拍摄看不见的墨西哥:玛雅·戈德的社会参与纪录片。

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Hispanic Research Journal-Iberian and Latin American Studies Pub Date : 2021-09-03 DOI:10.1080/14682737.2022.2061807
Russell White
{"title":"拍摄看不见的墨西哥:玛雅·戈德的社会参与纪录片。","authors":"Russell White","doi":"10.1080/14682737.2022.2061807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"his limited spare time. The four main contributors have gathered the latest research and dispelled long-held assumptions and misreadings about the life of the artist. Jesusa Vega debunks the desire to see Goya and the Duchess of Alba as lovers, pointing out that the relationship was familial rather than romantic; McDonald gives us a new approach to the artist’s sketching techniques; while Chaparro and Cer on-Pe~ na, who have already published work addressing obscurities of the artist’s early life, show their expertise here in entries on individual pieces and remain questioning and open-minded, bringing out unresolved ambiguities in the narratives of each image. The late aquatint, Seated Giant, one of the most innovative designs Goya ever produced (item 48, 164) is related through technique and inspiration to Goya’s painting El Coloso (fig. 45, 164) which Professor Vega accepts as an authentic work, without any qualifiers (59). The painting, which is now attributed to Goya on the Prado label, having been previously thought to be the work of a pupil, is connected to the analysis of the print and here the writers only refer in a cursory way to the disagreement which has marred its authenticity. A slightly more tentative assessment appears in the catalogue entry which notes: “Goya’s authorship of that painting has been called into question [... ]. This view has been vigorously challenged and there is growing support for the painting to be returned to Goya” (164). Despite the vociferous clamor of the for-and-against arguments, as Goya writes tellingly on a drawing of a single figure standing in a desolate landscape and waving his arms: “No har as nada con clamar” (item 78, 232). Scrolling through Amazon lists of the many Goya biographies on sale, it is not unusual to find readers lamenting the sparse attention art historians of the past have paid to prints and drawings in their analyses of Goya’s career. Goya’s “recognition derives mainly from his accomplishments as a painter” (13), but the balance of his posthumous fame is tipping in favour of the new ascendancy of his long commitment to graphic design. There have in recent years been several important exhibitions of Goya’s works on paper, but this show and its accompanying catalogue give us a much clearer insight into the complexities of Goya’s life-long passion for graphic media.","PeriodicalId":42561,"journal":{"name":"Hispanic Research Journal-Iberian and Latin American Studies","volume":"22 1","pages":"559 - 560"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Photographing the Unseen Mexico: Maya Goded’s Socially Engaged Documentaries.\",\"authors\":\"Russell White\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14682737.2022.2061807\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"his limited spare time. The four main contributors have gathered the latest research and dispelled long-held assumptions and misreadings about the life of the artist. Jesusa Vega debunks the desire to see Goya and the Duchess of Alba as lovers, pointing out that the relationship was familial rather than romantic; McDonald gives us a new approach to the artist’s sketching techniques; while Chaparro and Cer on-Pe~ na, who have already published work addressing obscurities of the artist’s early life, show their expertise here in entries on individual pieces and remain questioning and open-minded, bringing out unresolved ambiguities in the narratives of each image. The late aquatint, Seated Giant, one of the most innovative designs Goya ever produced (item 48, 164) is related through technique and inspiration to Goya’s painting El Coloso (fig. 45, 164) which Professor Vega accepts as an authentic work, without any qualifiers (59). The painting, which is now attributed to Goya on the Prado label, having been previously thought to be the work of a pupil, is connected to the analysis of the print and here the writers only refer in a cursory way to the disagreement which has marred its authenticity. A slightly more tentative assessment appears in the catalogue entry which notes: “Goya’s authorship of that painting has been called into question [... ]. This view has been vigorously challenged and there is growing support for the painting to be returned to Goya” (164). Despite the vociferous clamor of the for-and-against arguments, as Goya writes tellingly on a drawing of a single figure standing in a desolate landscape and waving his arms: “No har as nada con clamar” (item 78, 232). Scrolling through Amazon lists of the many Goya biographies on sale, it is not unusual to find readers lamenting the sparse attention art historians of the past have paid to prints and drawings in their analyses of Goya’s career. Goya’s “recognition derives mainly from his accomplishments as a painter” (13), but the balance of his posthumous fame is tipping in favour of the new ascendancy of his long commitment to graphic design. There have in recent years been several important exhibitions of Goya’s works on paper, but this show and its accompanying catalogue give us a much clearer insight into the complexities of Goya’s life-long passion for graphic media.