实现对动物研究中 3R 原则的共同解释

IF 5.9 3区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES Lab Animal Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1038/s41684-024-01476-2
Jan Lauwereyns, Jeffrey Bajramovic, Bettina Bert, Samuel Camenzind, Joery De Kock, Alisa Elezović, Sevilay Erden, Fernando Gonzalez-Uarquin, Yesim Isil Ulman, Orsolya Ivett Hoffmann, Maria Kitsara, Nikolaos Kostomitsopoulos, Winfried Neuhaus, Benoit Petit-Demouliere, Simone Pollo, Brígida Riso, Sophie Schober, Athanassia Sotiropoulos, Aurélie Thomas, Augusto Vitale, Doris Wilflingseder, Arti Ahluwalia
{"title":"实现对动物研究中 3R 原则的共同解释","authors":"Jan Lauwereyns, Jeffrey Bajramovic, Bettina Bert, Samuel Camenzind, Joery De Kock, Alisa Elezović, Sevilay Erden, Fernando Gonzalez-Uarquin, Yesim Isil Ulman, Orsolya Ivett Hoffmann, Maria Kitsara, Nikolaos Kostomitsopoulos, Winfried Neuhaus, Benoit Petit-Demouliere, Simone Pollo, Brígida Riso, Sophie Schober, Athanassia Sotiropoulos, Aurélie Thomas, Augusto Vitale, Doris Wilflingseder, Arti Ahluwalia","doi":"10.1038/s41684-024-01476-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many scientific breakthroughs have depended on animal research, yet the ethical concerns surrounding the use of animals in experimentation have long prompted discussions about humane treatment and responsible scientific practice. First articulated by Russell and Burch, the 3Rs Principles of Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement have gained widespread recognition as basic guidelines for animal research. Over time, the 3Rs have transcended the research community, influencing policy decisions, animal welfare advocacy and public perception of animal experimentation. Despite their broad acceptance, interpretations of the 3Rs vary substantially, shaping statutory frameworks at various levels, with both technical and practical impacts.","PeriodicalId":17936,"journal":{"name":"Lab Animal","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a common interpretation of the 3Rs principles in animal research\",\"authors\":\"Jan Lauwereyns, Jeffrey Bajramovic, Bettina Bert, Samuel Camenzind, Joery De Kock, Alisa Elezović, Sevilay Erden, Fernando Gonzalez-Uarquin, Yesim Isil Ulman, Orsolya Ivett Hoffmann, Maria Kitsara, Nikolaos Kostomitsopoulos, Winfried Neuhaus, Benoit Petit-Demouliere, Simone Pollo, Brígida Riso, Sophie Schober, Athanassia Sotiropoulos, Aurélie Thomas, Augusto Vitale, Doris Wilflingseder, Arti Ahluwalia\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41684-024-01476-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many scientific breakthroughs have depended on animal research, yet the ethical concerns surrounding the use of animals in experimentation have long prompted discussions about humane treatment and responsible scientific practice. First articulated by Russell and Burch, the 3Rs Principles of Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement have gained widespread recognition as basic guidelines for animal research. Over time, the 3Rs have transcended the research community, influencing policy decisions, animal welfare advocacy and public perception of animal experimentation. Despite their broad acceptance, interpretations of the 3Rs vary substantially, shaping statutory frameworks at various levels, with both technical and practical impacts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lab Animal\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lab Animal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41684-024-01476-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lab Animal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41684-024-01476-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多科学突破都有赖于动物研究,然而围绕实验中使用动物的伦理问题长期以来一直引发着关于人道待遇和负责任的科学实践的讨论。由罗素和伯奇首次提出的 "3R "原则,即 "替代(Replacement)、减少(Reduction)和改进(Refinement)",作为动物研究的基本准则得到了广泛认可。随着时间的推移,3R 原则已经超越了研究界,影响到政策决策、动物福利倡导和公众对动物实验的看法。尽管 3Rs 已被广泛接受,但对其的解释却大相径庭,影响着不同层面的法定框架,既有技术层面的,也有实践层面的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Toward a common interpretation of the 3Rs principles in animal research
Many scientific breakthroughs have depended on animal research, yet the ethical concerns surrounding the use of animals in experimentation have long prompted discussions about humane treatment and responsible scientific practice. First articulated by Russell and Burch, the 3Rs Principles of Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement have gained widespread recognition as basic guidelines for animal research. Over time, the 3Rs have transcended the research community, influencing policy decisions, animal welfare advocacy and public perception of animal experimentation. Despite their broad acceptance, interpretations of the 3Rs vary substantially, shaping statutory frameworks at various levels, with both technical and practical impacts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lab Animal
Lab Animal 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
181
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: LabAnimal is a Nature Research journal dedicated to in vivo science and technology that improves our basic understanding and use of model organisms of human health and disease. In addition to basic research, methods and technologies, LabAnimal also covers important news, business and regulatory matters that impact the development and application of model organisms for preclinical research. LabAnimal's focus is on innovative in vivo methods, research and technology covering a wide range of model organisms. Our broad scope ensures that the work we publish reaches the widest possible audience. LabAnimal provides a rigorous and fair peer review of manuscripts, high standards for copyediting and production, and efficient publication.
期刊最新文献
In vivo optical tissue clearing using light-absorbing dyes Toward a common interpretation of the 3Rs principles in animal research Murine model of minimally invasive nasal depot (MIND) technique for central nervous system delivery of blood–brain barrier-impermeant therapeutics A facility for laboratory mice with a natural microbiome at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin Development and evaluation of an autism pig model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1