美国参与儿童福利制度的青年在接受正规和非正规性教育方面的国家趋势和不同机会。

IF 1.4 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Sex Education-Sexuality Society and Learning Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-24 DOI:10.1080/14681811.2022.2134102
Julia Brasileiro, Laura Widman, Kate Norwalk, Jordyn McCrimmon, Lily Mullins
{"title":"美国参与儿童福利制度的青年在接受正规和非正规性教育方面的国家趋势和不同机会。","authors":"Julia Brasileiro, Laura Widman, Kate Norwalk, Jordyn McCrimmon, Lily Mullins","doi":"10.1080/14681811.2022.2134102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to understand whether youth involved with the child welfare system in the USA are receiving formal and informal sex education. Data come from the Second National Survey of Child and Adolescent Wellbeing, a nationally representative sample of children and adolescents in contact with child protective services. Participants included young people (<i>n</i>=1093, aged 11-21) involved with the child welfare system. Participants reported whether they had received formal sex education about a) abstinence only; b) contraceptives/condoms only; c) abstinence and contraceptives/condoms; or d) none. They also reported whether they knew where to access family planning services. We examined the prevalence of sex education experiences and differences in sex education access and knowledge based on participants' pregnancy history and sociodemographic characteristics. Only half (49%) of participants had received any form of formal sex education. Pregnant youth were less likely to have received any sex education compared to non-pregnant youth (<i>p</i>=.045). 72% of adolescents who had received sex education about contraceptives/condoms reported knowing where to access family planning services compared to only 46% of adolescents who had not received sex education about contraceptives/condoms (<i>p</i>=.014). There is a pressing need for comprehensive sex education among young people involved with the child welfare system in the USA.</p>","PeriodicalId":47510,"journal":{"name":"Sex Education-Sexuality Society and Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10578646/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"National trends and disparate access to formal and informal sex education among youth involved with the child welfare system in the USA.\",\"authors\":\"Julia Brasileiro, Laura Widman, Kate Norwalk, Jordyn McCrimmon, Lily Mullins\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14681811.2022.2134102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to understand whether youth involved with the child welfare system in the USA are receiving formal and informal sex education. Data come from the Second National Survey of Child and Adolescent Wellbeing, a nationally representative sample of children and adolescents in contact with child protective services. Participants included young people (<i>n</i>=1093, aged 11-21) involved with the child welfare system. Participants reported whether they had received formal sex education about a) abstinence only; b) contraceptives/condoms only; c) abstinence and contraceptives/condoms; or d) none. They also reported whether they knew where to access family planning services. We examined the prevalence of sex education experiences and differences in sex education access and knowledge based on participants' pregnancy history and sociodemographic characteristics. Only half (49%) of participants had received any form of formal sex education. Pregnant youth were less likely to have received any sex education compared to non-pregnant youth (<i>p</i>=.045). 72% of adolescents who had received sex education about contraceptives/condoms reported knowing where to access family planning services compared to only 46% of adolescents who had not received sex education about contraceptives/condoms (<i>p</i>=.014). There is a pressing need for comprehensive sex education among young people involved with the child welfare system in the USA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sex Education-Sexuality Society and Learning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10578646/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sex Education-Sexuality Society and Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2022.2134102\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sex Education-Sexuality Society and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2022.2134102","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在了解参与美国儿童福利制度的青少年是否正在接受正式和非正式的性教育。数据来自第二次全国儿童和青少年健康调查,这是一个具有全国代表性的接触儿童保护服务的儿童和青少年样本。参与者包括参与儿童福利制度的年轻人(n=1093,年龄在11-21岁之间)。参与者报告他们是否接受过关于a)仅禁欲的正式性教育;b) 仅限避孕药具/避孕套;c) 禁欲和避孕药具/避孕套;或d)无。他们还报告说,他们是否知道在哪里可以获得计划生育服务。我们根据参与者的怀孕史和社会人口特征,研究了性教育经历的普遍性以及性教育机会和知识的差异。只有一半(49%)的参与者接受过任何形式的正规性教育。与未怀孕的青少年相比,怀孕的青少年接受任何性教育的可能性较小(p=0.045)。接受过避孕药具/避孕套性教育的青少年中,72%的人表示知道在哪里可以获得计划生育服务,而未接受避孕药具或避孕套性教育的年轻人中,这一比例仅为46%(p=0.014)美国参与儿童福利制度的年轻人的性教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
National trends and disparate access to formal and informal sex education among youth involved with the child welfare system in the USA.

This study aimed to understand whether youth involved with the child welfare system in the USA are receiving formal and informal sex education. Data come from the Second National Survey of Child and Adolescent Wellbeing, a nationally representative sample of children and adolescents in contact with child protective services. Participants included young people (n=1093, aged 11-21) involved with the child welfare system. Participants reported whether they had received formal sex education about a) abstinence only; b) contraceptives/condoms only; c) abstinence and contraceptives/condoms; or d) none. They also reported whether they knew where to access family planning services. We examined the prevalence of sex education experiences and differences in sex education access and knowledge based on participants' pregnancy history and sociodemographic characteristics. Only half (49%) of participants had received any form of formal sex education. Pregnant youth were less likely to have received any sex education compared to non-pregnant youth (p=.045). 72% of adolescents who had received sex education about contraceptives/condoms reported knowing where to access family planning services compared to only 46% of adolescents who had not received sex education about contraceptives/condoms (p=.014). There is a pressing need for comprehensive sex education among young people involved with the child welfare system in the USA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
10.50%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Staff perceptions of support for early menarche in Australian primary schools: a qualitative study Threats to accessing information about sexuality: examining the most frequently challenged books in the USA from 2011-2021 Shattering the silence: exploring the role of Chinese online sexual health influencers in promoting sex education Live-streaming comprehensive sexuality education in Western China: an analysis of the views of implementers and junior secondary students School health teachers’ gender-sensitive sexual health education experiences in South Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1