两组美国青少年的性取向、性教育课程和接触肯定/否定LGB内容之间的关联。

IF 1.4 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Sex Education-Sexuality Society and Learning Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-13 DOI:10.1080/14681811.2022.2072286
Ariella R Tabaac, Michelle M Johns, Dougie Zubizarreta, Sebastien Haneuse, Andy S L Tan, S Bryn Austin, Jennifer Potter, Laura Lindberg, Brittany M Charlton
{"title":"两组美国青少年的性取向、性教育课程和接触肯定/否定LGB内容之间的关联。","authors":"Ariella R Tabaac, Michelle M Johns, Dougie Zubizarreta, Sebastien Haneuse, Andy S L Tan, S Bryn Austin, Jennifer Potter, Laura Lindberg, Brittany M Charlton","doi":"10.1080/14681811.2022.2072286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sexual health education experienced by lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) youth varies widely in relevancy and representation. However, associations among sexual orientation, type of sex education, and exposure to affirming or disaffirming content have yet to be examined. Understanding these patterns can help to address gaps in LGB-sensitive sex education. Our goal in this study was to examine the prevalence and associations among abstinence-only until marriage (AOUM) and comprehensive sex education with LGB-affirming and -disaffirming content sought/received before age 18 (from 1999-2014) by sexual orientation (completely heterosexual with same-sex contact, completely heterosexual with no same-sex contact, mostly heterosexual, bisexual, gay/lesbian) in a sample of 12,876 US young adults from the Growing Up Today Study. Compared to completely heterosexual referents, LGB participants who received AOUM sex education were more likely to encounter LGB-disaffirming content, and this effect was largest among sexual minority participants. Conversely, exposure to comprehensive sex education was associated with receipt of LGB-affirming information. Overall, participants commonly reported receiving AOUM sex education, which may lead to deficits and potential harm to sexual minorities.</p>","PeriodicalId":47510,"journal":{"name":"Sex Education-Sexuality Society and Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10530727/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations between sexual orientation, sex education curriculum, and exposure to affirming/disaffirming LGB content in two US-based cohorts of adolescents.\",\"authors\":\"Ariella R Tabaac, Michelle M Johns, Dougie Zubizarreta, Sebastien Haneuse, Andy S L Tan, S Bryn Austin, Jennifer Potter, Laura Lindberg, Brittany M Charlton\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14681811.2022.2072286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sexual health education experienced by lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) youth varies widely in relevancy and representation. However, associations among sexual orientation, type of sex education, and exposure to affirming or disaffirming content have yet to be examined. Understanding these patterns can help to address gaps in LGB-sensitive sex education. Our goal in this study was to examine the prevalence and associations among abstinence-only until marriage (AOUM) and comprehensive sex education with LGB-affirming and -disaffirming content sought/received before age 18 (from 1999-2014) by sexual orientation (completely heterosexual with same-sex contact, completely heterosexual with no same-sex contact, mostly heterosexual, bisexual, gay/lesbian) in a sample of 12,876 US young adults from the Growing Up Today Study. Compared to completely heterosexual referents, LGB participants who received AOUM sex education were more likely to encounter LGB-disaffirming content, and this effect was largest among sexual minority participants. Conversely, exposure to comprehensive sex education was associated with receipt of LGB-affirming information. Overall, participants commonly reported receiving AOUM sex education, which may lead to deficits and potential harm to sexual minorities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sex Education-Sexuality Society and Learning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10530727/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sex Education-Sexuality Society and Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2022.2072286\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/6/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sex Education-Sexuality Society and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2022.2072286","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋青年经历的性健康教育在相关性和代表性方面差异很大。然而,性取向、性教育类型和接触肯定或否定内容之间的联系尚待研究。了解这些模式有助于解决对LGB敏感的性教育方面的差距。我们在这项研究中的目标是通过性取向来检验婚前禁欲(AOUM)和全面性教育与18岁之前(从1999年到2014年)寻求/接受的LGB肯定和否定内容之间的流行率和相关性(完全异性恋有同性接触,完全异性恋没有同性接触,主要是异性恋、双性恋、男同性恋)来自“今日成长研究”的12876名美国年轻人样本。与完全异性恋的参考对象相比,接受AOUM性教育的LGB参与者更有可能遇到LGB否认内容,这种影响在性少数群体参与者中最大。相反,接受全面性教育与接受确认LGB的信息有关。总体而言,参与者通常报告接受了AOUM性教育,这可能会导致缺陷,并对性少数群体造成潜在伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Associations between sexual orientation, sex education curriculum, and exposure to affirming/disaffirming LGB content in two US-based cohorts of adolescents.

Sexual health education experienced by lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) youth varies widely in relevancy and representation. However, associations among sexual orientation, type of sex education, and exposure to affirming or disaffirming content have yet to be examined. Understanding these patterns can help to address gaps in LGB-sensitive sex education. Our goal in this study was to examine the prevalence and associations among abstinence-only until marriage (AOUM) and comprehensive sex education with LGB-affirming and -disaffirming content sought/received before age 18 (from 1999-2014) by sexual orientation (completely heterosexual with same-sex contact, completely heterosexual with no same-sex contact, mostly heterosexual, bisexual, gay/lesbian) in a sample of 12,876 US young adults from the Growing Up Today Study. Compared to completely heterosexual referents, LGB participants who received AOUM sex education were more likely to encounter LGB-disaffirming content, and this effect was largest among sexual minority participants. Conversely, exposure to comprehensive sex education was associated with receipt of LGB-affirming information. Overall, participants commonly reported receiving AOUM sex education, which may lead to deficits and potential harm to sexual minorities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
10.50%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Staff perceptions of support for early menarche in Australian primary schools: a qualitative study Threats to accessing information about sexuality: examining the most frequently challenged books in the USA from 2011-2021 Shattering the silence: exploring the role of Chinese online sexual health influencers in promoting sex education Live-streaming comprehensive sexuality education in Western China: an analysis of the views of implementers and junior secondary students School health teachers’ gender-sensitive sexual health education experiences in South Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1