影(n = 72)和无伪影(n = 92)的两个测试集。五位(盲人)神经放射学专家将这些数据集与原始减影数据集进行了比较。他们评估了相似性、主观图像质量和伪影的严重程度:结果:虚拟减影血管造影的图像质量和主观诊断准确性与原始三维血管造影相比没有显著差异。虽然骨和运动伪影水平有所降低,但金属植入物造成的伪影水平在两种血管造影中因病例而异,没有一组明显优于另一组:结论:条件生成对抗网络可用于在临床实践中模拟减影血管造影,但这项技术也会产生新的伪影。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Calculation of virtual 3D subtraction angiographies using conditional generative adversarial networks (cGANs).

Objective: Subtraction angiographies are calculated using a native and a contrast-enhanced 3D angiography images. This minimizes both bone and metal artifacts and results in a pure image of the vessels. However, carrying out the examination twice means double the radiation dose for the patient. With the help of generative AI, it could be possible to simulate subtraction angiographies from contrast-enhanced 3D angiographies and thus reduce the need for another dose of radiation without a cutback in quality. We implemented this concept by using conditional generative adversarial networks.

Methods: We selected all 3D subtraction angiographies from our PACS system, which had performed between 01/01/2018 and 12/31/2022 and randomly divided them into training, validation, and test sets (66%:17%:17%). We adapted the pix2pix framework to work on 3D data and trained a conditional generative adversarial network with 621 data sets. Additionally, we used 158 data sets for validation and 164 for testing. We evaluated two test sets with (n = 72) and without artifacts (n = 92). Five (blinded) neuroradiologists compared these datasets with the original subtraction dataset. They assessed similarity, subjective image quality, and severity of artifacts.

Results: Image quality and subjective diagnostic accuracy of the virtual subtraction angiographies revealed no significant differences compared to the original 3D angiographies. While bone and movement artifact level were reduced, artifact level caused by metal implants differed from case to case between both angiographies without one group being significant superior to the other.

Conclusion: Conditional generative adversarial networks can be used to simulate subtraction angiographies in clinical practice, however, new artifacts can also appear as a result of this technology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
期刊最新文献
In vitro detection of cancer cells using a novel fluorescent choline derivative. Prediction of esophageal fistula in radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy for patients with advanced esophageal cancer by a clinical-deep learning radiomics model : Prediction of esophageal fistula in radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy patients. Prior information guided deep-learning model for tumor bed segmentation in breast cancer radiotherapy. The predictive value of nomogram for adnexal cystic-solid masses based on O-RADS US, clinical and laboratory indicators. The study on ultrasound image classification using a dual-branch model based on Resnet50 guided by U-net segmentation results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1