《亚伯拉罕协议》与中东四国战略对话:巴基斯坦能源安全的衰落与未来之路

IF 1.4 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politics & Policy Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1111/polp.12634
Mehmood Hussain, Syed Inam Ali Naqvi, Shahid Hameed
{"title":"《亚伯拉罕协议》与中东四国战略对话:巴基斯坦能源安全的衰落与未来之路","authors":"Mehmood Hussain,&nbsp;Syed Inam Ali Naqvi,&nbsp;Shahid Hameed","doi":"10.1111/polp.12634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>This article traces the impacts of the Abraham Accord and Middle Eastern QUAD on Pakistan's energy security. It asks how and to what extent the Abraham Accord and Middle Eastern QUAD can potentially jeopardize Pakistan's energy security and evaluates the way forward for Pakistan to counter security threats. The study contends the Abraham Accord and Middle Eastern QUAD have extended the influence of India and Israel from the Middle East to the Indian Ocean, thereby increasing the risk to Pakistan's energy supplies. Meanwhile, expanded and intensified securitization of the Strait of Hormuz has likewise increased the vulnerability of energy supplies from the Middle East. Pakistan imports 72% of its energy from the Middle East via the Strait of Hormuz, and any disruption in energy supplies or blockade of maritime routes would severely undermine Pakistan's socioeconomic and political stability. Pakistan, we argue, must therefore diversify its energy imports from Russia, Central Asia, and Iran to safeguard its energy interests.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Related Articles</h3>\n \n <p>Hussain, Mehmood, Ahmed Bux Jamali, Rana Danish Nisar, and Abdulfattah Omar. 2024. “The China–Iran Strategic Deal and CPEC: Navigating the Influence of Pragmatic Balancing in China's Relations with Iran and Pakistan.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 52(1): 227–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12573.</p>\n \n <p>Lazin, Fred A. 2023. “President Donald Trump's Abraham Accords initiative: Prospects for Israel, the Arab states, and Palestinians.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 51(3): 476–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12533.</p>\n \n <p>Thornton, William H., and Songok Han Thornton. 2024. “Extended Commentary—U.S.-Asian Policy in the Throes of McCarthyism, Old and New.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 52(4): 854–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12604.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51679,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Policy","volume":"52 6","pages":"1266-1283"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Abraham Accord and the Middle Eastern QUAD: Pakistan's energy security eclipse and the way forward\",\"authors\":\"Mehmood Hussain,&nbsp;Syed Inam Ali Naqvi,&nbsp;Shahid Hameed\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/polp.12634\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>This article traces the impacts of the Abraham Accord and Middle Eastern QUAD on Pakistan's energy security. It asks how and to what extent the Abraham Accord and Middle Eastern QUAD can potentially jeopardize Pakistan's energy security and evaluates the way forward for Pakistan to counter security threats. The study contends the Abraham Accord and Middle Eastern QUAD have extended the influence of India and Israel from the Middle East to the Indian Ocean, thereby increasing the risk to Pakistan's energy supplies. Meanwhile, expanded and intensified securitization of the Strait of Hormuz has likewise increased the vulnerability of energy supplies from the Middle East. Pakistan imports 72% of its energy from the Middle East via the Strait of Hormuz, and any disruption in energy supplies or blockade of maritime routes would severely undermine Pakistan's socioeconomic and political stability. Pakistan, we argue, must therefore diversify its energy imports from Russia, Central Asia, and Iran to safeguard its energy interests.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Related Articles</h3>\\n \\n <p>Hussain, Mehmood, Ahmed Bux Jamali, Rana Danish Nisar, and Abdulfattah Omar. 2024. “The China–Iran Strategic Deal and CPEC: Navigating the Influence of Pragmatic Balancing in China's Relations with Iran and Pakistan.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 52(1): 227–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12573.</p>\\n \\n <p>Lazin, Fred A. 2023. “President Donald Trump's Abraham Accords initiative: Prospects for Israel, the Arab states, and Palestinians.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 51(3): 476–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12533.</p>\\n \\n <p>Thornton, William H., and Songok Han Thornton. 2024. “Extended Commentary—U.S.-Asian Policy in the Throes of McCarthyism, Old and New.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 52(4): 854–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12604.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politics & Policy\",\"volume\":\"52 6\",\"pages\":\"1266-1283\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politics & Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.12634\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.12634","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文追溯了《亚伯拉罕协议》和中东四国战略伙伴关系对巴基斯坦能源安全的影响。报告询问了《亚伯拉罕协议》和中东四国战略伙伴关系如何以及在多大程度上可能危及巴基斯坦的能源安全,并评估了巴基斯坦应对安全威胁的前进道路。该研究认为,《亚伯拉罕协议》和中东四方战略伙伴关系将印度和以色列的影响力从中东扩展到印度洋,从而增加了巴基斯坦能源供应的风险。与此同时,霍尔木兹海峡的扩大和加强证券化同样增加了中东能源供应的脆弱性。巴基斯坦通过霍尔木兹海峡从中东进口72%的能源,任何能源供应的中断或海上航线的封锁都会严重破坏巴基斯坦的社会经济和政治稳定。因此,我们认为,巴基斯坦必须使其从俄罗斯、中亚和伊朗的能源进口多样化,以维护其能源利益。侯赛因、马哈茂德、艾哈迈德·布克斯·贾马利、拉纳·丹麦·尼萨尔和阿卜杜勒法塔赫·奥马尔。2024。“中伊战略协议和中巴经济走廊:在中国与伊朗和巴基斯坦关系中寻求务实平衡的影响。”政治,政策52(1):227-44。https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12573。弗雷德·拉辛,2009。“唐纳德·特朗普总统的亚伯拉罕协议倡议:以色列、阿拉伯国家和巴勒斯坦的前景。”政治,政策51(3):476-87。https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12533。威廉·H·桑顿和松谷汉·桑顿,2024。“Commentary-U.S扩展。——《新与旧麦卡锡主义阵痛中的亚洲政策》政治,政策52(4):854-73。https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12604。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Abraham Accord and the Middle Eastern QUAD: Pakistan's energy security eclipse and the way forward