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hispanic Research Journal-Iberian and Latin American Studies\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"559 - 560\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hispanic Research Journal-Iberian and Latin American Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14682737.2022.2061807\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hispanic Research Journal-Iberian and Latin American Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14682737.2022.2061807","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

他有限的业余时间。四位主要撰稿人收集了最新的研究成果,消除了长期以来对这位艺术家生活的假设和误读。耶稣·维加(Jesusa Vega)揭穿了人们把戈雅和阿尔巴公爵夫人看作恋人的想法,指出他们的关系是家族性的,而不是浪漫的;麦克唐纳为我们提供了一种新的方法来了解艺术家的素描技巧;而Chaparro和Cer on- pe ~ na已经发表了关于艺术家早期生活模糊的作品,他们在个人作品中展示了他们的专业知识,并保持了质疑和开放的态度,在每个图像的叙述中带来了未解决的模糊性。已故的aquatint,《坐着的巨人》是戈雅创作过的最具创新性的设计之一(第48,164项),从技术和灵感上讲,它与戈雅的《El Coloso》(图45,164项)有关,Vega教授认为这幅画是真品,没有任何修饰(59项)。这幅画,现在在普拉多的标签上被认为是戈雅的作品,之前被认为是一个学生的作品,与版画的分析有关,这里的作者只是粗略地提到了损害其真实性的分歧。在目录条目中出现了一个稍显试探性的评估,其中写道:“戈雅对这幅画的作者身份受到质疑……]. 这一观点受到了强烈的挑战,越来越多的人支持将这幅画归还戈雅”(164)。尽管赞成和反对的争论吵吵闹闹,戈雅在一幅画上生动地写道:“No har as nada con clamar”,画中有一个人站在荒凉的风景中,挥舞着他的手臂。翻阅亚马逊(Amazon)上出售的许多戈雅传记,不难发现读者在哀叹,过去的艺术史学家在分析戈雅的职业生涯时,很少关注版画和素描。戈雅的“知名度主要来自他作为画家的成就”(13),但他死后的名声正逐渐向他长期致力于平面设计的新优势倾斜。近年来,戈雅的几次重要的纸上作品展览,但这次展览及其附带的目录让我们更清楚地了解戈雅一生对平面媒体的热情的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Photographing the Unseen Mexico: Maya Goded’s Socially Engaged Documentaries.
his limited spare time. The four main contributors have gathered the latest research and dispelled long-held assumptions and misreadings about the life of the artist. Jesusa Vega debunks the desire to see Goya and the Duchess of Alba as lovers, pointing out that the relationship was familial rather than romantic; McDonald gives us a new approach to the artist’s sketching techniques; while Chaparro and Cer on-Pe~ na, who have already published work addressing obscurities of the artist’s early life, show their expertise here in entries on individual pieces and remain questioning and open-minded, bringing out unresolved ambiguities in the narratives of each image. The late aquatint, Seated Giant, one of the most innovative designs Goya ever produced (item 48, 164) is related through technique and inspiration to Goya’s painting El Coloso (fig. 45, 164) which Professor Vega accepts as an authentic work, without any qualifiers (59). The painting, which is now attributed to Goya on the Prado label, having been previously thought to be the work of a pupil, is connected to the analysis of the print and here the writers only refer in a cursory way to the disagreement which has marred its authenticity. A slightly more tentative assessment appears in the catalogue entry which notes: “Goya’s authorship of that painting has been called into question [... ]. This view has been vigorously challenged and there is growing support for the painting to be returned to Goya” (164). Despite the vociferous clamor of the for-and-against arguments, as Goya writes tellingly on a drawing of a single figure standing in a desolate landscape and waving his arms: “No har as nada con clamar” (item 78, 232). Scrolling through Amazon lists of the many Goya biographies on sale, it is not unusual to find readers lamenting the sparse attention art historians of the past have paid to prints and drawings in their analyses of Goya’s career. Goya’s “recognition derives mainly from his accomplishments as a painter” (13), but the balance of his posthumous fame is tipping in favour of the new ascendancy of his long commitment to graphic design. There have in recent years been several important exhibitions of Goya’s works on paper, but this show and its accompanying catalogue give us a much clearer insight into the complexities of Goya’s life-long passion for graphic media.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“Entre nalgas protegido”: Escatología y contracultura del Humanismo al Barroco Baroque Lorca: An Archaist Playwright for the New Stage “Miss Spain in Exile”: Isa Reyes’ Escape from the Spanish Civil War El codi torbat: De la poesia experimental a l’escriptura conceptual “Todas somos la manada”: Terrorismo sexual, hipervisibilización mediática y la obra de teatro Jauría
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1