This article traces the impacts of the Abraham Accord and Middle Eastern QUAD on Pakistan's energy security. It asks how and to what extent the Abraham Accord and Middle Eastern QUAD can potentially jeopardize Pakistan's energy security and evaluates the way forward for Pakistan to counter security threats. The study contends the Abraham Accord and Middle Eastern QUAD have extended the influence of India and Israel from the Middle East to the Indian Ocean, thereby increasing the risk to Pakistan's energy supplies. Meanwhile, expanded and intensified securitization of the Strait of Hormuz has likewise increased the vulnerability of energy supplies from the Middle East. Pakistan imports 72% of its energy from the Middle East via the Strait of Hormuz, and any disruption in energy supplies or blockade of maritime routes would severely undermine Pakistan's socioeconomic and political stability. Pakistan, we argue, must therefore diversify its energy imports from Russia, Central Asia, and Iran to safeguard its energy interests.

Related Articles

Hussain, Mehmood, Ahmed Bux Jamali, Rana Danish Nisar, and Abdulfattah Omar. 2024. “The China–Iran Strategic Deal and CPEC: Navigating the Influence of Pragmatic Balancing in China's Relations with Iran and Pakistan.” Politics & Policy 52(1): 227–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12573.

Lazin, Fred A. 2023. “President Donald Trump's Abraham Accords initiative: Prospects for Israel, the Arab states, and Palestinians.” Politics & Policy 51(3): 476–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12533.

Thornton, William H., and Songok Han Thornton. 2024. “Extended Commentary—U.S.-Asian Policy in the Throes of McCarthyism, Old and New.” Politics & Policy 52(4): 854–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12604.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Politics & Policy
Politics & Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
23.10%
发文量
61
期刊最新文献
Issue Information “Where you stand depends on where you sit”: The politics of petroleum pricing in Ghana's election cycle Note from the Editor and Acknowledgment of Reviewers 2023–2024 A paradox of public engagement: The discursive politics of environmental justice in Canada's Chemical Valley Democratic interventionists versus pragmatic realists: Employing the advocacy coalition framework to explain Obama's shift in multilateralism with European allies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1